Solid according to BTM

Yeah, its certain that its GBV 12.7, but alot of people say its a solid version instead of the pearl cover used on the Angular One.  BTM says its a solid version, but there isn't anything official from ebonite that supports or concurs with the remark.  Thats why its confusing.  


--------------------
www.bowlingsolutions.com

Move left, hook it more.....

Tommy Jones and Kenny Simard are Gamecock fans...are you???

We shall now refer a 4-bagger as a hambone...Mark it down the revolution has started!

Edited on 5/16/2008 7:33 PM

Ebonite likes to miss to mention whether the coverstock is a solid or pearl - you cannot be sure until you either see it in real life or get a valid desription.
I remember the SR300 - it was advertsised to have GB10.7, "the same coverstock as The One". Great, I thought, with the higher RG core, this solid ball should be what you are looking for. But then, opeining the box - it was a pearl ball! Thanks Ebonite for not telling it!

Beware!
--------------------
DizzyFugu - Reporting from Germany

Confused by bowling?
Check out BR.com's vault of wisdom: the unofficial FAQ section
Secrets revealed: What's a fugu?

From the picture I thought, too, it was solid. But it is definitively a pearl, any SR300 I have seen so far. It is not the kind of translucent candy pearl, rather a kind of mother-pearl shine. But it is not a solid ball.

Here's mine (sold):
http://www.putfile.com/pic/3473654
--------------------
DizzyFugu - Reporting from Germany

Confused by bowling?
Check out BR.com's vault of wisdom: the unofficial FAQ section
Secrets revealed: What's a fugu?