BallReviews

Equipment Boards => Lane #1 => Topic started by: dougb on April 15, 2009, 03:16:39 AM

Title: Agent Orange compared to Dynamo
Post by: dougb on April 15, 2009, 03:16:39 AM
Anybody thrown both of these balls?  I'm curious how they compare.

Thanks
Title: Re: Agent Orange compared to Dynamo
Post by: Steven on April 15, 2009, 11:56:38 AM
An honest question is asked, an the troll feast starts like clock work.

Amazing.
Title: Re: Agent Orange compared to Dynamo
Post by: absoluteisanidiot on April 15, 2009, 12:18:44 PM
Don't blame jls Steven it's like have tourette syndrome he just can't help it.  I've already gone over the day in the life of jls before.   One hand on the keyboard and one on the mouse waiting to reply to every question in the Lane#1 forums with the utmost professionalism.    Thanks jls for being there for someone that needed an honest and professional answer.
Title: Re: Agent Orange compared to Dynamo
Post by: jls on April 15, 2009, 02:02:43 PM
quote:
Don't blame jls Steven it's like have tourette syndrome he just can't help it.  I've already gone over the day in the life of jls before.   One hand on the keyboard and one on the mouse waiting to reply to every question in the Lane#1 forums with the utmost professionalism.    Thanks jls for being there for someone that needed an honest and professional answer.





Steve and ab so nothing.....

Get a life,  without me and CRD, this site is boring...  No one even bothers to bring up the Dynamo, the so called ball of the year....

For all you two know,  I'm probably being paid, or should be paid by Lane One,  Cause without me, no one knows or cares about the dynamo...  Just look at the last 15-25 days.....  Boring.

So ab so lute nobody...  get off your f-ing horse,  it was a joke you total loser,  just like you are, a joke and a wan a bee.

You sawheads take everything so personal,  bunch of up tight you know whats.

now be gone

btw,  fire away all you want dork boy,  to punish you,  I will not respond and once again the Dynamo will fade away!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

thanks to you, you little geek sawhead.

now

are we clear
--------------------
jls

Edited on 4/15/2009 2:03 PM
Title: Re: Agent Orange compared to Dynamo
Post by: jls on April 15, 2009, 02:21:10 PM
quote:
quote:
An honest question is asked, an the troll feast starts like clock work.

Amazing.


He could have clicked on one of the 17 other links talking about both of these balls, yet made a seperate post almost invited critism.  Trolling I think not... Pointing out idiocy in a sarcastic manner very much so.  And nice job trolling yourself Steven, called us out but couldn't answer the question being the Lane#1 cult member that you are.



Wow,  I think Frankie just pointed out that Steven and Ab so lute nobody, did not or can not address the topic of this thread.  But can attack others.  

I could not help but notice,  no new post on the Dynamo since 4-3-09!!!!!

So I thought I would take the time to help get some interest going again on this ball before it fades off the planet!!!!

And what do i get for my hard work....

Grief from some loser named Ab so lute nobody.  

Now I'm hurt...




--------------------
jls

Edited on 4/15/2009 2:24 PM
Title: Re: Agent Orange compared to Dynamo
Post by: taylorj99 on April 15, 2009, 02:25:57 PM
The initial question still has not been answered.

I personally have not thrown the AO, but one of my teammates does and I have the Dynamo. From my observations, the Dynamo will handle more oil, but the AO will remain in play longer. My Dynamo is OOB and his AO is lightly polished with the "sauce". HTH.

I'm not sure why a simple questioned just can't be answered. Instead, it's a pissing match every time someone asks a question. It's frustrating to say the least.

Edited on 4/15/2009 2:27 PM
Title: Re: Agent Orange compared to Dynamo
Post by: jls on April 15, 2009, 02:26:00 PM
quote:
Agent Orange or Dynamo? Hmmm, that's a real toughie. Isn't that kind of like choosing between nasal congestion and diarrhea? I mean, both options pretty much suck.





Wow,  I love this guy!!!!

jls

Edited on 4/16/2009 10:49 AM
Title: Re: Agent Orange compared to Dynamo
Post by: taylorj99 on April 15, 2009, 02:34:34 PM
quote:
Re-read my post numb nuts. I answered it succinctly.

