BallReviews
General Category => Coverstock Preparation => Topic started by: Bowlin for Beer on November 03, 2009, 05:51:12 AM
-
Does anyone know what grit polishes these would be comparable to ?
1200 and 2000 ? Other ?
the pro shop I go to doesn't use Brunswick polishes.
Thanks.
-
both of these products from brunswick contain no grit or grit rating. rough buff is basically rubbing and finishing compound. it will add a matte finish to the ball and increase length slightly. it will have more length than a dull ball but better bite in the oil than a polished ball. the factory finish high gloss polish should add 3-4' in length and more backend reaction when it hits the dry part of the lane.
-
AFAIK, Rough Buff is a VERY coarse rubbing compound, and it is recommended to use with a 220 grit sanded base - righteously. It will mellow out the deep sanding lines, levelling the "hills and valleys" on the surface, also keeping the surface itself open. The result looks much like a 2.000-4.000 Abralon wet sanded ball, but the texture is different, and you will IMHO see a more even reaction. RB is also tricky to handle, because it is so abrasive. Beware!
The High Gloss polish is IMO a fine rubbing compound. It definitiely contains some grit, it also levels out sanding lines, but on a much finer level. Compared to RB it really adds length, but extender polishes have more to offer. Personally, I like it as an everyday polish on anything glossy - I use a 1.500 grit basis, and that combo has worked for me on a lot of balls from different manufacturers.
--------------------
DizzyFugu - Reporting from Germany
Confused by bowling? Check out BR.com's vault of wisdom: the unofficial FAQ section (http://"http://www.ballreviews.com/Forum/Replies.asp?TopicID=74110&ForumID=16&CategoryID=5")