win a ball from Bowling.com
« previous next »
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: Was the Toxic considered to be a pearlized coverstock?  (Read 1864 times)

charlest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24526
Was the Toxic considered to be a pearlized coverstock?
« on: June 30, 2010, 11:35:39 AM »
Thamks.
--------------------
"None are so blind as those who will not see."
Logged
"None are so blind as those who will not see."

 

Spartan

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 475
Re: Was the Toxic considered to be a pearlized coverstock?
« Reply #1 on: June 30, 2010, 07:42:33 PM »
Yes, it was. I owned one, and it definitely looked and reacted like a pearl.
--------------------
Formerly Chocolate Milk.
Logged

slap

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 728
Re: Was the Toxic considered to be a pearlized coverstock?
« Reply #2 on: June 30, 2010, 09:26:21 PM »
If I remember correctly, the cover stock was a pearl with an aggressive traction additive. It handled a fair about of oil with some surface.
--------------------
"Student of the Game"

http://s9.photobucket.com/albums/a63/slap1914/bowling/
Logged

charlest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24526
Re: Was the Toxic considered to be a pearlized coverstock?
« Reply #3 on: June 30, 2010, 09:43:58 PM »
Thanks, guys. I thought so. Never even saw one, so I was wondering.

Slap,

I saw the description here on BR. It said "Traction Pearl additive". Wasn't 100% positive. Thanks.
--------------------
"None are so blind as those who will not see."
Logged
"None are so blind as those who will not see."

slap

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 728
Re: Was the Toxic considered to be a pearlized coverstock?
« Reply #4 on: June 30, 2010, 10:13:06 PM »
No worries. I read that other thread, that guy was incorrect.

My toxic became my main test subject when I purchased my spinner. I became very familiar with the cover.

It's amusing how the term "additive" has become a buzzword.
--------------------
"Student of the Game"

http://s9.photobucket.com/albums/a63/slap1914/bowling/
Logged

charlest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24526
Re: Was the Toxic considered to be a pearlized coverstock?
« Reply #5 on: July 01, 2010, 05:56:21 AM »
Most times, pearlization is effected by adding mica to the coverstock. Small sized mice makes it a pearl, yet larger sized mica (2nd Dimension, Prodigy and several older Storm balls) can be added as particles to add friction, to the coverstock. So "Traction Pearl" can be a sort of a double entendre.

--------------------
"None are so blind as those who will not see."
Logged
"None are so blind as those who will not see."

Juggernaut

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6498
  • Former good bowler, now 3 games a week house hack.
Re: Was the Toxic considered to be a pearlized coverstock?
« Reply #6 on: July 03, 2010, 07:02:37 PM »
quote:
Most times, pearlization is effected by adding mica to the coverstock. Small sized mice makes it a pearl, yet larger sized mica (2nd Dimension, Prodigy and several older Storm balls) can be added as particles to add friction, to the coverstock. So "Traction Pearl" can be a sort of a double entendre.

--------------------
"None are so blind as those who will not see."


 Man, do I feel bad for THOSE mice.
--------------------
Good transactions list in my profile

Logged
Learn to laugh, and love, and smile, cause we’re only here for a little while.
Pages: [1]
« previous next »