 


Yep, I re-read your post. Still garbage. You've got some gall calling anyone numbnuts with your track record.
Title: Re: Agent Orange compared to Dynamo
Post by: Steven on April 15, 2009, 02:51:56 PM
quote:
And nice job trolling yourself Steven, called us out but couldn't answer the question being the Lane#1 cult member that you are.
 


Francine: I couldn't answer the question, because, I don't have either ball. I will probably have both sometime over the next several months, but not now.

So I don't go out on the limb and talk about how many boards they require, or offer yes/no absolutes about 'ball of the year', or say with conviction that one or the other is a smash machine.

What I do know is that a serious question was asked, and that you and the other trolls are in a feeding frenzy over it. And how nice of jls to do Lane#1 a 'favor' by leaving his mark on the forum the way a dog does on a pole.

Just look at the all star cast of obnoxious diversion who have blessed us with their presence:

jls
CGsSuK
Sleepy LaBeef (aka, Beef Cake)
Harry Ballsagna
Frankie Abralon (Francine, take a bow)

BTW, trying to keep the thread on track is in keeping with the intent of the topic. I'm sure your pad is not worn to the point where you don't get that.
Title: Re: Agent Orange compared to Dynamo
Post by: taylorj99 on April 15, 2009, 03:37:45 PM
quote:
What track record is that, calling out hacks like yourself and not sugar coating sh!t for you?  


Just because you throw around insults doesn't mean you called anyone out. You only emphasized how little you really have to offer.

 
quote:
If you want nice, you've come to the wrong place.


Nope. Just common decency

 
quote:
I could have said, why does a 165 average donk want to buy one of two high end balls when the clear choice would be to buy lessons.


Now that would have at least been constructive.

 
quote:
I didn't, and until you have a shred of credibility, I'd suggest leaving the posting to the big boys who don't drink out of a sippy cup. You're welcome.


I don't need for you to approve my credibility. Thanks though. It's old decrepid guys like you, who wish they were half the bowler, their minds fabricated they used to be, that I wish I could meet face to face. Doesn't matter though. The only thing you contribute, to most threads, is mind numbing drivel. Thanks.

 
quote:
You are right numbnuts. He asked if anybody has THROWN both. You said you have only seen the AO go down the lane. Apparently you can't read.  


I can read well enough to know that you haven't either. In fact I'd be willing to venture a guess and say that you've thrown neither. Either way, you didn't contribute. Thanks.
Title: Re: Agent Orange compared to Dynamo
Post by: jls on April 15, 2009, 04:22:15 PM
quote:
U guys suck I mean the guy asks a simple quesion and you do nuthing but waste everyone's time with that grbage So what if he averages 165 maybe a topend ball is just what he needs to get over th hump and if you guys aren't gonna help you should not say nothing.

Steven is the only guy who's trying to be helpful and even if he's only gonna have the balls in a few months at least he'll buy them.  By that time there will be newer and better stuff for sure but not everyone can get new stuff as soon as they come out and have to wait for deals or used stuff you can't blaim him for that.

I don't have iether ball but if i did Id for shure help this guy if I culd.




This reply is a joke right????

Blame, either,  sure, garbage,   nothing,  could!!!  Come on wtf.  This is a joke right???

Is there an election coming up for redneck sawhead of the year???

You want to help him,  tell him to buy a Virtual or a Rogue!!!!

now

are we clear


Don't you just love it when their heads explode!!!
--------------------
jls
Title: Re: Agent Orange compared to Dynamo
Post by: jls on April 15, 2009, 04:33:17 PM
quote:
yeah buy a virtual 10 pin machine





You hit 9 boy, you get 9 boy!!!!

real bowlers, adjust!!!!
--------------------
jls
Title: Re: Agent Orange compared to Dynamo
Post by: bowlerdawg on April 15, 2009, 07:44:44 PM
quote:
Is this a serious question?  oops

