win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: Feedback on core with more mass in the bottom  (Read 4381 times)

lefty50

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1822
Feedback on core with more mass in the bottom
« on: May 04, 2019, 11:05:38 AM »
Looking for feedback on the theory that having more weight in the bottom of the core like the Hammer Statement has a positive impact on continuation... Feedback?
Thanks in advance

 

BowlingForDonuts

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1120
Re: Feedback on core with more mass in the bottom
« Reply #1 on: May 04, 2019, 12:34:01 PM »
Creed core also is bottom heavy.  I think it does help with an asym but probably not that much.  I don't quite see the continuation with my Creed I see with my Scandal Pearl for example.
« Last Edit: May 04, 2019, 12:36:14 PM by BowlingForDonuts »
Here today.  Gone tomorrow.

bowler100

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 184
Re: Feedback on core with more mass in the bottom
« Reply #2 on: May 04, 2019, 08:28:36 PM »
Looking for feedback on the theory that having more weight in the bottom of the core like the Hammer Statement has a positive impact on continuation... Feedback?
Thanks in advance
Honestly, I don't know the science behind this but I have found balls with cores that have more mass at the bottom have a smoother and more continuous reaction. Balls like the Morich Colossus Supreme and the Storm La Nina/El Nino have a very elongated hook phase in my experience while the Track Silencer (being pretty top heavy) has a very defined hook/set reaction.

six pack

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2799
Re: Feedback on core with more mass in the bottom
« Reply #3 on: May 04, 2019, 10:12:30 PM »
I found this to be true to a point. you have to also consider int.diff in the equation. My 0.11 int.diff rebellion despite cover prep goes much longer then my compound buff hit man enforcer with a int.diff of 0.20. I've found top heavy cores to flip while bottom heavy are long and continues.
The harder I try the harder they fall