Author Topic: Agent Orange compared to Dynamo (Read 12921 times)

dougb · « **on:** April 15, 2009, 03:16:39 AM »

Anybody thrown both of these balls? I'm curious how they compare.

Thanks

triggerman · « **Reply #46 on:** April 16, 2009, 06:46:46 PM »

its threads like this one that keeps posters like myself from coming around period

if the OP wants an honest opinion of the two balls he asked about i would be more then happy to tell you what i think of them, as compared to other balls i have seen
i personally have both in the bag and throw both on a regular basis
--------------------
www.bowlingballexchange.com

Triggerman

F.O.S Loud, F.O.S. Proud

Lane #1 Baby

Steven · « **Reply #47 on:** April 16, 2009, 07:03:03 PM »

quote:
Here is another example of how you love to come on and bash people who don't see your point of view. There is really no point in trying to be nice or civil with you. Cause when we do that, you sink to you usually low level and attack.

jls: LOL, cut the BS. You're on record as being here just to liven things up and bring 'free' attention to the Lane#1 forum. That's fine (well, not really), but don't try to pretend you're here to do anything other than stir up trouble. As a proshop operator who should be representing the sport, you can provide more value than endlessly bashing a marketing only 'Ball of the Year" statement. Really, give it a rest.

Man up and provide some valid input on the Dynamo vs. the AO. If you haven't seen both in action, you're spending too much time watching reruns of Raymond and not enough time keeping up to speed on products you should be familiar with. Do this, and you have my apologies for labeling you a hopeless unredeemable troll.

Brickguy221 · « **Reply #48 on:** April 17, 2009, 12:57:10 AM »

quote:
its threads like this one that keeps posters like myself from coming around period

if the OP wants an honest opinion of the two balls he asked about i would be more then happy to tell you what i think of them, as compared to other balls i have seen
i personally have both in the bag and throw both on a regular basis
--------------------
www.bowlingballexchange.com

Triggerman

F.O.S Loud, F.O.S. Proud

Lane #1 Baby

+1 I'm with Triggerman here. This is exactly the reason I quit posting and seldom even come on Ball Reviews to read and post anymore.
--------------------
"Whenever I feel the urge to exercise I lie down until the feeling passes away."

Brick

bowlerdawg · « **Reply #49 on:** April 17, 2009, 07:29:54 AM »

+2 triggie
me too

--------------------
I'm your huckleberry

Jeffrevs · « **Reply #50 on:** April 17, 2009, 08:13:31 AM »

quote:
its threads like this one that keeps posters like myself from coming around period

if the OP wants an honest opinion of the two balls he asked about i would be more then happy to tell you what i think of them, as compared to other balls i have seen
i personally have both in the bag and throw both on a regular basis
--------------------
www.bowlingballexchange.com

Triggerman

F.O.S Loud, F.O.S. Proud

Lane #1 Baby

+100 !!! I'm the 101st (I think) response to a question, simple question asked about comparing 2 balls. And ....in typical fashion 4 to 6 people are making it their own troll-fest that's become, well....asinine
--------------------
Jeff
The Revless Wonder and King Douchebag!

Deathclutch · « **Reply #51 on:** April 17, 2009, 08:17:27 AM »

quote:
quote:
its threads like this one that keeps posters like myself from coming around period

if the OP wants an honest opinion of the two balls he asked about i would be more then happy to tell you what i think of them, as compared to other balls i have seen
i personally have both in the bag and throw both on a regular basis
--------------------
www.bowlingballexchange.com

Triggerman

F.O.S Loud, F.O.S. Proud

Lane #1 Baby

+100 !!! I'm the 101st (I think) response to a question, simple question asked about comparing 2 balls. And ....in typical fashion 4 to 6 people are making it their own troll-fest that's become, well....asinine
--------------------
Jeff
The Revless Wonder and King Douchebag!

Ditto!
--------------------
F.O.S.

goose194 · « **Reply #52 on:** April 17, 2009, 08:24:15 AM »

Same here Trigg.

dougb, you want a serious responce, go to bowlingballexchange.com and ask.

Edited on 4/17/2009 8:49 AM

triggerman · « **Reply #53 on:** April 17, 2009, 08:44:08 AM »

quote:
Anybody thrown both of these balls? I'm curious how they compare.

