Looking at Dyno-Thane's site it states that the CM handles more oil than the PE. How is that possible?
The CM has a reactive cover and a core RG of 2.51 with a Diff of 0.055.
The PE has a particle cover and a core RG is 2.49 with a Diff of 0.057.
Both balls have the same box finish.
It has been my understanding that dull particle covers are better suited for heavy oil than dull reactive covers (excluding the new epoxy resins). Also, a lower RG gets the ball into a roll a bit sooner which is also good on heavier patterns.
So what's the deal? Is the scale for the CM on Dyno-Thane's site a typo? If not, this reminds me of the Anomaly when they touted that as their ball to conquer the flood. I fell into that trap and bought one only to find out it was a medium condition ball at best. The Anomaly was the only ball that I have ever disliked from Dyno-Thane by the way.
--------------------
Trusted BallReviews.com member since 3/31/2003 (since 2001 under the now late user name buzzsaw16...back when I used nothing but Lane#1)
Edited on 1/5/2006 7:29 AM
