win a ball from Bowling.com
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]

Author Topic: WHO HAS THE BEST PRICES ON BALLS...  (Read 3181 times)

Nodsleinad

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1184
WHO HAS THE BEST PRICES ON BALLS...
« on: July 30, 2003, 05:59:30 PM »
HIGH COST:
MO-RICH (Notice the word rich in there)
LANE 1: Their Logo is a Diamond....what do you expect.
Brunswick Technology Ventures: The long name justifies the high price.

Who do you feel is most reasonable and unreasonable in way of $$$$ spent

Nod

Edited on 7/31/2003 10:14 AM
Logged
LTBOCSFM

 

Gravy

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 162
Re: WHO HAS THE BEST PRICES ON BALLS...
« Reply #16 on: July 31, 2003, 08:55:16 PM »
Lane #1 is the bomb.
Logged

TyLytle

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 577
Re: WHO HAS THE BEST PRICES ON BALLS...
« Reply #17 on: July 31, 2003, 09:05:03 PM »
I have tried Lane 1......  No thanks.

Ty
Logged

srlunatic

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4316
Re: WHO HAS THE BEST PRICES ON BALLS...
« Reply #18 on: July 31, 2003, 09:08:02 PM »
I have tried Lane 1....

Ball rolled down lane.....hooked a bit...hit pins.....and left some sometimes and left none other times....didn't break pins apart...didn't leave skid marks on the lane....didn't cook me dinner or do my laundry....just did what bowling balls tend to do..........for almost a 100 bucks more than my most expensive piece of equipment.  

To me...not worth the added cost........but that is just me.....




--------------------
Hotter than Drugz...
Kooler than Jesus...
I am...
srlunatic....
Logged
They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.

tenpin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1681
Re: WHO HAS THE BEST PRICES ON BALLS...
« Reply #19 on: August 01, 2003, 08:32:16 AM »
I have tried lane 1 before and don't see what all the hype is in there equipment.  I would much rather have a hammer in my hands to be smashing the diamonds apart and save a little cash for the family.  Lame 1 just does not impress me.
Logged

A_P_K

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1835
Re: WHO HAS THE BEST PRICES ON BALLS...
« Reply #20 on: August 01, 2003, 08:44:41 AM »
Lane 1.......as everyone else said.........too much money, too much hype, not enough performance.  I USED to have an all Lane 1 arsenal and wathced my average drop 10-15 pins.  So I sold all the crap for as best as I could

I find that AZO and Visionary BREAK pins while all my old Lane 1 equipment struggled to carry the back row.  Those manufacturers bowling balls HIT so HARD that carry isn't even suspect.  

Many claim that 16# balls don't carry well because of their structure, I say go out and buy the right 16# ball.


--------------------
Pin_Krusher, formerly Divine Dragon.....a.k.a...The Littleboy with a neutron bomb

Drastically inflicting pin punishing destruction, and doing it with...................well a Drastic!!
Logged
<b>The original Pin Krusher</b>

rackattack

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 994
Re: WHO HAS THE BEST PRICES ON BALLS...
« Reply #21 on: August 01, 2003, 09:14:52 AM »
My list of great value balls,
Columbia:Wicked and Wow along with the Game series
Dynothane:Vendetta series
Roto-Grip:Silver Streak line
Storm:Eraser series
Brunswick:Monster line
Track:Hex line
Ebonite:Cat line
Visionary:Gryphon series
The bottom line is with the exception of Morich and Lane 1 a patient bowler can get the best of any manufacturer at reduced prices if they are willing to wait for the reincarnations that are sure to follow.

--------------------
If you can't join 'em beat 'em.
Logged

channel surfer

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2036
Re: WHO HAS THE BEST PRICES ON BALLS...
« Reply #22 on: August 01, 2003, 09:43:07 AM »
The guy that drills my balls(best in area)throws OLD reactive balls, and avg's 220 with them in every house.
--------------------
My Bowling Clinic Site: http://channelsurfers.vze.com

ASK A PRO:http://channelsurfers.vze.com/atp.shtml

Bowl.. Grab life by the balls.

Money is no object to me because I dont have any...
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]
« previous next »