win a ball from Bowling.com
« previous next »
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: The One RG & Diff  (Read 1456 times)

v02maxlefty

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 158
The One RG & Diff
« on: December 02, 2005, 06:11:14 AM »
Why is there such a drastic difference between a 16lb The One Rg 2.51 Diff .037 and a 15lb The One Rg 2.46 Diff .056?  Seems like two different balls, with the 15lb hooking earlier and with more flip.
Logged

 

J_Mac

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6778
Re: The One RG & Diff
« Reply #1 on: December 02, 2005, 02:18:50 PM »
There are two sides to this discussion.   Some are claiming that it makes a difference, while other are arguing that the differential differences don't make much of a difference in a ball that has this significant of a MB differential.

I say it's not going to make a vast difference due to the powerful MB.

--------------------
American beer is like making love in a canoe. It's f*cking close to water. - Monty Python

If God had intended us to drink beer, He would have given us stomachs. - David Daye
Logged

shelley

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9655
Re: The One RG & Diff
« Reply #2 on: December 02, 2005, 10:47:06 PM »
That's really weird.  Are they drilled the same?  Similar styles for the two bowlers?  Has anyone considered that it's a misprint on the Ebonite website?  If the 16# diff were really 0.057 instead of 0.037, then the numbers would be reasonable.  As printed, it would seem that there are two different cores at work.

SH
Logged

Strider

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6759
Re: The One RG & Diff
« Reply #3 on: December 03, 2005, 10:42:57 AM »
http://www.ballreviews.com/Forum/Replies.asp?TopicID=103899&ForumID=5&CategoryID=2

Especially read the reply by Ronald Hickland, the ball's designer.
--------------------
Penn State Proud

Ron Clifton's Bowling Tip Archive
Logged

shelley

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9655
Re: The One RG & Diff
« Reply #4 on: December 03, 2005, 11:16:30 AM »
quote:
Especially read the reply by Ronald Hickland, the ball's designer.


Thanks.  I guess it's not a misprint.  Another user mentioned that while the core shapes are the same, the internal compositions are not.  Interesting.

SH
Logged
Pages: [1]
« previous next »