win a ball from Bowling.com
« previous next »
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: which is actually stronger...total bedlam or world beater  (Read 1673 times)

letitroll

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 11
which is actually stronger...total bedlam or world beater
« on: May 01, 2011, 11:59:39 PM »
 Ok...from what I've seen the total bedlam looks to be stronger. The overall hook and recovery seems sick with this ball. The world beater looks fairly strong but I'm not sold on it...what do some of you guys/ladies think? My house is synthetic with a 42 ft pattern. My ball speed is 18-19...my rev rate is 400 plus...give me some opinoions~suggestions. I've thrown the pure physics and didn't like the roll or the movement of the ball...let me know...thanks


Jeff

Logged

 

letitroll

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 11
Re: which is actually stronger...total bedlam or world beater
« Reply #1 on: May 04, 2011, 04:40:13 PM »
 100 views and noone has any comments on these 21 balls? Come on guys, someone has to have thrown these or seen them thrown...give me a suggestion

Logged

NeumannKnight

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 449
Re: which is actually stronger...total bedlam or world beater
« Reply #2 on: May 04, 2011, 05:09:10 PM »
I have not seen these two balls side to side. Overall, the World Beater would be strong because the larger core would dictate early roll and be heavier rolling.
 
The total bedlam has a slimmer core which would dictate more length, but the strong cover will allow it to cover more boards quickly. 


I'm in the process of trying to find out where I fit in the bowling world. I do not know my tech specs of my game, but it's all a learning process.
Logged
Pages: [1]
« previous next »