win a ball from Bowling.com
« previous next »
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: RICO'D Eraser Blaze.....  (Read 1679 times)

Kyanite

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 129
RICO'D Eraser Blaze.....
« on: March 22, 2008, 03:32:06 PM »
So..., today I caved and had an old NIB Eraser Blaze punched with a RICO layout...  2.5 inch pin, 3.3oz Top-weight.

Tested today on wood lanes (45 foot flat shot) with flying backends, the ball would not jump even when I really got into it...  Nice even strong rolling arc. I am very happy with the reaction I saw, something I previously didn't have in my bag.

I do have a question however...,  The weight-hole placed 6 3/4" from the center of grip through the cg at a 45* angle was just under one inch in diameter.  The side-weight was brought back to legal limits.  I was wondering if by using the smaller x-hole did I change the reaction considerably? If the same ball with the same specs and the recommended 1 1/4" hole was punched and compared to my ball (with the less than one inch diameter hole) would I see a drastic change in ball shape?  With respect to this type of layout how much side-weight should/is be desired?


I am aware that the size of the x-hole will produce minor changes in ball shape (generally speaking - larger=smoother, smaller=sharper)
--------------------
Gottem' Drippin Like Water


Edited on 3/22/2008 11:35 PM
Logged

 

charlest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24526
Re: RICO'D Eraser Blaze.....
« Reply #1 on: March 23, 2008, 08:33:37 AM »
As far as I have learned,
The Rico needs a minimum sized weight hole to affect the shape of the core (roughly 7/8" diameter, 2.5" deep, preferable 1" wide, 3" deep) to insure added flare and asymmetry. SMall holes defeat the goals of the Rico and reduce the overall desireable ball reaction.

A larger, deeper hole will generally be smoother and earlier. Once you have the desired reaction, I don't think changing the hole makes big differences, but it cvan make a difference.
--------------------
"None are so blind as those who will not see."
Unofficial Ballreviews.com FAQ

Edited on 3/23/2008 8:35 AM
Logged
"None are so blind as those who will not see."

Kyanite

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 129
Re: RICO'D Eraser Blaze.....
« Reply #2 on: March 23, 2008, 04:17:53 PM »
charlest,

Isn't there a concern with the side-weight going to negative with a hole that large in diameter and deep....?
--------------------
Gottem' Drippin Like Water
Logged

Mike Austin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2057
Re: RICO'D Eraser Blaze.....
« Reply #3 on: March 23, 2008, 09:37:16 PM »
quote:
charlest,

Isn't there a concern with the side-weight going to negative with a hole that large in diameter and deep....?
--------------------
Gottem' Drippin Like Water


The change in the core dynamics makes a bigger difference than the change in static weights.  I like to use the big bit with my Rico drills almost no matter what.  Don't worry about having negative weight or what the static weights are for that matter.

--------------------
Check out Tony's Journals - they are FREE!!
http://www.allbowling.com/journal/public.php?uid=67&leagueid=2054

Logged
Mike Austin's Bowling Dynamix Pro Shops
Inside Emerald Bowl
Inside Tomball Bowl
Track Pro Staff Member
Vise Grips Staff Member

Kyanite

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 129
Re: RICO'D Eraser Blaze.....
« Reply #4 on: March 23, 2008, 09:50:53 PM »
Interesting....,

Thanks Mike.

I will adjust the hole if need be.  However, Right now it has great mid-lane read and an amazing continuation through the pins.  I really don't wanna mess with what's working.
--------------------
Gottem' Drippin Like Water
Logged

JohnP

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5819
Re: RICO'D Eraser Blaze.....
« Reply #5 on: March 24, 2008, 10:15:51 PM »
Be careful about using too large a balance hole.  USBC rules say 1 1/4" max diameter (no USBC limit on depth), but that includes bevel.  Any hole drilled in a ball should have a little bevel to help prevent cracking, so if you use a 1 1/8" diameter hole you have to be careful not to bevel it too much.  Nationals and perhaps a few other tournaments are probably the only time your balls will be inspected closely enough to catch this, though.  --  JohnP
Logged

novawagonmaster

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4279
Re: RICO'D Eraser Blaze.....
« Reply #6 on: March 25, 2008, 07:36:08 AM »
That's good to know. I have 2 balls with 1-1/4" craters + slight bevel. I will have to remember to not take them to tourneys!

None of my rico'd layouts have a hole larger than 1-1/8".
--------------------
Jon (in Ohio)
aka: Rico Swerve~

Logged
Pages: [1]
« previous next »