I'm sorry,  the devil made me say that.
--------------------
jls






Edited on 4/15/2009 4:32 PM




this was uncalled for, and your like troll chum
the trolls smell you and come running

he has a legitimate question, and you hijack and ruin his thread

stick to golf and roto- router where you can at least add some positive information on this site

you are pathetic for starting this troll feeding frenzy
--------------------
I'm your huckleberry
Title: Re: Agent Orange compared to Dynamo
Post by: bowlerdawg on April 15, 2009, 07:46:25 PM
quote:
the dynamo is the ball of the yr, agent orange was going to be, but now the massacre might be...


you are no better than jls for continuing on this childish, immature , and non topic related response

no go look at schleppy la wana hava need a beefs aZs
he is you man lover
--------------------
I'm your huckleberry
Title: Re: Agent Orange compared to Dynamo
Post by: bowlerdawg on April 15, 2009, 07:47:43 PM
quote:
Just to let eveyone know I posted here as well..

BTW, Cm is now ball of the year..just so you know..
--------------------
President and founding member of Lucky Lefty's ball of the week club!!

Motto: We have more balls than you!!


no topic related banter from another troll low life
are you jls's main go to booty calling boy
--------------------
I'm your huckleberry
Title: Re: Agent Orange compared to Dynamo
Post by: bowlerdawg on April 15, 2009, 07:49:09 PM
quote:
Dynamo needs a 44 board wide lane, which most centers don't have. Go with the Agent Orange.


kinda on subject, but w/ way to much smart aZz involved
there is a patch you can add on to the lane
a lh and a rh version, but most centers can't afford it


--------------------
I'm your huckleberry
Title: Re: Agent Orange compared to Dynamo
Post by: bowlerdawg on April 15, 2009, 07:50:42 PM
quote:
quote:
An honest question is asked, an the troll feast starts like clock work.

Amazing.


He could have clicked on one of the 17 other links talking about both of these balls, yet made a seperate post almost inviting criticism.  Trolling I think not... Pointing out idiocy in a sarcastic manner very much so.  And nice job trolling yourself Steven, called us out but couldn't answer the question being the Lane#1 cult member that you are.

Edited on 4/15/2009 2:19 PM


nothing of value to add Frank
hummmmmmmm
you are of no value, and you offer no value
interesting

your a low life jls terd wana be
now stfu
--------------------
I'm your huckleberry
Title: Re: Agent Orange compared to Dynamo
Post by: bowlerdawg on April 15, 2009, 07:52:07 PM
quote:
Agent Orange or Dynamo? Hmmm, that's a real toughie. Isn't that kind of like choosing between nasal congestion and diarrhea? I mean, both options pretty much suck.


Harry

what does this response have to do with the question
have you used a dynamo, and an agent orange

I did not think so

now STFU, and go back to looking at zoo animals on the web
--------------------
I'm your huckleberry
Title: Re: Agent Orange compared to Dynamo
Post by: bowlerdawg on April 15, 2009, 07:59:31 PM

