win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: Layout relative to PAP determination  (Read 5216 times)

lefty50

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1822
Layout relative to PAP determination
« on: September 30, 2013, 08:11:27 AM »
I am sure this has been discussed before, but I cannot find it, if someone can provide a reference, that would be great. Otherwise...

I spent all my practice time yesterday using three equally prepared balls (1000 sanded), 2 Motiv Raptor P7, and a Hammer First Blood (although that has little to do with the specific question). This had the side effect of enabling me to see the first oil ring very well. The three balls had very different layouts, and I was amazed to see the difference in location and track of the first oil ring. If I had to measure my PAP off of that oil ring, the results would not even be close.

Now, I have heard that the PAP is different for every ball. I also believe it is possible that the driller is simply not hitting the holes correctly, causing me to release the ball differently. I further acknowledge that a proper test would have been to determine the PAP and place tape at the position to check. Frankly though none of that really matters to the basic question.

If determination of PAP is based from the first oil ring, then my PAP would be dramatically different for every ball. Is this a function of the driller/spans/pitches, or is it a normal fact of your layout? Although I cannot really see the layout having that big a determination in the first oil ring, the differences were at least 1 1/4 inch between the three balls, with one being right next to the thumb, one at .75 inches, and another being almost 1 1/2 inches from the thumb hole.

I know I should know this answer, but I can't think of it...

Thanks
L50

 

JustRico

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2652
Re: Layout relative to PAP determination
« Reply #1 on: September 30, 2013, 08:26:31 AM »
Basing off of purely the oil rings is not specific enough...you need to place a piece of tape of the pap and see where it is off your hand to be specific...oil can dissipate before you can visually check it...even with a possible flaw in the span, you are not going to alter your release that much...the core and amount of surface (dissipating quicker) can effect it more especially taking loft into consideration...layout merely increases or decreases flare.
I would put a piece of tape on each guestimated pap and have someone visually inspect where your actual pap is to be sure
Co-author of BowlTec's END GAMES ~ A Bowler's COMPLETE Guide to Bowling; Head Games ~ the MENTAL approach to bowling (and sports) & (r)eVolve
...where knowledge creates striking results...
BowlTEc on facebook...www.iBowlTec.com

JohnP

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5819
Re: Layout relative to PAP determination
« Reply #2 on: September 30, 2013, 10:22:14 AM »
If you think there are differences in the fit of the balls, the change in first oil ring position could be because of changes in axis tilt.  That will result in different first ring positions but with the same PAP.  --  JohnP

lefty50

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1822
Re: Layout relative to PAP determination
« Reply #3 on: October 01, 2013, 12:49:53 AM »
Thanks to both for the reply. I'll take the observations from weekend practice to the next level on my next practice trip and try to confirm the real PAP, then report back...

kidlost2000

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5789
Re: Layout relative to PAP determination
« Reply #4 on: October 01, 2013, 02:03:21 AM »
Use a plastic ball. Then as stated mark your pap with tape then have it confirmed by someone watching you.
…… you can't  add a physics term to a bowling term and expect it to mean something.

Stan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 667
Re: Layout relative to PAP determination
« Reply #5 on: October 01, 2013, 11:43:54 AM »
Somewhat confused.

Why are we looking for his PAP off his hand at release ?  PAP is located down lane when the ball goes into a roll, therefore if the tape is marked correctly, then the tape will not move once the ball is rolling.  So, why does he need someone to watch him bowl to confirm the tape is not moving ?

What am I missing ?

JustRico

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2652
Re: Layout relative to PAP determination
« Reply #6 on: October 01, 2013, 12:29:13 PM »
Seriously? You don't seriously think that do you? The TRUE PAP is the release PAP which is the axis off your hand...this is what pin to PAP distance is designated from. There is a release axis and then migration.
Co-author of BowlTec's END GAMES ~ A Bowler's COMPLETE Guide to Bowling; Head Games ~ the MENTAL approach to bowling (and sports) & (r)eVolve
...where knowledge creates striking results...
BowlTEc on facebook...www.iBowlTec.com

BallReviews-Removed0385

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 0
Re: Layout relative to PAP determination
« Reply #7 on: October 01, 2013, 12:32:44 PM »
If the PAP is correctly marked with the tape, the rotation (of the tape) will be a "tight spiral" off his hand.  The tighter the better as far as accuracy is concerned.

That is the real value of having someone watch the release and tweak where the tape is put after each shot until you are satisfied.  Hope this makes sense.

Sleeve857

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 31
Re: Layout relative to PAP determination
« Reply #8 on: October 01, 2013, 12:45:33 PM »
Somewhat confused.

Why are we looking for his PAP off his hand at release ?  PAP is located down lane when the ball goes into a roll, therefore if the tape is marked correctly, then the tape will not move once the ball is rolling.  So, why does he need someone to watch him bowl to confirm the tape is not moving ?

What am I missing ?


PAP is found at the release point which is why you need to have someone watching or have a video camera on you. That way you can make sure the tape marked does not flicker/move upon release.

JohnP

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5819
Re: Layout relative to PAP determination
« Reply #9 on: October 01, 2013, 02:44:28 PM »
The various layout systems are set up based on the PAP off the hand.  That's why we use it.  --  JohnP