BallReviews
Equipment Boards => Dyno-Thane => Topic started by: Sir Bowl-A-Lot on January 16, 2006, 02:08:11 AM
-
Would this be an ideal choice on dry lanes?
--------------------
Trusted BallReviews.com member since 3/31/2003 (since 2001 under the now late user name buzzsaw16...back when I used nothing but Lane#1)
-
For a speed dominent player like yourself it would be a better choice than a Tropical Storm or other similar balls...IMHO. Is it an ideal dry lane ball for you? Don't know as I have not seen you throw the ball.
I will say that for my style that the Crisis Pearl is a really nice *drier* lane ball as I rarely see true fried lanes.
--------------------
-Chris: DJ's Pro Shop : Auburn, MA
-
This ball seems to have/be such a tricky problem.
Since it's relativity new, that is, not designed and made when the original Crisis was done by the Storm people, I wonder what the coverstock actually is. The predominant Storm coverstock when this was designed, by Phil or his Dyno-Thane people was the Monsoon coverstock which, if you look at the Hot Rod Pro STock and the Hot Rod Pro Stock pearl, is a pretty strong cover.
BTM reviewed this ball as high/excellent for medium oil and medium-light, both, a pretty unusual and rare recommendation. They also reviewed the above 2 Hot Rods in a similar, if not identical manner. (I'm ignoring BTM's evaluation numbers here, because I do NOT want to start an off-topic agruement or discussion.)
The CP's core RG is medium to medium-high, around 2.58 and the RG differential is medium low, around 033. So, it's capable of 2-4" of flare.
BTM's torque evaluation also indicated it had the potential to be a very good control ball for wet/drys, EVEN THOUGH it is apearl resin ball.
Based on all the above, I really wanted to try one, but the occasion never presented itself.
--------------------
"...for advice is a dangerous gift, even from the wise to the wise...."
J. R. R. Tolkien