Higher RG plane (raises RG) and increases the differential.

>the gradient line weight hole system is a crapshoot at best because it doesn't consider core shape . .

Unless you go with one of the recommended Radical drillings (other companies as well?) where they explicitly tell you diff and int diff after drilling (including balance holes) but yeah most of the time crap shoot.

Lol and just hope one of the recommended layouts is going to work out for you, hopefully you have a "normal" PAP . . but I get your point. 

Quote from: HackJandy on December 31, 2017, 09:44:41 PM

>the gradient line weight hole system is a crapshoot at best because it doesn't consider core shape . .

Unless you go with one of the recommended Radical drillings (other companies as well?) where they explicitly tell you diff and int diff after drilling (including balance holes) but yeah most of the time crap shoot.

Yeah and most of their preset layouts aren't for those of us with high axis tilt either (angle totals <70 total nope) which is why was ecstatic found a layout on The Fix I match up with fairly well.

Quote from: Luke Rosdahl on December 31, 2017, 09:40:08 PM

I'm gonna throw a monkey wrench in here too . . the gradient line weight hole system is a crapshoot at best because it doesn't consider core shape . .

Based on the OPs question, I’m assuming sym cores, since long p2p for less flare only applies to syms.

If the core is symmetrical, it doesn’t seem like there’s that much of a crapshoot.

Yes sorry this would focus on symmetrics in my question.

gradient line system is just an educated best guess until someone comes up with something better..  Pap, core shape, spans and more make it impossible for a system to be anything other than a best guess.

and by educated I was in no way referring to science because in the bible it clearly says that onlycgmatters