win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: Summary: Bite vs original Widow  (Read 1889 times)

pjr300

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1487
  • Live from the Bowling Capital of the World!
Summary: Bite vs original Widow
« on: January 16, 2008, 02:02:04 PM »

Last week I purchased a new Black Widow Bite. My first two experiences (Friday league, Saturday tourney) with the ball were less than optimal; the ball was too much for the condition. However, when I went to my Black Widow Pearl, the ball skated and my reaction was too weak.

When purchasing the Bite, I had talked myself out of purchasing another original BW. I was worried that the gap between the Pearl and the Bite would be too large... but I "bit" anyhow with the new model. Well, my concern was exactly right. It really killed me in the tournament; I had a great shot for the BW, but spent all day fighting with the Bite by lack of choice of having anything else to use.

I did use the Bite again Sunday in a fundraiser. Had a great shot with the Bite for one game; the oil breaks down quickly in this wood house, and again, too big a gap to use the Pearl (tried a few shots -- bucket city).

So, yesterday I picked up another original BW. I've worn out two in the last year, and had been somewhat hesitating on buying the 3rd, but pulled the string out of desperation.

Tonite I bowled in one of my leagues; the shot is usually drier due to following a four person league. However, tonight the oil was much more robust; we believe that the early league bowled a blind score.

I was able to use the Bite for most of the first two games. The ball really carries well and has a strong backend reaction. The hit is superb. The midlane read is great as well.

Late in the second game two consequetive shots jumped, leaving a 4-9 followed by a 3-6-10. Time to change! I switched to the original for the 10th, keeping close to the same line. I was able to strike out with three flush shots. The ball was able to get doen the lane further in the transitioning condition (about 5 feet) before starting to read, and the back end was strong, but not as pronounced....say 5 or 6 boards.

I didn't get a chance to throw the Pearl. My guess, based upon past use, is that once the BW began to over-react or ring 10 pins, I would stay in the same spot and bring out the Pearl. The ball gets even further down the lane, but its back end reaction is larger.

By the way, the layout on all three balls is very similar.

I think these three balls will give me a very complete arsonal that I can use 98% of the time, and make ball changes with speed and confidence.  Thank you Hammer!


--------------------
pjr300
live from the Bowling Capital of the World

Team Hammer

specs and transaction record (positive and negative) in my profile
pjr300
Specs and Transaction history in my profile...

 

Jock

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 423
Re: Summary: Bite vs original Widow
« Reply #1 on: January 17, 2008, 06:37:27 AM »
"Too big a gap to use the pearl (tried a few shots - bucket city)"

So when you're in "bucket city", the reflex nowadays is to change balls?

I must be too "Old School" because when I'm in bucket city my reflex is to adjust my feet and target????

Besides, living in Europe makes it too expensive to have a ball for each "city" that we visit!
--------------------
I've upped my average, so up yours!
Ive upped my average, so up yours!

pjr300

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1487
  • Live from the Bowling Capital of the World!
Re: Summary: Bite vs original Widow
« Reply #2 on: January 17, 2008, 07:24:02 AM »
quote:
My opinion is the Black Widow series is seemingly designed to complement each other.  The Bite is absurdly strong, the Solid is less, but by no means tame, and the Pearl is the "tame" (take that with a grain of salt). The best example is my current arsenal, which can (now) be seen in my profile.
--------------------
When the hell is BR.com going to add some real, online sometimes Moderators.  This place needs some cleaning up.  



CZ, I don't know if they were designed to complement, but it sure came out that way!  Your descriptions are right on, although I would call the Pearl "long" rather than "tame." Its backend is just sick.


--------------------
pjr300
live from the Bowling Capital of the World

Team Hammer

specs and transaction record (positive and negative) in my profile
pjr300
Specs and Transaction history in my profile...

pjr300

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1487
  • Live from the Bowling Capital of the World!
Re: Summary: Bite vs original Widow
« Reply #3 on: January 17, 2008, 07:31:32 AM »
quote:
"Too big a gap to use the pearl (tried a few shots - bucket city)"

So when you're in "bucket city", the reflex nowadays is to change balls?

I must be too "Old School" because when I'm in bucket city my reflex is to adjust my feet and target????

Besides, living in Europe makes it too expensive to have a ball for each "city" that we visit!
--------------------
I've upped my average, so up yours!


Oh, I moved too.  Don't worry, I'm 'old school' as well.  There was so much carrydown.... In the first game I was deep with the Pearl. By game 3 I had moved right, reduced speed, AND tightened the line (less belly) and still the Pearl skated on the carrydown. Needed a solid... but the Bite was too much. As CZ states, it is "absurdly strong."

This center transitions quickly and drastically based upon the way they lay down the house pattern. Sometimes the adjustments aren't enough, and you have to change gear.... sometimes that's the reality of bowling here in the ol' US of A.




--------------------
pjr300
live from the Bowling Capital of the World

Team Hammer

specs and transaction record (positive and negative) in my profile
pjr300
Specs and Transaction history in my profile...

crankncrash

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 967
Re: Summary: Bite vs original Widow
« Reply #4 on: January 17, 2008, 09:41:13 AM »
On a similar note, do you find the widow pearl to be a bit "over-under-y?"  I have younger bowler that I am working with a little bit and it seems that he has a nice shot the first and most of the second game, but after that its too strong to go up the boards and gets erratic inside. I ended up grabbing him a Blue Vibe that we are going to drill slightly weaker and give him a more consistant reaction.  But I am wondering what others actually think of this ball.

pjr300

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1487
  • Live from the Bowling Capital of the World!
Re: Summary: Bite vs original Widow
« Reply #5 on: January 17, 2008, 10:44:05 AM »
quote:
On a similar note, do you find the widow pearl to be a bit "over-under-y?"  I have younger bowler that I am working with a little bit and it seems that he has a nice shot the first and most of the second game, but after that its too strong to go up the boards and gets erratic inside. I ended up grabbing him a Blue Vibe that we are going to drill slightly weaker and give him a more consistant reaction.  But I am wondering what others actually think of this ball.


I have the same problem with one of my high school bowlers. If you don't havea lot of ball speed, this ball can get very eratic (as will any strong pearl) in such a condition. We solved the problem by taking down the polish with a 4000 grit Abralon pad... that smoothed out the response.


--------------------
pjr300
live from the Bowling Capital of the World

Team Hammer

specs and transaction record (positive and negative) in my profile
pjr300
Specs and Transaction history in my profile...

crankncrash

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 967
Re: Summary: Bite vs original Widow
« Reply #6 on: January 17, 2008, 02:10:55 PM »
ahh, that might have been a good thought, I don't know if I can ever get it through to these kids that its cooler to throw high scores than have the ball that has the coolest look on the lane... I think smoothing the cover would be great, but I don't think he would, so I compromised and got him into a solid ball... now to see if I can get him to throw it in the right part of the lane... suggestions on giving pointers to a 14yr old pro?