Mo's dual angle layout system confuses the heck out of me.
I normally just follow the manufacturer's instructions only taking into account pin location and distance to pap, general cg placement (label, stacked, leverage), and mb location and distance to pap on asymmetrical balls. I normally just place weight holes, if needed, on the val anywhere from 1 to 2 inches below my pap.
Is the dual angle technique really that much better to justfiy spending the time learning the layout? Seems like a lot of hype to me...
Edited on 5/5/2009 10:18 AM