win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: why was the striking motion a dud??  (Read 5803 times)

Aloarjr810

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2149
  • Alley Katz Strike!
why was the striking motion a dud??
« on: March 16, 2009, 01:10:08 AM »
I just recently got a striking motion (Posted a Review) and I thought it was a ok ball.

My Review Here

I got this reply in another forum

Not trying to be a jerk, but this ball is discontinued now. If you liked it you can bye them cheap. My distributor is selling the for a very cheap price. All companies have a swing and miss. I think this was a big swing and miss for Ebonite.
 
I had all ready knew of the little interest everyone had in this ball.

But what was so bad about it that no one wanted it? was it just too ordinary? too strong? too weak? etc.


--------------------
Aloarjr810
----------
Click For My Grip
Aloarjr810
----------
Click For My Grip

 

jbuzz31

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1174
Re: why was the striking motion a dud??
« Reply #1 on: March 16, 2009, 10:07:18 AM »
bad name, bad marketing, lackluster color scheme so there was no shelf appeal.  and the only time i saw one on t.v was when Shannon Pluhoskey was using it as a SPARE ball.
--------------------
Ive Eaten From The Insane Root That Imprisons Reason

Dan Belcher

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3954
Re: why was the striking motion a dud??
« Reply #2 on: March 16, 2009, 10:17:45 AM »
I despised the ball when I threw it at a Demo Day.  Even with a weak drill (based on my PAP, it was just a pin-over-bridge layout) and a pretty smooth surface, the ball seemed to burn up the second it found friction, yet it also somehow managed to slide through oil and never really roll up through that either.  Even moving six or seven boards right of where I was with the Pin Slasher (a very, very good ball, for what it's worth), the Striking Motion still left the flattest 10 pins you've ever seen in your life.

leftyinsnellville

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2345
Re: why was the striking motion a dud??
« Reply #3 on: March 16, 2009, 10:21:17 AM »
quote:
bad name, bad marketing, lackluster color scheme so there was no shelf appeal.  and the only time i saw one on t.v was when Shannon Pluhoskey was using it as a SPARE ball.



+1

TheDude

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3170
Re: why was the striking motion a dud??
« Reply #4 on: March 16, 2009, 10:36:55 AM »
quote:
bad name, bad marketing, lackluster color scheme so there was no shelf appeal.  and the only time i saw one on t.v was when Shannon Pluhoskey was using it as a SPARE ball.
--------------------
Ive Eaten From The Insane Root That Imprisons Reason


+2
--------------------
Timothy @Juniors Pro-Shops
LaSalle, Quebec-Located inside Pont Mercier Lanes.
Edmonton, Alberta. -Located inside Ed's Rec Room.(WEST ED MALL)
Keep them honest!

Ebay store updated very often: http://stores.ebay.com/gumby3170
Timothy @Juniors Pro-Shops
LaSalle, Quebec-Located inside Pont Mercier Lanes.
Keep them honest!

Ebay store updated very often: http://stores.ebay.com/gumby3170?refid+store

erider

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 16
Re: why was the striking motion a dud??
« Reply #5 on: March 16, 2009, 11:26:07 AM »
I love this ball, drilled with
morich dual thumb, shot 804 with it, you are right, it does not hook a bunch.

LaneHammer20

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1710
Re: why was the striking motion a dud??
« Reply #6 on: March 16, 2009, 12:03:56 PM »
@ of my teamates in evansville have one, and to me it looks like a good ball. ! guy is a tweener and the other is a power stroker, and they both carry the house with it.
--------------------
What is sandbagging???


Aloarjr810

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2149
  • Alley Katz Strike!
Re: why was the striking motion a dud??
« Reply #7 on: March 16, 2009, 05:10:49 PM »
quote:
My opinion is that it was marked at a high price and it did not hook out the door.  The average bowler wants to see hook at that price point.  It doesn't seem to be a bad ball however.


Well that's what I thought was the problem. Since I didn't see any reviews that said it hooked so hard it cut a doughnut half way down the lane before it struck the pins.

Looks like just a good ball, their cheap now. Might be worth a second look.

