BallReviews

General Category => Coverstock Preparation => Topic started by: Weaser on December 06, 2013, 03:19:01 PM

Title: Brunswick Rough Buff vs. Royal Compound
Post by: Weaser on December 06, 2013, 03:19:01 PM

According to label, Royal Compound will create a 2500 grit surface. How does Rough Buff compare if both balls were sanded to 500 grit prior to application as per Brunswick normal procedure? THX in advance.

Title: Re: Brunswick Rough Buff vs. Royal Compound
Post by: heavyarty on February 18, 2014, 06:48:11 PM

the rough buff is more of a matte finish. i would think its in the range of 800-1200 grit. shiny/dull depends on application.

Title: Re: Brunswick Rough Buff vs. Royal Compound
Post by: kidlost2000 on February 18, 2014, 07:35:42 PM

Just from personal experience so far the royal compound definitely gives a more polished finish. Its strongstuff.

Title: Re: Brunswick Rough Buff vs. Royal Compound
Post by: charlest on February 18, 2014, 11:47:43 PM

Quote from: kidlost2000 on February 18, 2014, 07:35:42 PM

Just from personal experience so far the royal compound definitely gives a more polished finish. It's strong stuff.

Whereas I found little to no difference between them, but that was on just one ball.