win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: RICO from the man himself  (Read 7606 times)

getuaload

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 911
RICO from the man himself
« on: February 26, 2008, 04:31:53 AM »
Here is the link to Ric site and the RICO layout for those that dont know.
http://www.brunsnick.com/rico_ball_layout.html
--------------------
Visionary Test staff 07/08

 

getuaload

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 911
Re: RICO from the man himself
« Reply #1 on: February 26, 2008, 03:38:11 PM »
All the same both you guys are great
--------------------
Visionary Test staff 07/08

BrunsNick

  • Brunswick Rep
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 7306
Re: RICO from the man himself
« Reply #2 on: February 26, 2008, 04:11:08 PM »

--------------------
Nick Smith ... A.K.A. Les Badderâ„¢
Brunswick -=- PBA 03-08
http://www.BrunsNick.com
http://www.AskTheBowler.com
http://www.BigBapparel.com
Friends don't let friends drink the Kool-Aid!
Nick Smith
Digital Media Manager - Brunswick Bowling
http://www.brunswickbowling.com
http://www.youtube.com/c/brunsnick

Verbs

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 288
Re: RICO from the man himself
« Reply #3 on: February 26, 2008, 07:59:04 PM »
Nick blushing?!?! I've got to call Ripley's Believe It Or Not on this one.

Verbs
--------------------
Larry Verble

BrunsNick

  • Brunswick Rep
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 7306
Re: RICO from the man himself
« Reply #4 on: February 27, 2008, 01:16:23 AM »
I felt touched... warm and fuzzy.
--------------------
Nick Smith ... A.K.A. Les Badderâ„¢
Brunswick -=- PBA 03-08
http://www.BrunsNick.com
http://www.AskTheBowler.com
http://www.BigBapparel.com
Friends don't let friends drink the Kool-Aid!
Nick Smith
Digital Media Manager - Brunswick Bowling
http://www.brunswickbowling.com
http://www.youtube.com/c/brunsnick

Mike Austin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2057
Re: RICO from the man himself
« Reply #5 on: February 27, 2008, 01:30:51 AM »
Then I hear that song, "When I touch myself....."

Ahhhhaaaahhhhhhh!!!  Run Away, run away!!!
--------------------
www.myspace.com/strikes4days

Check out Tony's Journals - they are FREE!!
http://www.allbowling.com/journal/public.php?uid=67&leagueid=563
Mike Austin's Bowling Dynamix Pro Shops
Inside Emerald Bowl
Inside Tomball Bowl
Track Pro Staff Member
Vise Grips Staff Member

Greg T

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 19916
  • Collateral Damage
Re: RICO from the man himself
« Reply #6 on: February 27, 2008, 07:05:00 AM »

  Why would anyone choose to call this a RICO layout? I can go to nearly any center in the U.S. that is 40 to 50 years old and pick about 30 old Brunswick balls off the rack with this layout. Does no one realize that this, at one time, was a standard layout for all balls? There are a crap load of them at our center, Black Beauties, the old black Ebonites, and all the other rubber stuff that was out back then have this standard layout. I don't know what any of you have in your neck of the woods but I can probably pick up at least 30 of them at any given moment. This is not a new layout by any stretch of the imagination.



--------------------
If yer arm don't hurt ya ain't shiftin it right!
 

RESEARCH!   Don't be a maroon!!.


 
AllBowling.com Off-Ramp!           

pop_1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1140
Re: RICO from the man himself
« Reply #7 on: February 27, 2008, 07:14:20 AM »
its called pin in palm.  NOT RICO!  lol.  just kidding.  

I don't care what its called.  It works for me.  But, I know that Ric has been using a lot and that is why the name kinda stuck.

Edited on 2/27/2008 8:14 AM

Juggernaut

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6498
  • Former good bowler, now 3 games a week house hack.
Re: RICO from the man himself
« Reply #8 on: February 27, 2008, 07:15:35 AM »
quote:

  Why would anyone choose to call this a RICO layout? I can go to nearly any center in the U.S. that is 40 to 50 years old and pick about 30 old Brunswick balls off the rack with this layout. Does no one realize that this, at one time, was a standard layout for all balls? There are a crap load of them at our center, Black Beauties, the old black Ebonites, and all the other rubber stuff that was out back then have this standard layout. I don't know what any of you have in your neck of the woods but I can probably pick up at least 30 of them at any given moment. This is not a new layout by any stretch of the imagination.
 



