BallReviews
Equipment Boards => Hammer => Topic started by: jhicks hammer staff on June 06, 2009, 12:26:18 PM
-
threw this ball this morning and had 300 and 834 love this ball!!!it is a skid snappy ball but if u guys have any questions feel free to email me Jeff Hicks hammer staff
-
Is it true that the silver in this ball is the same as the particle in the chalk?
-
particle?
-
The word going around the bowling alley is that the silver in the burn is particle making it a longer version of the chalk. It sounded odd that hammer would do this to the raw line so that's why I asked.
-
seems like another toxic in deguise with new cover and core im talking about the way ive seen it react with seems like same lenght and same reaction to the pocket maybe im wrong?
--------------------
formerly known as absoluteinferno76
buddies pro shop best proshop in the industry! chris and the guys are spot on with customer service. the best deals on the net.
-
there is no particle in this cover! and as far as the pyscho the burn has more pop on the back so surfacing a pyscho wouldnt make it backend more it would make it earlier so to answer your question NO
-
the toxic was a great ball, it started a lot earlier than the burn and the psycho
they look to to hook the same amount just in different areas of the lane
toxic = earlier
psycho = midlane
burn = backend
i have a toxic and love that ball, the psycho didnt look much different from the toxic, just a little more back end, but the burn looks even later than than the psycho
--------------------
Nothing Hits Like A Roto Grip
In The Bag All 15s:
Roto Grip Rogue Cell
Global 900 Break S75
Roto Grip Grand Illusion
Raw Hammer Toxic
Roto Grip Neptune
WWF Rock Spare Ball
//www.bowlsk.com/view-profile.html