Author Topic: Dynothane Underated? (Read 4451 times)

manu57 · « **on:** September 11, 2005, 04:00:31 PM »

There are some manufacturers out there that have become very popular lately with "new" technology that is not all that new or special. Bowlers are hot and cold on the Epoxy ball, others are not seeing a "hole" lot of difference between their old equipment and the new MoRich Vanguard cores, and for that matter Track is "starting a revolution" with basically a new marketing campaign.

Dynothane, with the release of the Centrifugal Mass, may change the way we look at Asymmetrical balls forever, but there are very few threads about it, and no one seems to be really excited about it. It does not seem like Phil and his staff get the recognition that others like Del Warren, Mo Pinel, etc. do. If the CM ball does what they are predicting, I hope Dynothane not only benefits from sales, but also be recognized as being more of a technological leader in the industry.

Is the lack of enthusiasm toward Dyothane because they do not have the same large scale distribution the other big manufactures have? Or is there marketing team just not as strong? Or does there product just not match up with bowlers like what else is out there. What do you guys think?
--------------------
The only difference between Genius and Stupidity is Geniu
s has its Limits

Edited on 9/12/2005 0:31 AM

Jeffrevs · « **Reply #16 on:** September 14, 2005, 10:00:15 AM »

quote:
42 lines of response to several questions and you revert back to the same old info.

Maybe, Phil...it's because it was the first time I had read the thread ?! And....that's the point that interested me most! You must admit, ...this IS quite a reach for you ...yes ?

Go back and see the prior post...I edited it so you can see what I was referring to......

quote:
I'm not the one that keeps buying the new and imporved version of last weeks greatest hits!!!!

Either am I !!!!!!!!!!!
--------------------
JEFF
"...each anothers audience outside the gilded cage.."

Edited on 9/14/2005 10:04 AM

manu57 · « **Reply #17 on:** September 14, 2005, 08:00:49 PM »

Thanks newguy,If you are willing to put your name on it, it must be something you are proud of. Some people cannot take change that well. We'll see what happens when it is released.
--------------------
The only difference between Genius and Stupidity is Genius has its Limits

onlybowling · « **Reply #18 on:** September 15, 2005, 01:45:37 AM »

Frankly, I am really enjoying the idea that the owner of a ball company actually responds to real individuals via this forum. My feeling is that Phil is really just like any of us in that he is doing his job to the best of his ability, and he is trying to nurture and grow his company.

It seems to me that other ball companies offer asymetrical cores in their top of the line equipment. And a large percentage of balls sold are of the asymetrical core design. Am I wrong in thinking that the lack of a high end asymetrical design could prevent sales of ... any brand of ball?

When comparing symetrical cored balls, Dynothane is second to none. I am thinking that the new asymetrical will be in the same boat. I don't think Phil does his job half way. I expect the new line of asymetrical balls will offer the bowler who prefers this type of ball another high end choice that is equal to any other available today.

--------------------
OnlyBowling

newguy · « **Reply #19 on:** September 15, 2005, 10:32:00 AM »

Amen. That is why I have held off, cause I have not found one worth of my blessing. We have tested this avenue of core design for over 8 years now. I just didn't have the combination of core and cover that would require less hype to sell it and gave more performance long enough to warrant a launch. Symmetricals worked in my opinion as well and lasted longer into the session. I feel we have one now that can stand up to the Phil test. Only time will tell.

cooksey · « **Reply #20 on:** September 15, 2005, 10:41:26 AM »

Phil I for one am a firm believer in your company and 99% of my equipment is Dynothane. As I work in a pro shop I reccomend you balls to several of your customers and most of them always love the equipment. I have said it before. I have thrown most all other companies equipment over the years and to be Dynothane offers the most consistent balls on the market as far as predictability and for me that means allot. Can't wait for the new release.

Thanks, cooksey
--------------------
" Focus the next shot is critical"

AIM:johncooksey24

Edited on 9/15/2005 10:35 AM

cpo_bee · « **Reply #21 on:** September 15, 2005, 11:37:11 AM »

I'm not a member of the ball of the month club as you can see by my profile. I keep wanting to throw my other equipment, but I always keep going back to my Thing. Consistent roll, it rolls exactly how I throw it, if I'm throwing it good, I score, if I am inconsistent, I don't. I have a single drill red/black Vendetta that a teammate gave me, drilling it up soon and I have confidence that it will do exactly as advertised also. I'm looking for a ball for med-heavy synthetics, looks like one of the Energy balls is in my future. You and your company do a fine job, Phil.

Author Topic: Dynothane Underated? (Read 4451 times)

manu57

Dynothane Underated?

Jeffrevs

Re: Dynothane Underated?

manu57

Re: Dynothane Underated?

onlybowling

Re: Dynothane Underated?

newguy

Re: Dynothane Underated?

cooksey

Re: Dynothane Underated?

cpo_bee

Re: Dynothane Underated?