 GregT,

  Yes, back in the day, most balls were drilled with some variation of an " over the label/pin" drilling.  Thing is, back then, nearly ALL balls were constructed in a three piece pancake weight system.  There was little, if any, dynamics of flare built into the balls.  Basically, they were just round projectiles with nothing dynamic about them, period.

  With the advent of modern era bowling, things changed rapidly.  It quickly became the norm for driller and bowlers to "max out" the performance potential of every ball out there.  Exploring the realms of hook and power as never before.  The old days were left far behind in a cloud of dust.

  The "RICO" drilling isn't QUITE as simple as those old balls drillings, but it does use the laws of physics to help build a more stable ball reaction, much as was in those older balls.  A few specifics had to be found ( whether by trial and error or some other technique) such as x-hole placement and pin-to-pap for most effect.

  As for why they call it "RICO" in the first place?  Not sure, unless it is a play on the name of the guy who said it would work and did it to show people,  maybe Ric Hamlin figured this out?

  Or, maybe, it is from Rico Suave because he is so smooooooooth, lol
--------------------
What did you expect, something PROFOUND?


My Bowl.com member page

Learn to laugh, and love, and smile, cause we’re only here for a little while.

Dan Belcher

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3954
Re: RICO from the man himself
« Reply #9 on: February 27, 2008, 07:17:27 AM »
quote:
Why would anyone choose to call this a RICO layout? I can go to nearly any center in the U.S. that is 40 to 50 years old and pick about 30 old Brunswick balls off the rack with this layout. Does no one realize that this, at one time, was a standard layout for all balls? There are a crap load of them at our center, Black Beauties, the old black Ebonites, and all the other rubber stuff that was out back then have this standard layout. I don't know what any of you have in your neck of the woods but I can probably pick up at least 30 of them at any given moment. This is not a new layout by any stretch of the imagination.
(Haven't I explained this exact thing to you several times now?  It seems like I have...)  Just putting the pin in grip center does not make it a "Rico" layout.  Rico is very specifically pin in grip center, CG swung 45 degrees, x-hole 6 3/4" down in line with the pin and CG.  (Without the x-hole, it ain't Rico!)  Since Ric Hamlin has been one of the biggest fans of this layout for years and has promoted it with his bowlers, it just got the nickname.  And "Rico" is a hell of a lot easier to say than that entire sentence describing the layout above.

Greg T

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 19916
  • Collateral Damage
Re: RICO from the man himself
« Reply #10 on: February 27, 2008, 10:49:34 AM »
quote:
SO Greg you are telling me that 40 to 50 years ago drillers were using weight holes? As well as PLACING pins in the middle of the palms? REALLY? I call BULLS**T.

Now, granted I have said numerous times, it is merely a tag for a popular layout and I did not invent it, as I am given credit for, but to make a blatantly ignorant statement as this, well is just that, IGNORANT.

Seeing that I have been around for a few years and am somewhat of a historian, as well as DRILLED a few bowling balls in my time, I know that weight holes WERE NOT previlent until the mid to late 70's and if I remember CORRECTLY, PINS were not present until, oh EARLY 80's in Hammers or Angles?

So how could you use a 'layout', that utilizes a PIN (which is a 2-piece core), CG and a WEIGHT HOLE at 6 3/4" 40 to 50 years AGO? Ya they knew a lot about asymmetry back then, huh.
Seriously, it is amazing how petty you guys are...

Sorry for the rant...
--------------------
Ric Hamlin
Pacific Northwest Product Specialist
Brunswick Bowling


"The effect of static weights, in ball reaction, is the equivalent of removing the floor mats, from your SUV, to get better gas mileage."

www.BrunswickBowling.com
www.BrunswickInsiders.com
www.DBKMiniCamp.com


   So, the advent of offset weight blocks necessitated the weight shift, and/or balance hole to retain legal status. This changes the actual layout..........how?   LOL. This slays me.



--------------------
If yer arm don't hurt ya ain't shiftin it right!
 

