Guys, Im just wondering if RICO layout is suitable for stroker, tweener or is it just suitable for cranker only?

Thanks in advance

They are not under my name, but pro shops who believe in altering statics to fine tune reaction are ALL over the country! 

REgards,

Luckylefty
PS, again I would love to see someone Impending/Rico/other followers buy this ball and try to use on light volume of oil vs the same ball with a starting top of 3.  It's cheap.

It would be cool to see both ways.

Same surface one with ending top one without same drilling.   Then adjust surface to see if a surface alteration can compensate for 3 ounces different of ending top and bottom! 

Yay.

Regards,

Luckylefty

Bat,

I did see that before.

1. I didn't buy it! Because I had seen another one which I can't find now where a player first threw positive created a burn and then negative.  It was not convincing because of the order.  The second ball after friction was created turned back strongly to the hole.

2.  Oh, by the way I have a ball drilled pin over bridge and cg negative about an inch or so.  It is very interesting and similar to the experiment above.  If I come in after an evening league by about the 3rd game I cannot be beat once this ball starts working.  It pushes very well thru the drying mids and goes very straight to it's breakpoint except for as the friction slowly increases on the left in the late mids I finally get a couple of boards of midlane.  I have then taken this ball to league and it has been absolutely worthless.  No recovery and no midlane.  (As you all know we have quite a bit less friction from the lane bed surface and also more oil on our side.

I am in the casual process of redrilling to be straight up over the bridge and the cg on grip center to contrast the midlane from the drilling.  (To see if it will work in the more liquid league oil shot).

3.  Even Just has admitted that cg's are 7% of reaction versus "nomaddeh"

4.  This example of the linked for sale ball on ebay is about serious ending bottom weight on an already early rolling ball.  I have known many good righties who were bowling with bottom weight balls and have been disappointed.  Not as serious on the left I don't believe because of our heavier midlane oil and lack of lane bed friction!  I have intentionally used balls with slight bottom to smooth things out!
I expect an ending difference between the balls of 3 ounces.  It should be interesting.

Thanks Impending!

Regards,

Luckylefty


 

I also find that ball rolls as good as any I have and I think sometimes it's the best reaction. The DeTerminator doesn't factor in coverstock, so you just have to use the info for core strength and alter the cover to best fit conditions!

Does this mean you are not doing the study you alluded to above?

Bruns/Just/Rico now states 7% factor not "nomaddeh".  I believe him now.  I love every advantage!

Regards,

Luckylefty
PS  Note I have seen two studies of pin over and cg on both sides.  One verified what I have seen one didn't.
PPS As to current pin over negative CG, I like taking their loose change after league!  Push!

But I rely on your posts for entertainment....

Sort of like Profootballtalk.com, prior to being sold to NBC.

S^2

Edit...

Reply -->  Rely

Now it makes a bit more sense