win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: SuperFlex Coverstock Solution for Dry Lanes?  (Read 7421 times)

bgh

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 702
SuperFlex Coverstock Solution for Dry Lanes?
« on: March 11, 2006, 06:01:26 AM »
I currently have the Scout Reactive that is drilled 5.5 X 5.5 love it for super dry lanes (I planned it that way).  But being the way that it is drilled and my high roll track (see profile), it does not move enough on a medium light condition to carry the pins.  Looking for a ball with the Superflex coverstock (can be Columbia, AMF, or Track) that would handle a fairly dry THS. Looking for a tame reaction ball! but one that has a bit more umph.  Would fit in between the SR (5.5X5.5) and a Blue Urethane Hammer (label with pin in 1").
Now, of course I could buy another Scout Reactive drill more conventionally which is an option.  But I can't help but toy with the idea of maybe a solid or particle with the SF cover drilled to go long (that is as in arcing, not angular), also can have a stronger weight block than the weaker puck configuration that the SR has, that would carry a wee bit better than the Scout Reactive. The condition in question does not include much oil.  So it would have to fit into that slot. I found the Superflex coverstock prep easy to work with, so that's the trip, but not opposed to similar covers by any of the manufacturers.

BTW, nothing wrong with the Scout Reactive damn great ball when used on a dryish condition.  Love it and the way it is drilled.  Just looking for the next step that I could rotate back into if carry becomes a problem.

--------------------
K-----------R
--*--------*--
----*---*-----
----EX-------
----*---*-----
--*-------*---
L-----------G      
The Bowling Ball Manufacturing Kingdom Scorecard (hint: they are all good)
Brunswick ***** (King)(Budweiser/Anheuser-Busch)[make Elite, Lane#1, MoRich]
Storm ***** (Prince)(Coors)[make Roto Grip, Dyno-Thane, Circle Athletics?(in transition  purchased by Columbia Industries)]
Columbia **** (nobleman)(Miller)[make Track, AMF]
Ebonite *** (jester)(Strohs)[make Hammer]
Visionary (no current rating)(wizard)(microbrew?)
Lanemaster (no current rating)(knight)(more microbrew?)
[Note: The end companies usually spec out their own balls]

KeglerX's Ball Arsenal Registry (includes drilling Specs) @ Allbowling.com




Edited on 3/11/2006 2:34 PM

 

charlest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24526
Re: SuperFlex Coverstock Solution for Dry Lanes?
« Reply #16 on: March 12, 2006, 07:19:28 PM »
KeglerX,

As far as I can see the differences between the Saturn and the Mercury are quite standard. Realize that some solid/pearl combos come with the solid polished; this one comes with the Saturn sanded to 800 dull/matte. So there's a larger and, in my opinion, more proper difference between them. I think they have the potential to make a great medium-light to medium+ oil combination or partners. (When the Saturn is kept "fresh" at 800 grit, it can handle a little mor ethan medium oil, for some bowlers, depending on rev rate/ball speed proportions.)

By "more proper", I'm implying that when the Saturn, when used stock is either too strong or too early, then the Mercury, when used with an idential or at least very similar drilling, can be used as a "goto" ball. And vice versa. In my opinion, when a solid is polished, the partner pearlized version is not a good "goto" ball. It will be too strong.

--------------------
"...for advice is a dangerous gift, even from the wise to the wise...."
J. R. R. Tolkien

"None are so blind as those who will not see."