Things can change quickly, you have a single game, and in a doubles tournament, you have 5 frames, or 5 shots basically if you bowl the one game. You can get faked out in practice, and just getting a bad hit doesn't mean instantly make a big adjustment. If you didn't see the adjustments Butturff made, then you weren't looking very closely, just because he stayed in the same area didn't mean he wasn't making adjustments, and especially on the left side you quite often have to figure out how to play the same zone or area a different way. We don't have all the free hook and midlane stability the right side has.
This happened to me in league last night, and it took 7 frames of me making adjustments and trying to figure it out before I had to move. Tried a few balls out in practice, last few shots found something solid, started with that ball. First frame was a hard wrap 7, that's not something to adjust on, 2nd frame was a strike, 3rd frame was another hard wrap 7, ok maybe we do something different on that lane next time. 4th frame was a flat 7, so maybe we're already seeing the lanes settle down, time to do something. Slowed my speed down in the 5th frame, looked better, strike. Did the same thing in the 6th frame, but got it in a little, ball takes off for a 2-4-7-8, great. 7 frame, went from a solid strike right to a weak 7-10, so I finally decided to get out of the ball.
So 9/, X, 9/, 9/, X, 63, X, 7-10 and nothing to show for 6 great shots and one marginal one because apparently I got faked out in practice. On tv, your day is done at that point, and in the context of the doubles tournament, I'd have left a couple wrap 7s and a flat 7 on 5 great shots during which I made an adjustment and been done because I either got a bad read in practice or transition started at the wrong time. Butters made at least two adjustments in those 5 frames, and just didn't get the hits, so I don't get the take on any of this at all.
Sometimes I don't like what I see. I"ve watched Belmo, Simonson, and now Maldanado, throw away a tournament by trying to use a urethane ball when it was obvious even to an amateur that was not the right ball to be trying to use. This week DJ Archer spent the whole game trying to find a ball when it was obvious he needed to down grade his ball a bunch, not one at a time.
According to the most recent Brad and Kyle vlog; Brad walks us into the area where the TV pair is located and it is completely separate (different part of the building) from the lanes where they did the qualifying and match play. By his own admission he states they play pretty different but it was urethane that got Maldo and Osku to the TV finals. But I was shocked to see him using a "weak" urethane on the longer of the two patterns. Conversely; Sterner used an Infamous on the same lane and his look was terrible as well.
My question....is where were the ball reps during warmups and what were they seeing that led to them picking the Black Hammer and Proton for Maldo and Archer? What was the ball rep seeing that led to the Infamous as the ball of choice for Sterner? As good as Kent's look was (and he had room); I am surprised nobody tried to play on top of his line. Butturff has gotten to a point he is too reliant on the Purple Hammer. His look was not very good and he did not adjust one single time. Even after the first two flat 7 pins; Specto still showed his ball going over the 12 board the entire game. Kent and Tackett won simply because they played to their strengths (Kent playing straighter and Tackett wheeling on it from 4th-5th arrow).