Thanks

Doug
I have these two balls, similar pins and tops, both drilled very very similar, surfaces very similar

by similar I mean
AO is drilled 45* x 4.5 pin to pap x 40
Dynamo is drilled 55* x 4.5 pin to pap x 45

this resulted in a cg out on the AO (maybe out 1")
dyanmo a true stack
both do not have balance holes

AO surface is 4k abralon no polish
Dynamo is 4k abralon with polish

strengths

AO is very strong in the mids, with the 4k goes about 2 feet longer then the dynamo, it does react hard but not as hard as the dynamo to the dry with the 4k gets thru the heads easily

Dynamo is very strong off the dry, but loves the oil line, i can play deeper inside with the dynamo vs the AO AO doenst seem to have the 5th arrow recovery unlessw the lanes are used up

with the dynamo I usually use it first out, left foot on 35 targeting 15 at the arrows, to about the 6 at the break, ball makes it easily, (AO is a little weak at this line on our fresh semi heavy league shot)if I get the dynamo outside the 6 at the break it is way to hard on the turn, and will leave nasty nasty leaves I can typically use the dynamo for 1.5 games without moving, and instead of moving I go to the AO and play the same line, what i get is a cleaner move thru the heads with a very good turn.

In closing I can interchange these two balls, and use them exclusively for the entire set. on a little lighter oil i go AO on heavier I go dynamo If you wanted just one, I dont think I could pick. I love the dynamo, but teammate who has both chooses AO they have different hits, and different carry strengths

for house shots, i think the AO may be better, but I like the dyanmo roll better for my game

my vote, Dynamo
teammate AO

we both average 210+ on this league shot

on edit
my dynamo is stronger then virtual gravity, slightly longer as well, it also is stronger then rogue (pot bowling against league members, have proben this to me many nights over
other teammate throws a cell and a playmaker and the AO kills him all the time, so mch so he bought one and loves it
--------------------
www.bowlingballexchange.com

Triggerman

F.O.S Loud, F.O.S. Proud

Lane #1 Baby

Edited on 4/17/2009 8:47 AM

bowlerdawg · « **Reply #54 on:** April 17, 2009, 09:02:45 AM »

ty triggie for bringing sanity to an insane post, and answering the op's question.

I have no hands on w/ the AO otherwise I would have posted my side by side also.
--------------------
I'm your huckleberry

jls · « **Reply #55 on:** April 17, 2009, 11:10:38 AM »

Steven and friends, it's only a serious question when one of the groupies ask a question. When other's ask, all hell breaks out.

That Steven is exactly what happened to Oddballs. He darned to ask why the Dynamo was being called the ball of the year. he got a rude crude reply.

They I pointed out that Oddballs simply asked a question, and got a rude crude reply. And guess what, then I got you Steven.....

Now all you little make believe wan a bees can say whatever you want. It's all there in that original thread....

You groupies come on and try to act so important, but your not... You try to act like you're Lane One's best customers!!!!

Yet most of you buy their balls on ebay, used!!!!!!

Bottom line here is simple, you groupies show zero respect for anyone who post on this site that is not a groupie....

Then people like Steven list their names and bashes them in his cute little boring post....

And if they respond to your bashing, you cry like little geek babies.

And then you have the nerve, the gall, more crust then a pie factory to say, "we asked a serious questopn, and want a serious answer"

But if anyone else asks a serious question, like who in their right mind declared this ball, the "ball of the year" why that's not a serious question???

Steven, you are a total boring little geek groupie wan a bee, who likes to come on and play, Joe Pro Bowler Pro shop....

Now groupies, go back and read the original thread on the Dynamo, and you will plainly see that all Oddballs did was ask a question. And I followed up on it. And the blasted by the groupies began.....

And when we respond, you cry like babies....

now

are we clear

Steven, all of your future replies to me will be filed, in the gaebage...

still clear

BTW Steven, If the day comes where I ever see a bowler using either the A.O. or the Dynamo, I will stop watching Raymond!!!!!

But you see Steven, I come from a small town of about 9 million people....
And I have never ever seen a single bowler using an A. O. or the Dynamo.

See zillions of Virtual's, Rogue, Bites, Cells, but still have not seen one bowler with the A.O. or the Dynamo.....

