win a ball from Bowling.com
« previous next »
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: Phazed Bomber Reactive Cover  (Read 1048 times)

dtp

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 77
Phazed Bomber Reactive Cover
« on: January 24, 2007, 05:07:04 AM »
How strong is the coverstock on the Overtime relative to their other reactive coverstocks?
--------------------
N.C. State Wolfpack
Logged

 

leftehh- LG

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1079
Re: Phazed Bomber Reactive Cover
« Reply #1 on: January 24, 2007, 01:35:16 PM »
pretty strong, the bigtime sanded has particle to it to make it grab more through the oil and the bigtime pearl will skid more through the lane. This ball will fit in between most of the "Time Series", but still a STRONG ball.

 I tihnk they should make an overtime pearl or particle pearl!
--------------------
Bowl to Win!

Edited on 1/24/2007 2:34 PM
Logged

dtp

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 77
Re: Phazed Bomber Reactive Cover
« Reply #2 on: January 24, 2007, 08:45:46 PM »
I know that the XXXcel had the same reactive cover. I was wondering if y'all think that the Overtime is stronger overall (given that all things...drilling, etc are equal) than the XXXcel?
--------------------
N.C. State Wolfpack
Logged

dizzyfugu

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7606
Re: Phazed Bomber Reactive Cover
« Reply #3 on: January 25, 2007, 02:27:30 AM »
Bomber reactive NEEDS oil, at least in the matte finish on the XXXcel. Reads the lane very well. I guess the difference between XXXcel and Overtime is not much, concerning lane conditions, you just have a slightly more powerful, asymmetrical core in the XXXcel.
--------------------

DizzyFugu - Reporting from Germany
Team X website & more about me
"Put some make-up on your face
 Make this world a better place!"
Kahimi Karie, 'Good morning world'
Logged
DizzyFugu ~ Reporting from Germany
Pages: [1]
« previous next »