win a ball from Bowling.com
« previous next »
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: (asymmetric) Pin up vs Pin down???  (Read 11791 times)

ignitebowling

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 997
(asymmetric) Pin up vs Pin down???
« on: May 14, 2018, 06:12:20 PM »
Round two of pin up vs pin down.

Moving forward we have the Ebonite Real One (int diff .029)to try with our same bowler from the symmetric demo to see what the results look like. Looking at the affects on core numbers, tracking the ball on the lane, and the bowling balls track flare.

Less detailed then the previous article. More so to let the pictures provided tell the story. See what you think.

https://drive.google.com/open?id=1-DR2e3lee0Dx92o64FW4wkZb9aswt9bE
Logged
Ignite your game, and set the lanes on fire. www.facebook.com/ignitebowling  or @ignite_bowling

 

HackJandy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1321
  • On to greener pastures
Re: (asymmetric) Pin up vs Pin down???
« Reply #1 on: May 14, 2018, 06:37:09 PM »
GJ thanks for the data.  :)
Logged
Kind of noob when made this account so take advice with grain of salt.

imagonman

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 98
Re: (asymmetric) Pin up vs Pin down???
« Reply #2 on: May 15, 2018, 11:20:41 AM »
So what does this say about dual angle layouts? VAL angles? Drill ratios etc.?
Logged

Impending Doom

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6288
Re: (asymmetric) Pin up vs Pin down???
« Reply #3 on: May 15, 2018, 12:24:26 PM »
Mo is going to come knocking on your door mad as Hades!!!

Love the article, man. Keep it up.
Logged

ignitebowling

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 997
Re: (asymmetric) Pin up vs Pin down???
« Reply #4 on: May 15, 2018, 02:22:50 PM »
Mo used the help of blueprint when the did the track flare studies on asymmetric and symmetric article a few years ago.  The information isn't new to him,  or to manufacturers.
Logged
Ignite your game, and set the lanes on fire. www.facebook.com/ignitebowling  or @ignite_bowling

tkkshop

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1173
Re: (asymmetric) Pin up vs Pin down???
« Reply #5 on: May 15, 2018, 02:30:23 PM »
is this with a plugged weight hole or nah?

 :D :D :D

good stuff
Logged

DP3

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6093
Re: (asymmetric) Pin up vs Pin down???
« Reply #6 on: May 15, 2018, 02:51:08 PM »
Just save your money on drilling and throw it no holes, out of a towel like Norm Duke. It's gonna face up and destroy the hole anyways.
Logged

Impending Doom

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6288
Re: (asymmetric) Pin up vs Pin down???
« Reply #7 on: May 15, 2018, 02:57:20 PM »
Quote from: DP3 on May 15, 2018, 02:51:08 PM
Just save your money on drilling and throw it no holes, out of a towel like Norm Duke. It's gonna face up and destroy the hole anyways.

#noholesmatter
Logged

imagonman

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 98
Re: (asymmetric) Pin up vs Pin down???
« Reply #8 on: May 15, 2018, 03:13:44 PM »
Quote from: ignitebowling on May 15, 2018, 02:22:50 PM
Mo used the help of blueprint when the did the track flare studies on asymmetric and symmetric article a few years ago.  The information isn't new to him,  or to manufacturers.

Then why do we continue to drink the 'dual angle is great' Kool-Aid when these 2 blueprint sims you've done show NO difference in ball positions @ 60ft. , the roll phase distance, or angle entry between VAL angles of 20* vs 70*???
As you know, according to the 'information' out there, there should be a BIG difference between those to balls as to
A) length of hook zone
B) 2nd transition - i.e. roll phase
Why do we not see that in either of the 2 sims you've recently shown us?????
Logged

leftybowler70

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1710
Re: (asymmetric) Pin up vs Pin down???
« Reply #9 on: May 15, 2018, 04:24:39 PM »
Quote from: DP3 on May 15, 2018, 02:51:08 PM
Just save your money on drilling and throw it no holes, out of a towel like Norm Duke. It's gonna face up and destroy the hole anyways.

Almost laughed out of my pants.  😂
Logged

ignitebowling

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 997
Re: (asymmetric) Pin up vs Pin down???
« Reply #10 on: May 15, 2018, 04:33:05 PM »
Quote from: imagonman on May 15, 2018, 03:13:44 PM
Quote from: ignitebowling on May 15, 2018, 02:22:50 PM
Mo used the help of blueprint when the did the track flare studies on asymmetric and symmetric article a few years ago.  The information isn't new to him,  or to manufacturers.

Then why do we continue to drink the 'dual angle is great' Kool-Aid when these 2 blueprint sims you've done show NO difference in ball positions @ 60ft. , the roll phase distance, or angle entry between VAL angles of 20* vs 70*???
As you know, according to the 'information' out there, there should be a BIG difference between those to balls as to
A) length of hook zone
B) 2nd transition - i.e. roll phase
Why do we not see that in either of the 2 sims you've recently shown us?????


Heavy friction house conditions blend out the ball reaction of many bowling balls and layouts. Next we will see how things changed going into some heavier oiled conditions.
Logged
Ignite your game, and set the lanes on fire. www.facebook.com/ignitebowling  or @ignite_bowling

HackJandy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1321
  • On to greener pastures
Re: (asymmetric) Pin up vs Pin down???
« Reply #11 on: May 15, 2018, 05:15:46 PM »
Quote from: imagonman on May 15, 2018, 03:13:44 PM
Quote from: ignitebowling on May 15, 2018, 02:22:50 PM
Mo used the help of blueprint when the did the track flare studies on asymmetric and symmetric article a few years ago.  The information isn't new to him,  or to manufacturers.

Then why do we continue to drink the 'dual angle is great' Kool-Aid when these 2 blueprint sims you've done show NO difference in ball positions @ 60ft. , the roll phase distance, or angle entry between VAL angles of 20* vs 70*???
As you know, according to the 'information' out there, there should be a BIG difference between those to balls as to
A) length of hook zone
B) 2nd transition - i.e. roll phase
Why do we not see that in either of the 2 sims you've recently shown us?????

I think it might be somewhat bowler specific as to how much it matters but honestly based on everything I have seen and read over at BTM most people think it matters far more than it does.  Personally I think its more a fine tune carry type thing more than anything.  Don't even a lot of PBA guys for the most part only stick with a few layouts?  Seems like a lot of the people I have seen that insist a 1/4" in a layout matters are THS warriors spraying balls all over the place anyway.
« Last Edit: May 15, 2018, 05:21:33 PM by HackJandy »
Logged
Kind of noob when made this account so take advice with grain of salt.

six pack

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2799
Re: (asymmetric) Pin up vs Pin down???
« Reply #12 on: May 15, 2018, 09:29:17 PM »
I used to fall into this layout trap back in the day but have learned my lesson. Now I put my 1 favorite layout one all my symmetric balls and let the manufacture's intent dictate ball reaction. I even try my own interpretation on the factory cover finish. I've been pleased with the results and have focus on what really maters, my game. I really don't see a need for asymmetric balls anymore for my game either. It's all marketing IMO.
Logged
The harder I try the harder they fall

Strapper_Squared

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4231
Re: (asymmetric) Pin up vs Pin down???
« Reply #13 on: May 16, 2018, 04:26:59 AM »
This core looks similar to others recently that have been designed to minimize removal of core material during drilling.  These help to keep starting core Dynamics (or minimize changes).  Wouldn't anticipate much of a change from these.  Radical scoop core comes to mind.

That being said - interesting results - always like to see data supporting conclusions.
Logged
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Pages: [1]
« previous next »