"A zillion, that's a lot"

So Steven, since I have plenty of reads on those balls, I'll continue to watch Raymond....

And you and your friends, why feel free to come on and act important...
--------------------
jls

Edited on 4/17/2009 11:15 AM

absoluteisanidiot · « **Reply #56 on:** April 17, 2009, 11:28:10 AM »

BORING,USELESS,DRIBBLE GARBAGE FROM OUR FRIEND JLS. YOUR THE BEST AND QUITE SPECIAL.

Steven · « **Reply #57 on:** April 17, 2009, 11:32:45 AM »

quote:
But if anyone else asks a serious question, like who in their right mind declared this ball, the "ball of the year" why that's not a serious question???

jls: You've asked the "ball of the year" question a million times. Very early in your endless search for the 'truth', I politely responded that the answer is to call Lane#1 and ask them yourself. That's the only way you'd get a straight answer, because it's their statement. But as always, you went off on one of your menopausal moments and refused. Why? because you're not really interested in the truth. You just want an endless soapbox to bash Lane#1 and the people who enjoy throwing the product.

The question was never serious. Please, stop the charade.

quote:
Steven, you are a total boring little geek groupie wan a bee, who likes to come on and play, Joe Pro Bowler Pro shop....

Well jls, if you didn't come on to play irresponsible troll instead of responsible proshop operator, maybe I wouldn't have to fill the 'valid input' gap for you. In the sister thread, I gave a response to the AO vs. Dynamo question. But you still insist your time is more valuable watching Raymond reruns than understanding the products available to your customers. I guess I'm taking valuable time away from Raymond and your other soaps. Please feel fee to go back to 'work'.

jls · « **Reply #58 on:** April 17, 2009, 11:38:06 AM »

quote:
quote:
But if anyone else asks a serious question, like who in their right mind declared this ball, the "ball of the year" why that's not a serious question???

jls: You've asked the "ball of the year" question a million times. Very early in your endless search for the 'truth', I politely responded that the answer is to call Lane#1 and ask them yourself. That's the only way you'd get a straight answer, because it's their statement. But as always, you went off on one of your menopausal moments and refused. Why? because you're not really interested in the truth. You just want an endless soapbox to bash Lane#1 and the people who enjoy throwing the product.

The question was never serious. Please, stop the charade.

quote:
Steven, you are a total boring little geek groupie wan a bee, who likes to come on and play, Joe Pro Bowler Pro shop....

Well jls, if you didn't come on to play irresponsible troll instead of responsible proshop operator, maybe I wouldn't have to fill the 'valid input' gap for you. In the sister thread, I gave a response to the AO vs. Dynamo question. But you still insist your time is more valuable watching Raymond reruns than understanding the products available to your customers. I guess I'm taking valuable time away from Raymond and your other soaps. Please feel fee to go back to 'work'.

Steven, may I call you, well anyway.

"Cause they said so" is not a valid answer.
nor is, "The F.O.S. thinks so" a valid answer.

BTM magazine said so...... that would be a valid answer.

NOW your reply will be file in the appropriate place. The garbage.

clear
--------------------
jls

Jeffrevs · « **Reply #59 on:** April 17, 2009, 12:03:33 PM »

quote:
quote:
quote:
its threads like this one that keeps posters like myself from coming around period

if the OP wants an honest opinion of the two balls he asked about i would be more then happy to tell you what i think of them, as compared to other balls i have seen
i personally have both in the bag and throw both on a regular basis
--------------------
www.bowlingballexchange.com

+100 !!! I'm the 101st (I think) response to a question, simple question asked about comparing 2 balls. And ....in typical fashion 4 to 6 people are making it their own troll-fest that's become, well....asinine
--------------------
Jeff
The Revless Wonder and King Douchebag!

You know what the great part about your answer is? The fact that you state there are 4 to 6 people making it a troll fest. Yet you fail to realize that there are 15-20 others that make sure they point out those 4-6... hmmm pot --> kettle.. well you get the idea there, not to mention another 5-8 just quoting the post and simply adding in "ditto" or "+1" Yet in the end you people blame myself, idk, Harry, jls for trolling??

Maybe because those 15-20 are sick and tired of these 4-6 ?!?!?! Huh??

