BallReviews

Equipment Boards => Hammer => Topic started by: bowl4jc on September 04, 2007, 09:59:10 AM

Title: Toxic vs Doom
Post by: bowl4jc on September 04, 2007, 09:59:10 AM

Which ball is better for medium to med heavy...Looking for a good ball with a good solid reaction.  Let me know what you guys suggest between these two balls.

Thanks

Title: Re: Toxic vs Doom
Post by: dumbcomputers on September 04, 2007, 06:10:40 PM

I think the Anger would be a better choice then either of them.

Title: Re: Toxic vs Doom
Post by: bluerrpilot on September 04, 2007, 06:12:52 PM

Between those 2....Doom all the way.
--------------------
TEAM HammerHead
2008 USBC Nationals
ABQ, NM

Edited on 9/4/2007 6:13 PM

Title: Re: Toxic vs Doom
Post by: NJStroker on September 04, 2007, 06:16:49 PM

Out of those 2, the toxic would be better. Get an anger though its better and the same price.

Title: Re: Toxic vs Doom
Post by: azguy on September 04, 2007, 06:19:53 PM

Between the Toxic and Doom....Toxic. But, the Anger will take more oil, just not as big a backend as the Toxic.
--------------------
az guy aka: R & L Bowlers Pro
rlbowlerspro@cox.net
www.rlbowlerspro.com

Title: Re: Toxic vs Doom
Post by: Nicanor on September 04, 2007, 07:47:05 PM

Wow, now that's confusing..  Toxic-Doom if those are the choices for medium heavy and you can get either of these at a very good price, then take your pick.  But if you're buying it new, Buddies' Pro shop has the Anger new for $104 shipped and that is the better of the three IMHO.


--------------------
Nicanor (Ten On The Deck)

Title: Re: Toxic vs Doom
Post by: NJStroker on September 04, 2007, 08:10:26 PM

Well, the doom is for medium-light. The Toxic is a very very aggressive ball, and u could take the polish off and it could work too.

Title: Re: Toxic vs Doom
Post by: slap on September 05, 2007, 07:27:08 AM

the Toxic is very aggresive at a dull finish. Check out the review on the BJI website.
--------------------
"Student of the Game"

http://s9.photobucket.com/albums/a63/slap1914/bowling/

Title: Re: Toxic vs Doom
Post by: fooitzrobbie on September 07, 2007, 05:14:23 PM

TOXIC TOXIC TOXIC.

Title: Re: Toxic vs Doom
Post by: bluerrpilot on September 07, 2007, 06:10:14 PM

With so many people thinking the Toxic is so great, how come I cant unload mine.
--------------------
TEAM HammerHead
2008 USBC Nationals
ABQ, NM

Title: Re: Toxic vs Doom
Post by: ccrider on September 07, 2007, 08:46:13 PM

Quote

With so many people thinking the Toxic is so great, how come I cant unload mine.
--------------------
TEAM HammerHead
2008 USBC Nationals
ABQ, NM [/quote


Eveyone has one.  I will take it if you can't unload it anywhere else.

Title: Re: Toxic vs Doom
Post by: keeones23 on September 08, 2007, 11:27:39 AM

I agree with rider. Everyone who thinks it's great already has one
--------------------



http://www.putfile.com/keeones

Title: Re: Toxic vs Doom
Post by: Fatboy8 on September 08, 2007, 12:50:23 PM

Out of those two balls, I'd say the Toxic. Mine was drilled Rico, and it was really strong. Both balls could handle a good amout, just with a surface tweak.

The Anger however is a real winner right now with Hammer's lineup. You can't go wrong with any of their stuff right now.
--------------------
Hammer-Lane #1