win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: Control-It vs. Delayed Reaction  (Read 2762 times)

da Shiv

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1118
Control-It vs. Delayed Reaction
« on: September 04, 2003, 08:14:32 AM »
Both of these products advertise pretty much the same results.  I've used Control-It and have found it to work as advertised.  Track's Delayed Reaction is new and I haven't used it yet.

Has anyone used both of these products?  Any comments on the difference?  

Shiv
--------------------
Listening to the monotonous staccato of rain on my desk top
Listening to the monotonous staccato of rain on my desk top

 

RandyO

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1213
Re: Control-It vs. Delayed Reaction
« Reply #1 on: September 05, 2003, 12:03:13 AM »
Haven't used either, but have a question. If you wanted to polish up a urethane ball (black hammer), would control it be the one to use? Doesn't make much sense to use a 'reactive' polish on a urethane ball. Or I guess there's always the Lustre King!

RandyO

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1213
Re: Control-It vs. Delayed Reaction
« Reply #2 on: September 05, 2003, 12:47:43 AM »
If the 'control-it' type of stuff is putting silicon into the pores, then I might as well save money and just use my can of "Rain Dance". It sure puts the 'long skid' on my White Dot.

10 In The Pit

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 642
Re: Control-It vs. Delayed Reaction
« Reply #3 on: September 06, 2003, 05:54:30 AM »
Actually I don't believe that Control-It puts silicone into the pores of the ball.    Rather, it has an agent that creates a molecular bond with the coverstock of the ball that promotes skid.  The Control-It has to be sanded or scuffed to be removed.  And, if you bowl on a very aggressive lane surface, the Control-It in the track area can be eroded away in several games.  I think that Neo Tac recommends a recoating every 9 games or so, or more often if the effects seem to wear off quicker.