win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: Fine tuning with CG  (Read 1478 times)

BrianCRX90

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2486
Fine tuning with CG
« on: December 31, 2010, 08:48:19 AM »
With symetric balls, how much does chaning the position of the CG from stacked to near the track vs near the PAP? I just got a ball and roughly 4 1/2 inches to pap and told the driller to place it near the pap. No reason except most of the equipment is stacked and was trying something different...



 

kidlost2000

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5789
Re: Fine tuning with CG
« Reply #1 on: December 31, 2010, 05:31:12 PM »
The only concern of the cg location is the static weight as a result or it being moved and if a weight hole is needed to make it legal, along with the placement of the weight hole.

 


 

If you watch the vid, at one point is shows how little the core actually moves when the cg is moved from one place to another. The weight of where the cg ends up is the most important thing because of the static weights of the ball. I usually focus on pin placement first, then cg placement. That is to make sure the ball is legal, and or if I'm wanting to add a performance increasing or decreasing weight hole.


Be good, or be good at it.
…… you can't  add a physics term to a bowling term and expect it to mean something.

bluerrpilot

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1235
Re: Fine tuning with CG
« Reply #2 on: January 01, 2011, 07:16:56 AM »
The only reason it makes a difference is that the placement of the xhole will be effecting the ball.


"USBC is concerned that technology has overtaken player skill in determining success in the sport of bowling"

http://www.viseinserts.com/
http://www.astbowling.com/
http://www.phxbowling.com/acba