win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: New ball coverstock recommendation  (Read 2257 times)

jbrown

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 36
New ball coverstock recommendation
« on: December 12, 2004, 04:24:26 AM »
Hello,

I'm getting rid of a heavy oil particle ball and have been trying to decide what to replace with.  I like the control of particle over the snappiness of reactive, but notice that new reactives seem to be replacing particles.  

So...can anyone explain the difference between particles and new reactives?  Will they hook as much in oil as a particle?  And are they as controllable as a particle ball (or close)?

Any advice appreciated.  Thanks.

 

LuckyLefty

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17348
Re: New ball coverstock recommendation
« Reply #1 on: December 15, 2004, 05:36:26 PM »
Proprietors seemed to have really gotten smart!  to particles.

In other words they have done a lot of the following reduced teh volume of oil in the heads and mids and lenghtened these low volume shots.  These often make particles somewhat ineffective.  They bite early on the low volume and then if they don't go high at the breakpoint they don't create as much backend as pure reactives to create enough hook in the few feet of dry left!

However in the new realm of non particle particles ie Infernos, Bullies and Soakers????  It appears that these balls handle this new crappy condition better.
Whether they really handle high volume oil better is a question I don't know since I don't have one.

But from observation at tournies it seems they get thru the heads better and have a little more backend than pure solid particles.  They actually look like they hook better and more evenly than reactives and also get thru the heads better and don't create a trough in the pattern quite as quick!

REgards,

luckylefty
It takes Courage to have Faith, and Faith to have Courage.

James M. McCurley, New Orleans, Louisiana