win a ball from Bowling.com
« previous next »
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: BWP vs Total NV  (Read 961 times)

bowl4jc

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 258
BWP vs Total NV
« on: January 14, 2008, 02:57:10 AM »
What are the differences in reactions and what conditions these two balls will cover?  Drilled the same let me know

Thanks
Logged

 

fuel3331

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 121
Re: BWP vs Total NV
« Reply #1 on: January 14, 2008, 03:30:07 PM »
BWP revs a touch earlier than the TNV and has a significantly stronger backend reaction. While each ball has an angular breakpoint, the BWP is more pronounced giving the ball 3-5 boards more overall hook. Each piece depending on layout & surface prep could cover the lighter side of medium to medium-heavy lanes. Unless you have no hand, I can't imagine either being useful on drier conditions.
Logged

tdub36tjt

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1542
Re: BWP vs Total NV
« Reply #2 on: January 14, 2008, 04:20:02 PM »
I am surprised to see someone say the BWP is stronger than a TNV. I have only thrown one BWP and I have thrown numerous TNV. The one BWP I threw was significantly weaker and later than any of the TNV I have thrown. I have thrown a TNV with a similar layout as to what the BWP has.

quote:
BWP revs a touch earlier than the TNV and has a significantly stronger backend reaction. While each ball has an angular breakpoint, the BWP is more pronounced giving the ball 3-5 boards more overall hook. Each piece depending on layout & surface prep could cover the lighter side of medium to medium-heavy lanes. Unless you have no hand, I can't imagine either being useful on drier conditions.
Logged
Pages: [1]
« previous next »