General Category => Drilling & Layouts => Topic started by: duvallite on January 19, 2011, 03:25:06 PM
Title: MB layout question
Post by: duvallite on January 19, 2011, 03:25:06 PM
"I thought that the further the mb from your track, until you reach the midpoint between your track and your axis, the stronger the downlane reaction?????"
I saw this in a post in the Track section. Is this correct?
Title: Re: MB layout question
Post by: khamûl on January 21, 2011, 03:42:21 AM
Title: Re: MB layout question
Post by: duvallite on January 21, 2011, 03:35:18 PM
Thanks, I appreciate it.
Title: Re: MB layout question
Post by: ccrider on January 21, 2011, 06:02:52 PM
Old technology, maybe. Still does not answer the question. Is it correct. Based on what I have seen and experienced, it is correct.
Those that can do. Those that can't complain. Pimpin ain't easy, but it's mandatory.
Most things we like, we don't need. Most things we need, we don't like. Don't confuse your likes with your needs.
Title: Re: MB layout question
Post by: lefty50 on January 21, 2011, 11:32:57 PM
I too would like to understand the "old technology" answer a bit better. I've always hated asym, and this answer may help. From the way I see it, if I were to measure halfway from my track to my axis (I assume we are talking VAL in this case), the MB would end up in my thumb. Also, I've heard several say that in order for me to cure my inability to make any asym turn, I need to move the MB way out to the VAL. These statements seem to be in conflict with the original answer. Can someone explain?
Thanks in advance
Steve
Signature? I dont need no stinking signature...
Title: Re: MB layout question
Post by: Aloarjr810 on January 22, 2011, 05:38:35 AM
(I think this is what the "old technology" is suppose to be.)
Title: Re: MB layout question
Post by: duvallite on January 24, 2011, 03:08:03 PM
Great information, Aloarjr810. Thanks.
Title: Re: MB layout question
Post by: ccrider on January 24, 2011, 03:32:05 PM
Yea, but is it accurate? At least I think that is the question.
Those that can do. Those that can't complain. Pimpin ain't easy, but it's mandatory.
Most things we like, we don't need. Most things we need, we don't like. Don't confuse your likes with your needs.
Title: Re: MB layout question
Post by: duvallite on January 25, 2011, 11:07:11 AM
Well, it looks like there is still some debate regarding this. I'll have to do some more digging to see what the consensus is.
Title: Re: MB layout question
Post by: Cobalt Bomb on January 25, 2011, 11:20:42 AM
The description given is a little simplistic, and it only in a round about way shows the importance the distance of the MB from the axis. However, it is basically correct in my opinion. As others have stated, MB placement "shapes" the reaction. The midway point between the track and the axis is generally considered the "strongest" placement with closer to the axis giving an earlier roll, further away from the axis later roll.
With all that being said, I have read over and use the dual angle layout and find it easy to understand and reproduce from ball to ball. It allows you to better fine tune the reaction .