RESEARCH!   Don't be a maroon!!.


 
AllBowling.com Off-Ramp!           

Greg T

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 19916
  • Collateral Damage
Re: RICO from the man himself
« Reply #11 on: February 27, 2008, 11:23:42 AM »

 I don't understand? LOL. I understand all too well. Bringing up a 30 year old layout brings fame a fortune to a discussion board member. Besides, arent you one of cgnomaddah gang? So who cares where the cg is placed and whether or not there even IS a cg? Given that it doesnt matter takes us back to the age of urethane which takes us back to the standard layout. Pin in palm. Ingenious!!




--------------------
If yer arm don't hurt ya ain't shiftin it right!
 

RESEARCH!   Don't be a maroon!!.


 
AllBowling.com Off-Ramp!           

Russell

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5121
Re: RICO from the man himself
« Reply #12 on: February 27, 2008, 11:33:28 AM »
quote:

 I don't understand? LOL. I understand all too well. Bringing up a 30 year old layout brings fame a fortune to a discussion board member. Besides, arent you one of cgnomaddah gang? So who cares where the cg is placed and whether or not there even IS a cg? Given that it doesnt matter takes us back to the age of urethane which takes us back to the standard layout. Pin in palm. Ingenious!!




--------------------
If yer arm don't hurt ya ain't shiftin it right!
 

RESEARCH!   Don't be a maroon!!.


 



Greg it's about altering core dynamics.  The pin in palm layout makes the RG in the core as low as possible, all the while keeping the diff intact for flare.  This creates a new tendency of the core to find it's PSA a little faster, thus making the ball roll quicker.

With the older balls the intention was different, there were only static weights, no cores.
--------------------
http://www.myspace.com/rlrussell

The artist formerly known as "jabroni"

Greg T

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 19916
  • Collateral Damage
Re: RICO from the man himself
« Reply #13 on: February 27, 2008, 11:41:37 AM »
quote:


Greg it's about altering core dynamics.  The pin in palm layout makes the RG in the core as low as possible, all the while keeping the diff intact for flare.  This creates a new tendency of the core to find it's PSA a little faster, thus making the ball roll quicker.

With the older balls the intention was different, there were only static weights, no cores.
--------------------
http://www.myspace.com/rlrussell

The artist formerly known as "jabroni"


  Yup. I know this. All i am saying is that naming an old layout after someone who decided to begin using it again is rather silly. I never said it wasnt effective. I understand the differences in the core dynamics. All i'm saying is that pin in pal has been used for many many years, and at one time was just the standard layout for any given ball. So, the cores may have changed, but this is still an old layout.



--------------------
If yer arm don't hurt ya ain't shiftin it right!
 

RESEARCH!   Don't be a maroon!!.


 
AllBowling.com Off-Ramp!           

Russell

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5121
Re: RICO from the man himself
« Reply #14 on: February 27, 2008, 11:48:09 AM »
quote:
quote:


Greg it's about altering core dynamics.  The pin in palm layout makes the RG in the core as low as possible, all the while keeping the diff intact for flare.  This creates a new tendency of the core to find it's PSA a little faster, thus making the ball roll quicker.

With the older balls the intention was different, there were only static weights, no cores.
--------------------
http://www.myspace.com/rlrussell

The artist formerly known as "jabroni"


  Yup. I know this. All i am saying is that naming an old layout after someone who decided to begin using it again is rather silly. I never said it wasnt effective. I understand the differences in the core dynamics. All i'm saying is that pin in pal has been used for many many years, and at one time was just the standard layout for any given ball. So, the cores may have changed, but this is still an old layout.



--------------------
If yer arm don't hurt ya ain't shiftin it right!
 

RESEARCH!   Don't be a maroon!!.


 



No...the old layout you're referring to was putting the WEIGHT in the palm.  3-piece pancake balls don't have a "core" therefore no pin.  They might have marked one but it was not party of the dynamics....only for show.  Those were not "layouts", merely making the ball legal w/o a hole.  The point of the pin in palm layout we have today IS for there to be a weight hole, it completes the puzzle, thus making it different.
--------------------
http://www.myspace.com/rlrussell

The artist formerly known as "jabroni"