win a ball from Bowling.com
« previous next »
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: Pin to Val distance  (Read 3023 times)

BKloss

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 266
Pin to Val distance
« on: August 10, 2009, 03:23:07 AM »
What correlation does the distance from the Pin to Val have?

Example 4" pin to PAP 1" from val
vs
4" pin to PAP 3" from val

What difference in reaction would you expect to see?
--------------------

 
Logged

 

Juggernaut

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6498
  • Former good bowler, now 3 games a week house hack.
Re: Pin to Val distance
« Reply #1 on: August 10, 2009, 11:37:43 AM »
http://www.stormbowling.com/drill-specs/psa_drill-right-reading.pdf

  That link has some info. Storm refers to the VAL as the PAL and gives a little info about what the pin buffer does.
--------------------
Good transactions list in my profile

"The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits."
Albert Einstein



Logged
Learn to laugh, and love, and smile, cause we’re only here for a little while.

bluerrpilot

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1235
Re: Pin to Val distance
« Reply #2 on: August 10, 2009, 03:09:05 PM »
In combination with surface prep it affects the way the ball responds to friction. Example #1 would be very angular compared to example #2 that would be smoother or slower.

Using a dual angle layout, the second angle is similar to the pin buffer. Smaller angle = shorter distance = quicker response. Larger angle = longer distance = smoother or slower response.


--------------------
"USBC is concerned that technology has overtaken player skill in determining success in the sport of bowling"

Edited on 8/10/2009 3:12 PM
Logged

JohnP

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5819
Re: Pin to Val distance
« Reply #3 on: August 10, 2009, 04:41:00 PM »
Logged

Warmon

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 54
Re: Pin to Val distance
« Reply #4 on: August 10, 2009, 06:01:59 PM »
quote:
What correlation does the distance from the Pin to Val have?


The inverse of Pin to ML. It's the same thing described a different way. The dual angle method is also the same thing described a different way. In the years past many standard layouts used pin buffer to ML to describe various reactions. The pin buffer layout is easy to do, easy to understand and easy to visualize. I think it's the best / easiest method to layout a ball.
Logged

Xcessive_Evil

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1853
Re: Pin to Val distance
« Reply #5 on: August 10, 2009, 09:09:41 PM »
quote:
In combination with surface prep it affects the way the ball responds to friction. Example #1 would be very angular compared to example #2 that would be smoother or slower.

Using a dual angle layout, the second angle is similar to the pin buffer. Smaller angle = shorter distance = quicker response. Larger angle = longer distance = smoother or slower response.


--------------------
"USBC is concerned that technology has overtaken player skill in determining success in the sport of bowling"

Edited on 8/10/2009 3:12 PM


Can't be said any better.
--------------------
You may be the better bowler, but my car would blow the doors off of yours.
http://smg.photobucket.com/albums/v690/Phoenix_RsX/Arsenal/
Logged

Jay

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1312
Re: Pin to Val distance
« Reply #6 on: August 14, 2009, 04:50:18 AM »
I was wondering something about this distance.  Could it be said that smaller pin buffers make the ball lose energy quicker once it starts to read the lane?
--------------------
Justin
Logged
Pages: [1]
« previous next »