win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: High Polish or Driled Negative Weight  (Read 2028 times)

Dakota

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 101
High Polish or Driled Negative Weight
« on: February 17, 2006, 07:08:12 AM »
Hi -

Would it be better to highly polish a ball, i.e., 2000 grit, for dry conditions or have it drilled negative weight?

Thanks -

Denny

 

JohnP

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5819
Re: High Polish or Driled Negative Weight
« Reply #1 on: February 18, 2006, 10:32:13 AM »
Of the choices you've given us, polishing is best.  But best of all is proper selection of the ball.  For really dry conditions, I'll recommend one more time the Visionary slate blue Gargoyle  --  pearl urethane with a dynamic core.  Then polish it up if necessary.  --  JohnP

Strider

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6759
Re: High Polish or Driled Negative Weight
« Reply #2 on: February 18, 2006, 01:55:11 PM »
By negative weight do you mean putting the CG on the track side of your grip center?  Static weights have little to do with ball reaction when dealing with dynamic cores.  Order of importance, after bowler's style and lane conditions, are surface (type and grit), pin position (flare), MB position (assumed on a symmetric ball), then weight holes and static weights.

So, since I have a Slate Blue Gargoyle, highly polished, with the pin 5" from my PAP and above the fingers, and the CG negative, do I have all bases covered?  
--------------------
Penn State Proud

Ron Clifton's Bowling Tip Archive

JohnP

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5819
Re: High Polish or Driled Negative Weight
« Reply #3 on: February 18, 2006, 08:41:00 PM »
Strider -- Do you like your Slate Blue as much as I like mine?  --  JohnP

Strider

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6759
Re: High Polish or Driled Negative Weight
« Reply #4 on: February 19, 2006, 06:05:58 PM »
I'm hot and cold with it.  Something about slick finger holes (this ball, Blue Dot) keep me from releasing it well all of the time.  I tend to grab the ball at the release too often for my liking.  With resin, you'll still get an OK reaction, but with pearl urethane, I just get a dead pull with nothing on it.  The ball itself I like a lot under the right circumstances.  When the lanes are torched, I still prefer resin for my game because the urethane still wants to grab early.  This piece isn't one I want to get inside with and cover a bunch of boards.  Going away from the pocket much really kills carry percentage for me.  But when I can use this ball more down the boards and the backends are dry (making resin too snappy and hard to control), this ball is a great option.  If I could find something tacky to coat the inside of the finger holes with (no inserts, don't want to use rosin constantly and dry my fingers out) I'd probably get a lot more use out of it.  I currently see a lot of dry inconsistent lanes, and this is a great ball that keeps you in play and out of trouble.
--------------------
Penn State Proud

Ron Clifton's Bowling Tip Archive

JohnP

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5819
Re: High Polish or Driled Negative Weight
« Reply #5 on: February 20, 2006, 10:46:07 AM »
Strider -- For some of the reasons you mention, I have my SBG polished to 2000 grit.  I also don't use it much inside the second arrow.  Because of my low speed with medium revs, I use this ball on conditions that most people would consider medium.  And I'm dead on really dry lanes.  I envy Tommy Jones' ability to move deep inside and throw hard.

Two thoughts on the finger hole problem - either take some ~100 grit sandpaper and rough up the front inside of the holes or slightly increase the size of the holes and use either white grip tape or an appropriately sized piece of a cork insert to give the feel you want.