win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: NVS vs BWP on medium oil  (Read 1233 times)

turbostrike

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 2
NVS vs BWP on medium oil
« on: July 16, 2007, 02:37:53 AM »
I own a TNV for a few months and average about 180. Love TNV because it can go long hence play a tight line to get consistent backend, and my rev is low-medium (2.4 seconds to reach pin). From Ebonite website, it seems like NVS is a better version of TNV. I wanted to get TNV but my proshop driller told me to consider BWP. The league that I bowl is usually medium oil condition and become dry fast. Would appreciate it if anyone can advise which ball (TNV or BWP) would be more suitable for the medium-dry lane and my long-low-rev-stroker style? Thanks so much, Sean.

 

sep900

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 29
Re: NVS vs BWP on medium oil
« Reply #1 on: July 17, 2007, 10:54:41 AM »
If money isn't a concern to you, NVS would be a good addition to ur TNV in my opinion. Then you'd have 2 of the same core with different coverstock to take on different lanes, even the varying medium lanes that your house shot may have.

I've seen BWP, i think it reacts very closely to the TNV, so I don't see a point in getting the bwp unless u replace ur tnv right?

turbostrike

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 2
Re: NVS vs BWP on medium oil
« Reply #2 on: July 19, 2007, 11:03:21 AM »
Another bowler offered the idea of Fury Pearl. My guess is its behaviour should be closer to NVS. If that is the case, which ball is better on medium oil? Thanks.