win a ball from Bowling.com
« previous next »
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: Question on old Hammers  (Read 3032 times)

dougb

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1551
Question on old Hammers
« on: February 20, 2010, 02:56:06 PM »
A few months ago I picked up a Faball Blue Hammer.  It is my favorite ball these days, and on the right conditions nothing can match it.  I don't know if it's the 2-piece construction, but it hits the pins so hard.

My question is on two of the older Hammers.  If I like the solid blue so much, how will the blue urethane Hammer compare?

And what about the Maxxx 3D Offset?  Was that also 2-piece construction?  Urethane or reactive? What core did it use?

Thanks
Logged

 

charlest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24526
Re: Question on old Hammers
« Reply #1 on: February 21, 2010, 06:50:02 AM »
WHen you said Faball Blue Hammer, I thought you were using the urethane Blue Hammer. It is "THE" Blue Hammer. Maybe others made the same mistake I did. So which "Blue Hammer" are you throwing?
--------------------
"None are so blind as those who will not see."
Logged
"None are so blind as those who will not see."

anotherwindup

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 740
Re: Question on old Hammers
« Reply #2 on: February 21, 2010, 07:28:44 AM »
Charlest - possibly the navy reactive hammer?  Man, if he likes that one...
--------------------
Jason Jenkins
Hammer Amateur Staff
"Nothing HITS like a Hammer"

http://www.hammerbowling.com/hammertalk/forumdisplay.php?f=2
Logged

scotts33

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8452
Re: Question on old Hammers
« Reply #3 on: February 21, 2010, 07:38:24 AM »
Might be that dougb is speaking of the Faball Blue Hammer 2001.  http://www.bowlingballmall.com/bowl/product.asp?dept_id=86&pf_id=752&mfgid=10&Shopper=DBEPLVCXECB58K2TW29SE4UDE8SSD6BA vs the orginal Blue Hammer urethane released in 93.




--------------------
Scott

Logged
Scott

Juggernaut

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6498
  • Former good bowler, now 3 games a week house hack.
Re: Question on old Hammers
« Reply #4 on: February 21, 2010, 08:34:51 AM »
quote:
Might be that dougb is speaking of the Faball Blue Hammer 2001.  http://www.bowlingballmall.com/bowl/product.asp?dept_id=86&pf_id=752&mfgid=10&Shopper=DBEPLVCXECB58K2TW29SE4UDE8SSD6BA vs the orginal Blue Hammer urethane released in 93.




--------------------
Scott



 Or, perhaps he speaks of the BIG BLUE Hammer?
--------------------
Good transactions list in my profile

 ILLEGITIMI, NON-CARBORUNDUM!
Logged
Learn to laugh, and love, and smile, cause we’re only here for a little while.

scotts33

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8452
Re: Question on old Hammers
« Reply #5 on: February 21, 2010, 08:44:24 AM »
quote:
   quote:Might be that dougb is speaking of the Faball Blue Hammer 2001. http://www.bowlingballmall.com/bowl/product.asp?dept_id=86&pf_id=752&mfgid=10&Shopper=DBEPLVCXECB58K2TW29SE4UDE8SSD6BA  vs the orginal Blue Hammer urethane released in 93.


    --------------------
    Scott

Or, perhaps he speaks of the BIG BLUE Hammer?


Yep that could be BUT dougb said in his original post A few months ago I picked up a Faball Blue Hammer. that would mean Ebonite produced not Faball manufactured.
--------------------
Scott

Logged
Scott

dougb

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1551
Re: Question on old Hammers
« Reply #6 on: February 21, 2010, 09:04:31 AM »
Sorry for the confusion.  I'm using a Utah-produced original Fabll Blue Hammer urethane ball.
Logged

scotts33

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8452
Re: Question on old Hammers
« Reply #7 on: February 21, 2010, 09:12:28 AM »
dougb,

I guess we are confused as to your original post asking comparison to "My question is on two of the older Hammers. If I like the solid blue so much, how will the blue urethane Hammer compare?"

Can you state what you are wanting to compare the original Faball Blue Hammer to?
--------------------
Scott

Logged
Scott

raiderh20boy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1735
Re: Question on old Hammers
« Reply #8 on: February 21, 2010, 09:40:47 AM »
Blue pearl???
--------------------
Use "IT" and BOWL UP A STORM!!
Logged

Juggernaut

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6498
  • Former good bowler, now 3 games a week house hack.
Re: Question on old Hammers
« Reply #9 on: February 21, 2010, 01:34:47 PM »
quote:
Blue pearl???
--------------------
Use "IT" and BOWL UP A STORM!!


 That's what I was thinking as well, after his reply.
--------------------
Good transactions list in my profile

 ILLEGITIMI, NON-CARBORUNDUM!
Logged
Learn to laugh, and love, and smile, cause we’re only here for a little while.

dougb

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1551
Re: Question on old Hammers
« Reply #10 on: February 21, 2010, 05:36:55 PM »
quote:
dougb,

I guess we are confused as to your original post asking comparison to "My question is on two of the older Hammers. If I like the solid blue so much, how will the blue urethane Hammer compare?"

Can you state what you are wanting to compare the original Faball Blue Hammer to?
--------------------
Scott



Thanks for your patience, guys.  My Blue Hammer is hands down my favorite ball.  It''s drilled 1 o''clock label. The ball goes long and while it doesn''t move too much on the backend it hits HARD.  I don''t know if it''s the solid shell or what but it drives harder through the pins than any of my new equipment.  I can use it on pretty much anything except heavy oil and dry lanes.

I''m assuming the Blue Pearl (http://www.bowlingball.com/hammer-faball-1980-blue-pearl-hammer-by-faball-bowling-ball.html) will go longer and be better for light oil, but retain that same gentle arc.

As for the Maxx 3D Offset, I know nothing about these balls and would like to know more about the core and the cover (reactive?  2 or 3-piece construction?).  I''m thinking this ball could cover heavy oil, building a complete arsenal around older Faball equipment!

Hope this helps, and thanks.



Edited on 2/21/2010 9:53 PM
Logged
Pages: [1]
« previous next »