BallReviews
Equipment Boards => Ebonite => Topic started by: JJ on April 14, 2006, 01:26:28 AM
-
Would appreciate any input on these two balls from people that have them. I have the xx cel and this ball is great but very strong even at 2000 Abralon. I have a cross fire coming but I am also interested in a v2 sweet or sanded for medium/light conditions (THS). Which do you think would be the better one of the two balls? Stats in profile. Thank you.
JJ
-
Thanks for the replies. After further review the V2 sanded sounds too strong for what I am looking for. Then to make matters worse BTM rates the Cross Fire (17/13/41) weaker than the V2 Sweet (14.5/15.5/45). Ebonite rates the Cross Fire a little stronger than V2 Sweet. They show the Cross Fire with a length of 16.5 and hook 21.75. They list the V2 Sweet with a length of 18.2 and hook at 20.50. I don't know if there would be enough difference between the Cross Fire and V2 sweet to have them both. Has anyone thrown both of these balls? Thanks.
JJ
-
You should really reconsider about that v2 sanded. Better Grab one before you cant find one anywhere!
--------------------
LG
-
Q: if i added soem surface to a v2 sweet would it react the same as a v2 sanded?? Cuz technically they are both the modified nitro core and trimax solid reactive coverstock...It would make sense because the v2 sanded is so hard to come by nowadays.
Edited on 4/17/2006 3:11 AM
-
If you took the polish off it, it would be really close. I had a sweet, wife has a Sanded, I took off the polish and had a close reaction as hers. We do have different styles, so it was hard to say exact, but it was close. I think, with some adjustment, you could make it really close, JMO.
--------------------
AZ Guy aka: R & L Bowlers Pro
rlbowlerspro@cox.net
www.rlbowlerspro.com
Sleep is over rated.