win a ball from Bowling.com
« previous next »
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: Sharp Noize VS Twisted Fury Destruction  (Read 1256 times)

snowspike1

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 391
Sharp Noize VS Twisted Fury Destruction
« on: February 17, 2010, 04:46:27 AM »
I posted this in the Brunswick section also

 
Any thoughts on this.  By the looks of BTM reviews its a toss up.  I kow they have 2 diff surfaces so i guess what whould it be like if they were to have the same surface (both 2000 or both rough buff ect).
Logged

 

TheFreeAgent

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 795
Re: Sharp Noize VS Twisted Fury Destruction
« Reply #1 on: February 17, 2010, 09:23:57 PM »
quote:
Don't you EVER get tired of posting questions like these?


This is a BOWLING BALL review site, have you forgotten that? so a comparison question is allowed.
--------------------
REFS: MrEddie(BBE), notsohotshot(BR), akanayte(UTA)
Logged
Ryan "Junk" Pitman
Ebonite amateur staff
Indianapolis IN.

bluerrpilot

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1235
Re: Sharp Noize VS Twisted Fury Destruction
« Reply #2 on: February 17, 2010, 11:37:23 PM »
The SN cover will handle a little more oil, it will flare a bit more and is quicker off the spot
--------------------
"USBC is concerned that technology has overtaken player skill in determining success in the sport of bowling"

http://www.phxbowling.com/acba
http://www.viseinserts.com/
Logged
Pages: [1]
« previous next »