Which should i use, i like to open up, i stand about 20-25. Lots of rev and slow ball speed. I need a ball for dry lanes, 32-35 ft oil, dry lanes.

ICE.

Is the Ice really that good What kinda drilling am i looking at ?

OH ya, sorry but forgot to add that i want to have a controlled arc, not really a SS reaction. (got too many balls to do that)

thanks y'all

Ice is pretty smooth for me on Medium to Light conditions. On dry it hooks to early and hits weak.

Hope this helps

Dan
--------------------
Brunswick.....There is no other option
¡Viva la nación de Brunswick!

xwenhan,

As others have already said....and I'm sure you suspect....the Ice is the ball you want, with a tad bit of polish!

However, I have to disagree with those who say the KI pearl was junk! It's all about the operator! That is not a true pearl. It is pearlized, but I look at it as a strong medium oil ball. It gives great carry, and I have scored well with it in many tournaments, especially Carolier lanes in N.J.

The core in it is unique, and very continuous. This is NOT a ball that needs a lot of revs. Nuff said.

Have to agree with Jesse James. The KI series was not all that it was hyped to be, but it wasn't bad either. The sanded is a great medium condition ball and the pearl is nice for playing up the oil line on mediums. I've seen both used to score quite well when prepped properly and thrown on the right conditions. Again, they were not the outstanding balls that Ebonite touted them to be, but they were not at all bad.
--------------------
I can't bowl 300, but I can bench 345 : )
 I provide the muscle for the Fellowship of the Saws