--------------------
Aloarjr810
----------
Click For My Grip

Edited on 3/16/2009 5:13 PM
Aloarjr810
----------
Click For My Grip

EboHammer

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 73
Re: why was the striking motion a dud??
« Reply #8 on: March 16, 2009, 09:18:33 PM »
quote:
bad name, bad marketing, lackluster color scheme so there was no shelf appeal.  and the only time i saw one on t.v was when Shannon Pluhoskey was using it as a SPARE ball.
--------------------
Ive Eaten From The Insane Root That Imprisons Reason


I am still not trying to be a jerk (yes it was me on the other site).
But, I think the quoted response sums it up pretty well.  I do like Ebonite products and the company in general, just called it like I seen it on this ball.

jls

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18398
Re: why was the striking motion a dud??
« Reply #9 on: March 17, 2009, 10:38:51 AM »
Well the Striking Motion is now on closeout.
--------------------
jls

Aloarjr810

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2149
  • Alley Katz Strike!
Re: why was the striking motion a dud??
« Reply #10 on: March 17, 2009, 10:30:32 PM »
Well as a follow up I used this in our city tournament.after 9 games I shot 1802 scratch. I don't know just what the pattern was, it pretty flat. cashed in singles.

over the coarse of the tourn. I went from 9 to 13 at the arrows, out to about 5. if you look at the btm issue for this ball jan. 09,pg 26, in their ball tracking test results section. I was playing the same areas as the stroker and tweener in the chart.

And for league tonite i had a 654, the thing I'm seeing with this ball is control. It is very predictable, yes it's not hook monster. But it was hard hitting and carried the ten pin well.


--------------------
Aloarjr810
----------
Click For My Grip
Aloarjr810
----------
Click For My Grip

EboHammer

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 73
Re: why was the striking motion a dud??
« Reply #11 on: March 17, 2009, 11:37:21 PM »
quote:
Well as a follow up I used this in our city tournament.after 9 games I shot 1802 scratch. I don't know just what the pattern was, it pretty flat. cashed in singles.

over the coarse of the tourn. I went from 9 to 13 at the arrows, out to about 5. if you look at the btm issue for this ball jan. 09,pg 26, in their ball tracking test results section. I was playing the same areas as the stroker and tweener in the chart.

And for league tonite i had a 654, the thing I'm seeing with this ball is control. It is very predictable, yes it's not hook monster. But it was hard hitting and carried the ten pin well.


--------------------
Aloarjr810
----------
Click For My Grip


I am glad you have found a ball that you enjoy.  Who cares if I (or anyone else) likes it, as long as you do.  

Bowler19

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 433
Re: why was the striking motion a dud??
« Reply #12 on: March 19, 2009, 07:12:47 PM »
Is this a confirmed discontinue or rumor. I am not trying to point fingers at rumor making but it is just that the ball is fairly new on the market.
--------------------
Jason K
But be not afraid of greatness: some are born great, some achieve greatness, and some have greatness thrust upon them.-W. Shakespear

Jason @Juniors Pro-Shops
LaSalle, Quebec
Located inside Pont Mercier Lanes.
Edmonton, Alberta.
Located inside Ed's Rec Room.(WEST ED MALL)
King Of Roto-Grip In Canada.

www.juniorsproshop.com

themachine300

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1410
Re: why was the striking motion a dud??
« Reply #13 on: March 19, 2009, 07:49:26 PM »
Yeah its done, I guess lack of sales and dissapointing feedback from bowlers lead to it getting axed.  In other words....it sucked
--------------------
www.bowlingsolutions.com

Bowl to win!!!

Move left, hook it more.....

Tommy Jones and Kenny Simard are Gamecock fans...are you???
Philipp Hudak
Ebonite Amateur Staff
Bowl To Win!
#TeamEBI

PLM

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 112
Re: why was the striking motion a dud??
« Reply #14 on: March 19, 2009, 07:59:24 PM »
For what it is worth...
From what I saw in the video on Ebonite's website, the ball did not seem to finish very hard.  If you are looking for a ball to use in specific conditions (extreme wet/dry maybe), it looks like it might be a good choice.  This makes it a ball with a limited use, or at least it would be so for me.