win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: CG above the fingers  (Read 2375 times)

kidlost2000

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5789
CG above the fingers
« on: January 18, 2010, 06:50:23 PM »


Anybody have any experiences inverting the ball and putting the cg above the fingers and keeping the pin below or just above the fingers.

Mainly in reference to short pin balls with light top weight. Hadn't seen it in years but was wondering if anybody had tried it on newer equipment?




.....CG...
...LF...RF....
.....pin....



....thumb.....
--------------------
" men lie, women lie, numbers don''t "
…… you can't  add a physics term to a bowling term and expect it to mean something.

 

JohnP

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5819
Re: CG above the fingers
« Reply #1 on: January 19, 2010, 09:19:44 AM »
If you're dealing with symmetric cores forget about where the cg is located as long as you can make the static weights legal.  All the ending statics will have a major affect on is balance hole size and location.  With balls with a marked MB you'll have to take that into consideration and I really don't know how a MB in the area the layout you're inquiring about requires would affect the reaction.  --  JohnP

Goof1073

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2433
Re: CG above the fingers
« Reply #2 on: January 19, 2010, 10:54:22 AM »
quote:
Hadn't seen it in years but was wondering if anybody had tried it on newer equipment?
That drilling sounds like the old 315degree layout that was also known as a Danny Wiseman layout for a while:

http://www.bowlingknowledge.com/tips/mario/mario_315degreelayout.htm

I personally haven't tried it in a long time...
--------------------
-Chris: DJ's Pro Shop : Auburn, MA

kidlost2000

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5789
Re: CG above the fingers
« Reply #3 on: January 19, 2010, 12:21:18 PM »
Thanks g1073 that is what I was referring to mainly was the Wiseman pattern but wasn't sure if anybody remembered it. lol

Great link.
--------------------
" men lie, women lie, numbers don't "
…… you can't  add a physics term to a bowling term and expect it to mean something.