Kendog, there is a informative article in "Bowling this Month" magazine from Jun or Jul 2003 (I forgot which) by Mo Pinel that thoroughly explains asymmetrical vs symmetrical layouts. I agree with most everyone's comments (including MB having more influence than cg) except the last half of Mr Marlowe's post (Posted: 6/10/2004 3:12 PM) leaves this subject a little unfinished is all. Respectively, I think there is just more to it than that. Symmetrical core balls really don't have a "mass bias" because their preferred spin axis migrates towards the thumbhole after drilling when spun on a free spin machine... confirmed both of mine (Storm's Too Hot and Power Bolt) on our house's free spin machine... My understanding of mass-biased balls is that the purpose is allow drillers the ability to finetune the shape of the hook (hockey stick vs arc) by forcing the ball to stand up specifically where driller intends it to. Coverstock and surface will be main influence here though.
I would place pin 3 3/8s from PAP and kick out the CG 2-2.5 ins from gripline put the balance hole on VAL with zero pitch... should grab midlane better with continuation on back end on light carrydown. According to the company website it is a Skid/Snap pearl reactive ball don't expect lots of Arc here.