win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: Coverstock Alterations - Less Backend?  (Read 8564 times)

se7en

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 904
Coverstock Alterations - Less Backend?
« on: August 21, 2006, 03:31:03 PM »
My current arsenal is an Elite P43 for light/medium oil, which for me is a great ball to pull out for fresh league conditions.

I just got a Lane #1 Cobalt Bomb and a Track Machine to add to it. All three balls I have drilled exactly the same, though they vary with CG to pin distance.

Anyhow, the Cobalt and Machine respond great for my style with carry down or heavy oil, which is great, it fills in that gap. However, my Machine has the exact same shape and hook on the back ends regardless of conditions. I don't need two balls that do the same thing obviously.

I was hoping the Machine would replace the Elite P43 as my benchmark ball for medium oil or fresh league conditions, but I have a feeling I drilled it to do exactly what it's doing (pin next to ring finger, CG under palm). I avoided getting the Mean Machine because I wanted a more tame ball.. makes me wonder how hard the MM hooks, hehe.

Is there anything I can do coverstock wise to bring the Machine down a notch, or anything that doesn't require plugging and redrilling? Both the Cobalt and Machine roll beautifully, but they are both just a little too much ball for my style without carrydown or lots of oil.
--------------------
Elite P43 - 16#
Lane #1 Cobalt Bomb - 15#
Track Machine 15#

 

Joe Jr

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2776
Re: Coverstock Alterations - Less Backend?
« Reply #1 on: August 21, 2006, 11:40:17 PM »
Taking it to higher grit and polishing it will make it weaker but will increase the backend reaction.

You can have your proshop add a flare reducing weight hole, which should weaken the ball with adding much more backend reaction
--------------------
- Joe
Formerly Richard Cranium

www.Brunswickbowling.com
www.Brunswickinsiders.com

Edited on 7/21/2005 1:21 PM

DON DRAPER

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5576
Re: Coverstock Alterations - Less Backend?
« Reply #2 on: August 21, 2006, 11:52:14 PM »
you can decrease the amount of backend reaction on a bowling ball by sanding the ball against the track---instead of the sanding lines running parallel with your track have the ball sanded so the sanding lines go across it. this will cause the ball to hook earlier but tone down the backend.

Joe Jr

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2776
Re: Coverstock Alterations - Less Backend?
« Reply #3 on: August 21, 2006, 11:54:24 PM »
I think he also wants the ball weaker too. Atleast that's what I got out of it.
--------------------
- Joe
Formerly Richard Cranium

www.Brunswickbowling.com
www.Brunswickinsiders.com

Edited on 7/21/2005 1:21 PM

DON DRAPER

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5576
Re: Coverstock Alterations - Less Backend?
« Reply #4 on: August 22, 2006, 12:02:30 AM »
if he wants the ball weaker and he's asking can it be done by coverstock alterations then having it hook earlier and laying off on the backend is weakening the amount of backend. if he wetsands the ball very fine( up to a 4,000 grit abralon pad ) and finishes the ball off with some rubbing and finishing compound( not polish---too skid/flip )this will weaken the backend reaction. perhaps he needs a weaker ball instead ?

charlest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24526
Re: Coverstock Alterations - Less Backend?
« Reply #5 on: August 22, 2006, 02:50:29 AM »
Track's Delayed Reaction will make the ball go a little longer and hook less in the backend. It has what they call a "slip agent".

However, I also agree with Greg Hoppe idea of taking it to 4000 grit and leave it there. It will get almost the same length as a polish but reduce the backend due to lesss aggressive surface. I would NOT use the rubbing compound until you try the ball with the 4000 grit finish. The compound will still add to the length and reduce the backend even further. That may be too much.

The Machine is supposed to come with a "Compound Finish" which is basically a 1000 grit polish.

Another potential finish procedure is to sand the cover to 1000 grit then add a dose of Delayed Reaction. This will add a level of polish for length and the Slip Agent for reduced backend.

If the above ball still has too much backend or overall hook,
the next procedure to try is to sand to 2000 grit; then add the Delayed Reaction.
--------------------
"None are so blind as those who will not see."
"None are so blind as those who will not see."

Macabre

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 463
Re: Coverstock Alterations - Less Backend?
« Reply #6 on: August 22, 2006, 03:03:49 AM »
quote:
Track's Delayed Reaction will make the ball go a little longer and hook less in the backend. It has what they call a "slip agent".

However, I also agree with Greg Hoppe idea of taking it to 4000 grit and leave it there. It will get almost the same length as a polish but reduce the backend due to lesss aggressive surface. I would NOT use the rubbing compound until you try the ball with the 4000 grit finish. The compound will still add to the length and reduce the backend even further. That may be too much.

The Machine is supposed to come with a "Compound Finish" which is basically a 1000 grit polish.

Another potential finish procedure is to sand the cover to 1000 grit then add a dose of Delayed Reaction. This will add a level of polish for length and the Slip Agent for reduced backend.

If the above ball still has too much backend or overall hook,
the next procedure to try is to sand to 2000 grit; then add the Delayed Reaction.
--------------------
"None are so blind as those who will not see."


That stuff makes a ball skate, that's for sure.

It made my old X-Factor skate like no other, and make a nice calm move.
--------------------
Abandon naive realism, surrender thought in cold precision.

dizzyfugu

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7606
Re: Coverstock Alterations - Less Backend?
« Reply #7 on: August 22, 2006, 03:39:03 AM »
Spread your pinkie finger away and put your index finger close too the middle finger. That should tame down any ball's back end without tinkering too much with the surface or x-holes.

Even though polish will principally make the ball go longer, it might even make ball reaction "worse" since the ball might break more violently and erratic once it hits dry ground. It is a strategy to test, but you might have to make some trial shots to see if it really yields the desired reaction.
--------------------

DizzyFugu - Reporting from Germany
Team "X" website & more about me: http://web.mac.com/timlinked/iWeb/X/Thomas.html
"The Future's So Bright I Gotta Wear Shades" - PatMacDonald
DizzyFugu ~ Reporting from Germany

Noy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 831
Re: Coverstock Alterations - Less Backend?
« Reply #8 on: August 22, 2006, 03:49:54 AM »
How about sanding it down and letting the ball burn up on its way down?
--------------------
Bowling Since March 2006 - "Get coaching, don't worry about it"...blah blah balh...Just answer the questions please

Arsenal:
Storm Agent
Soon:
Action
Radical Inferno
Track Equation
Black Widow (May replace the Action or RI)


Turkey Adobo (Me and my friends' bowling site)
http://turkeyadobo.multiply.com

se7en

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 904
Re: Coverstock Alterations - Less Backend?
« Reply #9 on: August 22, 2006, 06:49:28 AM »
Thanks guys.
--------------------
Elite P43 - 16#
Lane #1 Cobalt Bomb - 15#
Track Machine 15#