win a ball from Bowling.com
« previous next »
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: Venom vs. BWP  (Read 996 times)

joebokie

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 61
Venom vs. BWP
« on: February 10, 2009, 01:19:25 AM »
Hey Hammer Lovers. I am thinking about getting a Venom and was wondering if I might have more success than I did with a BWP that I own. I was never sure what the breakpoint would be with the BWP. I see guys using the Venom and it seems to be a very aggressive piece. What should I expect in Venom vs. BWP.
--------------------
Please, just one more ball, surely it has a 900 in it.
Logged

 

bluerrpilot

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1235
Re: Venom vs. BWP
« Reply #1 on: February 10, 2009, 10:08:36 AM »
More roll less skid/snap from the Venom. Its still has a strong backend but its not as jerky. It will also handle oil better than the BWP
--------------------
"USBC is concerned that technology has overtaken player skill in determining success in the sport of bowling"
Logged

J_w73

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2554
Re: Venom vs. BWP
« Reply #2 on: February 10, 2009, 10:54:22 AM »
Take your BWP to 2000 abralon. That will take alot of over under out of it and make it a little less squirty on carrydown.
--------------------
16-17 mph
350 rpm
PAP 5 1/2 x 3/8 up
High Game 300 x 3
High Series 782
Book Average 215 / 205
PBA Xperience ave 180
years bowling 22
Logged
350 RPM, 17 MPH
Pages: [1]
« previous next »