win a ball from Bowling.com
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]

Author Topic: Centrifugal much?  (Read 3676 times)

hammermike2000

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 767
Centrifugal much?
« on: December 27, 2005, 01:49:41 PM »
Why am I not hearing very much about this ball??

I cannot believe the power and drive this ball gives me, even on a med-light condition (if you move far enough in).  The hitting power of this ball is really unmatched.  BTW - mass bias in strong = a s**tload of motion!
--------------------
Mike LeViner

BOWL N.C. TOUGH SHOTS TOUR
Logged

 

Jeffrevs

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11890
Re: Centrifugal much?
« Reply #16 on: January 04, 2006, 10:55:58 AM »
quote:
quote:
No


understood!

what is the mass bias strength/spin time on the CM ?
--------------------
JEFF
"A Mayhem and a couple of Hercs.......uhm.....Nice!.."


FORGET IT.............I GOT IT...5.8
--------------------
JEFF
"A Mayhem and a couple of Hercs.......uhm.....Nice!.."
Logged

newguy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1079
Re: Centrifugal much?
« Reply #17 on: January 04, 2006, 11:57:28 AM »
We use geometry not densities and inertia to determine the shape and placement. Other companies use densities (pucks and flip blocks) to create the asymmetrical
Logged

Jeffrevs

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11890
Re: Centrifugal much?
« Reply #18 on: January 04, 2006, 01:19:31 PM »
quote:
We use geometry not densities and inertia to determine the shape and placement. Other companies use densities (pucks and flip blocks) to create the asymmetrical


don't they all have to come into play though ?  

(NOT BEING A SMARTA_$$....honest question )
--------------------
JEFF
"A Mayhem and a couple of Hercs.......uhm.....Nice!.."
Logged

newguy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1079
Re: Centrifugal much?
« Reply #19 on: January 04, 2006, 01:52:18 PM »
No, an imbalance achieved through the use of densities (pucks and weight block inserts) is not in the true sense an asymmetrical core, it is a biased by density core. I would assume that all the asymmetrical apologist would already know this or have a reason why they are built as such. True asymmetrical is just that, a shape that has no 2 sides the same. It should spin about a centrifugal axis that is not influenced by weight densities just shape. Our CM after drilling will still spin about the C.A.P and as you can see our Z axis value is not as high as the others yet it still holds it's preferred spin axis even after holes have been placed in it.
Logged

tekneek

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5657
Re: Centrifugal much?
« Reply #20 on: January 04, 2006, 02:44:34 PM »
grrrrrrr, this is getting to complex for my feebbbllle mind. All I know is it works for me. I'll leave the tech stuff to the tech guru's.
--------------------
Steve
Stars and Strikes Pro Shop

Edited on 1/4/2006 3:34 PM
Logged
Steve
Leading Edge Pro Shop
Radical Bowling Technologies Advisory Staff
brinkley2223@yahoo.com
512-755-2947

tekneek

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5657
Re: Centrifugal much?
« Reply #21 on: January 04, 2006, 03:13:03 PM »
motion, physics, and the E=mc2 WAS NEVER IN MY VOCAB, I can barely pronounce it let alone spell them, or explain em. lol But I have been known to roll a ball, if that counts and on occasions punch holes in em.
--------------------
Steve
Stars and Strikes Pro Shop
Logged
Steve
Leading Edge Pro Shop
Radical Bowling Technologies Advisory Staff
brinkley2223@yahoo.com
512-755-2947

manu57

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 308
Re: Centrifugal much?
« Reply #22 on: January 04, 2006, 05:26:01 PM »
I know Phil gives a lot of tech info,  but that is truly why Dyno is a superior product to most if not all of his competitors.  Not only can they design a ball, but they can back it up with hard facts.  It truly is a "whole" new concept, but this one really works.
--------------------
The only difference between Genius and Stupidity is Genius has its Limits
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]
« previous next »