I was discussing asymmetrical drilling with a customer today. He brought in a Shift, drilled elsewhere that wasn't moving. The mass bias was placed in the "strong" position. Now drilling instructions suggest pin placements by distance from PAP not just pin under ring, pin over bridge, etc. Why do they make mass bias suggestions with vague strong position, arc position, roll position? Mass bias placement depends on PAP just like the pin. It also depends on rev rate and how much the ball flares. Draw a line from pin to mass bias. The PAP has to migrate past that line before the core enhances motion. In this case the ball was drilled low flare and the customers PAP was 5-5/8" over. His PAP never made it to "the line of most resistance," therefore, the core never took affect. I won't blame the driller. He just did what the customer asked for. Actually this is an effective drilling if you intend to take the asymmetry out of the picture. The fact of the matter is that the drilling instruction said that this is the position for a strong reaction, which is misleading. I know MoRich gives mass bias suggestion as distances from PAP. Why aren't other companies following suit?
--------------------
Where is the bait? I'm goin' to jail!!! - Chocolate GAYzer