Unless you put that on a stronger ball. I think if you want predictability and a go-to control ball, use the 2 inch from axis on a misfit solid and change surface to fit your need.
Thats why I suggested the Marauder as a possibility. If the ball is shiny, then it wont lose all "pop" on the backend. He said he wants smooth and controllable and it doesnt get much more controllable and predictable than putting the pin close to the PAP.
If he wants to go up the boards, then pin at 2 - 2.5 inches from PAP is ticket. If he wants something with the reaction but able to play deeper, then he may need to go more towards 3 - 3.5 inches from PAP.
Another thing is that you are not going to do a 2 inch pin with a sanded surface unless he has ball speed. Needs to do something with a sheen if not shiny surface to still get through the fronts well but the pin close to PAP to control the backend.
As far as weight holes, I do not have much experience with weight holes in a ball with the pin at 2 inches and cg near center of grip. I now have two balls laid out this way; Black Ice and now the 300C Solid and neither have a weight hole. Black Ice rolled like Jesus on shorter patterns and have not thrown the 300 yet. Plan on doing a comparison in the next week or so.
The main thing we need to know is: what is this guys specs (ball speed, PAP, rev rate)? Then we can narrow it down as a 2 inch pin to PAP may not work for someone with a slower ball speed.