Not that I have to answer to you , you little squirming $$h!t, but ....
I saw a simple question post (which I usually read, regardless of what forum it is) and I noticed 80+ answers...hmmm...must be pretty interesting, right, so I read it....and of course, ...it's as troll fest. And ...it's a shame that someone who wants an answer has his thread turned into this. It's the crap that brings this site down, AND...may I add, ...ALWAYS HAS!! So if I'd like to "comment" and you want to think it's a "troll comment" ,...sobeit ...but in the mean time, ...buzz off!

Public forum, moron. I'm not bashing his question or making his thread go off course, I actually commented on someone who brought the whole thing to attention.

Now, whoever you are, ...go away
--------------------
Jeff
The Revless Wonder and King Douchebag!

Edited on 4/17/2009 12:07 PM

jls · « **Reply #60 on:** April 17, 2009, 12:14:51 PM »

quote:
quote:
quote:
quote:
its threads like this one that keeps posters like myself from coming around period

if the OP wants an honest opinion of the two balls he asked about i would be more then happy to tell you what i think of them, as compared to other balls i have seen
i personally have both in the bag and throw both on a regular basis
--------------------
www.bowlingballexchange.com

+100 !!! I'm the 101st (I think) response to a question, simple question asked about comparing 2 balls. And ....in typical fashion 4 to 6 people are making it their own troll-fest that's become, well....asinine
--------------------
Jeff
The Revless Wonder and King Douchebag!

You know what the great part about your answer is? The fact that you state there are 4 to 6 people making it a troll fest. Yet you fail to realize that there are 15-20 others that make sure they point out those 4-6... hmmm pot --> kettle.. well you get the idea there, not to mention another 5-8 just quoting the post and simply adding in "ditto" or "+1" Yet in the end you people blame myself, idk, Harry, jls for trolling??

Maybe because those 15-20 are sick and tired of these 4-6 ?!?!?! Huh??

Not that I have to answer to you , you little squirming $$h!t, but ....
I saw a simple question post (which I usually read, regardless of what forum it is) and I noticed 80+ answers...hmmm...must be pretty interesting, right, so I read it....and of course, ...it's as troll fest. And ...it's a shame that someone who wants an answer has his thread turned into this. It's the crap that brings this site down, AND...may I add, ...ALWAYS HAS!! So if I'd like to "comment" and you want to think it's a "troll comment" ,...sobeit ...but in the mean time, ...buzz off!

Public forum, moron. I'm not bashing his question or making his thread go off course, I actually commented on someone who brought the whole thing to attention.

Now, whoever you are, ...go away
--------------------
Jeff
The Revless Wonder and King Douchebag!

Edited on 4/17/2009 12:07 PM

Jeff, Your replied is acknowledged!!!!

And now it will be filed, in the garbage.

Now why don't you go back to misc. non bowling related and continue on with your lastest post. "one liners"

Oh and BTW, maybe the moderater will notice your reply... He has asked that the post remain civil.... Squirming What?

?

Now another example of how you groupies go off on people....
Yet when the people you go off on reply, you report them!!!!!

What is a Squirming SXXXXXT?

You see Jeff, all some of us are doing is posting our side. And when we do, 10-15 of you groupies come on and fuel the fire... And then, cry!!!

clear
--------------------
jls

Author Topic: Agent Orange compared to Dynamo (Read 12921 times)

dougb

Agent Orange compared to Dynamo

triggerman

Re: Agent Orange compared to Dynamo

Steven

Re: Agent Orange compared to Dynamo

Brickguy221

Re: Agent Orange compared to Dynamo

bowlerdawg

Re: Agent Orange compared to Dynamo

Jeffrevs

Re: Agent Orange compared to Dynamo

Deathclutch

Re: Agent Orange compared to Dynamo

goose194

Re: Agent Orange compared to Dynamo

triggerman

Re: Agent Orange compared to Dynamo

bowlerdawg

Re: Agent Orange compared to Dynamo

jls

Re: Agent Orange compared to Dynamo

absoluteisanidiot

Re: Agent Orange compared to Dynamo

Steven

Re: Agent Orange compared to Dynamo

jls

Re: Agent Orange compared to Dynamo

Jeffrevs

Re: Agent Orange compared to Dynamo

jls

Re: Agent Orange compared to Dynamo