win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: finger weight or thumb weight?  (Read 11831 times)

TeeP Nade

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 136
finger weight or thumb weight?
« on: February 18, 2015, 10:14:06 AM »
which one is "better" to have? i know you have to be within one oz of finger thumb as well as left/right. but i was wondering the difference between having more finger weight vs having more thumb weight? i know for weight holes, the further down you go with the weight hole the more it increases flare...so does that mean that having more finger weight is better if you want a ball to flare more and hook more?

 

Nails

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1703
Re: finger weight or thumb weight?
« Reply #1 on: February 18, 2015, 10:34:54 AM »
Neither is better. Don't even think about statics unless it's for the purpose of adding a weight hole as part of the original drill pattern. Statics are so far down the list of what influences a ball's reaction that they are basically irrelevant.

kidlost2000

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5789
Re: finger weight or thumb weight?
« Reply #2 on: February 18, 2015, 11:11:40 AM »
I prefer when possible thumb and some positive side weight only for weight hole options.  Otherwise I just care about being within regulation.
…… you can't  add a physics term to a bowling term and expect it to mean something.

TeeP Nade

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 136
Re: finger weight or thumb weight?
« Reply #3 on: February 18, 2015, 11:13:30 AM »
Neither is better. Don't even think about statics unless it's for the purpose of adding a weight hole as part of the original drill pattern. Statics are so far down the list of what influences a ball's reaction that they are basically irrelevant.
i know coverstock/finish is first, i think core is second?

JustRico

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2652
Re: finger weight or thumb weight?
« Reply #4 on: February 18, 2015, 11:24:13 AM »
Cover is first, core strength effects if the ball slows down properly...surface is 75%
Co-author of BowlTec's END GAMES ~ A Bowler's COMPLETE Guide to Bowling; Head Games ~ the MENTAL approach to bowling (and sports) & (r)eVolve
...where knowledge creates striking results...
BowlTEc on facebook...www.iBowlTec.com

xrayjay

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2686
Re: finger weight or thumb weight?
« Reply #5 on: February 18, 2015, 11:54:08 AM »
I was close, I thought 70/30....
Does a round object have sides? I say yes, pizza has triangles..

aka addik since 2003

TeeP Nade

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 136
Re: finger weight or thumb weight?
« Reply #6 on: February 18, 2015, 12:01:05 PM »
Cover is first, core strength effects if the ball slows down properly...surface is 75%
so what about the layout then? or is that part of the core?

JustRico

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2652
Re: finger weight or thumb weight?
« Reply #7 on: February 18, 2015, 12:03:45 PM »
Core dictates flare potential, layout dictates how the ball reacts due to the bowling ball slowing down and the amount of flare created
Co-author of BowlTec's END GAMES ~ A Bowler's COMPLETE Guide to Bowling; Head Games ~ the MENTAL approach to bowling (and sports) & (r)eVolve
...where knowledge creates striking results...
BowlTEc on facebook...www.iBowlTec.com

charlest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24526
Re: finger weight or thumb weight?
« Reply #8 on: February 18, 2015, 12:09:13 PM »
Cover is first, core strength effects if the ball slows down properly...surface is 75%
so what about the layout then? or is that part of the core?

Yes.

As far as I understand static weights in today's environment ---
As has been implied, thumb, top, bottom and side weights are no longer applicable in helping to determine how the drilling will affect the roll and other traits of the vast majority of today's dynamic cored balls.

They are/were significant for what is termed pancake cored balls int he 70s/80s and part of the 90s. Today, maybe 1 in 10,000 sold balls used for strikes have a pancake core; most polyester and many urethane balls still use pancake cores, but again the majority do not use dynamic cores (obviously some do).

Most people only consider static weights to insure a ball is technically legal AND to leave room for a potential weight hole to affect the flare and the dynamics of the drilled ball.
« Last Edit: February 18, 2015, 12:11:09 PM by charlest »
"None are so blind as those who will not see."

BradleyInIrving

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 156
Re: finger weight or thumb weight?
« Reply #9 on: February 18, 2015, 03:09:49 PM »
If you forget about static weights and just layout a ball  your options will be more open as to what you can do with a ball.. .. Static weights are only to make your USBC ball compliant..

So, let's say you have a ball with a 5" pin  (pin being 5" from the cg mark) and have your layout (as an example)  45 x 5" x 60  (45 being drill angle, 5" is pin 5" from your PaP and 60 being the VaL angle) you're going to put a hole roughly in the cg mark area anyway to make it compliant...   ... so your options are WIDE open when it comes to layouts ..