--------------------
I'm your huckleberry
Title: Re: Agent Orange compared to Dynamo
Post by: buzzaussie299 on April 15, 2009, 09:13:50 PM
same old tired crap from a nobody.i sit here ready the forums and see a great question,a constructive question of which everyone can learn and listen,man i even read other forums to hear about success and other great stories,,,,where do these handpumps come from,why do they destroy this site...............i personally dont measure up to bomb cores or the buzzbomb core,i have owned plenty,i will give the dynamo a rip tho.......not because of the advertising,or the banter,critisism,or garbage from trolls.............BUT BECAUSE ITS LANE 1 AND I THROW LANE 1 ,,,,,,i have an 800 series with storm (eraser blaze) and have own plenty of others. i am not biassed at all.i throw lane 1 because it carries better for me,and if a ball is designed for dry,medium,oil,playing straight ,crossing boards,it does what it says it will.........if you cant answer the question,please restrain yourself so someone else can.......my kids read this forum and the sh... drop wasnt very professional at all...got a laugh....but not needed........thanks
--------------------
black raspberry saw
emerald saw
enriched uranium stacked
pearl uranium
pearl carbide
xxxl starburst
h20 buzzsaw
solid uranium
bullet buzzsaw
tsunami
uranium hrg
supernova solid
wanted single drill right hand blueberry 15 lb
wanted single drill right hand silver diamond 15lb
Title: Re: Agent Orange compared to Dynamo
Post by: buzzaussie299 on April 15, 2009, 10:25:40 PM
i think the bombs were a problem for me as these things were not clear to my driller , but we tried 4 times and in the end went for earlier gear like the black rasp and emerald and blueberry ,now i stick to the older gear....BUT i have a supernova and hrg which i love so i put it down to sticking with the true diamonds as much as possible.......my list i trimmed as it offended people for its length but hopefully the dynamo will be a turning point...also i own a bullet which i love so the chainsaw will be next.........as i have watched jason belmonte for years in the melbourne cup live and seen what destruction he creates with his storm gear......i one day will ask him if ever he is in melbourne around with noone around...to throw a saw just so i can see for myself   WHAT IF     .........DYNAMO FOR ME NEXT
--------------------
black raspberry saw
emerald saw
enriched uranium stacked
pearl uranium
pearl carbide
xxxl starburst
h20 buzzsaw
solid uranium
bullet buzzsaw
tsunami
uranium hrg
supernova solid
wanted single drill right hand blueberry 15 lb
wanted single drill right hand silver diamond 15lb
Title: Re: Agent Orange compared to Dynamo
Post by: Nicanor on April 16, 2009, 09:25:05 AM
The Agent Orange for me is much more controlled then the Dynamo.  The AO doesn't have the gigantic backend the dynamo has.  The Dynamo box, AO at 2000.  The Dynamo I have has the pin in the ring finger and the MB/CG kicked right about 2 inches of the thumb.  The length on this ball suprised me.  When it hit the break point it made a very strong move to the pocket.  The AO playing the same line did not recover as well.  Moved a little right and the ball still carried tremendously.

For me, the Dynamo is a much better swing ball then the AO.  The AO is more of a roll ball and the Dynamo is more of an explosive ball.  With the Dynamo I can chase the oil line all the way across the lane with great carry, but if I try that with the AO, quickly it will leave 10 pins.

So for more of down and in control with great carry I like the AO.  If I want to open up the lane, I like to use the Dynamo.


--------------------
Nicanor (Ten On The Deck)
Title: Re: Agent Orange compared to Dynamo
Post by: absoluteisanidiot on April 16, 2009, 10:31:59 AM
Are we clear that has to be the gayest saying I have ever heard.  Now that I think about how cool you really are jls and how proud your parents must be and the wonderful up bringing you must of had I can only say I'm sorry you turned out this way because your birth certificate is an apology from the condom factory.

NOW ARE WE CLEAR.

Go play in the road your special.
Title: Re: Agent Orange compared to Dynamo
Post by: absoluteisanidiot on April 16, 2009, 10:43:21 AM
Thanks for the heads up.

Edited on 4/16/2009 10:58 AM
Title: Re: Agent Orange compared to Dynamo
Post by: bowlerdawg on April 16, 2009, 11:46:32 AM
if i had something to share with regards to the original post ( that had already not been shared ) then i would have addressed it, but its hard to see relevant topic related things with all you non topic related post in the way

and i guess enough people have complained about me
so i will be banned shortly

so you won't be bothered with me

G'day
--------------------
I'm your huckleberry
Title: Re: Agent Orange compared to Dynamo
Post by: taylorj99 on April 16, 2009, 11:56:49 AM
The primary problem is that most Lane #1 detractors never offer anything constructive in relation to the initial question. Most of it is useless snide remarks. If you have a real assessment of the ball, then I welcome all opinions. But to just bash a bowler for the equipment they throw is tantamount to discrimination. I personally don't frequent (troll) AMF, Elite, etc. boards because it doesn't matter to me what they're advertising and/or selling. It's their choice and I don't need to convert anyone.

The second problem is double sided. First you have guys who will defend their "brand", and rightfully so, but get offended too easily if someone questions their motives/advertising/claims/manufacturing/sales. Then you have the guys who are well aware of that and take advantage of each and every situation where they can rub someone the wrong way.

Then of course there are people who just like to start crap about anything. That's a different class altogether. Those are the guys I'd like to tea bag with my 3 ball roller.
Title: Re: Agent Orange compared to Dynamo
Post by: taylorj99 on April 16, 2009, 12:03:21 PM
quote:
WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA  


2Bar Bowl
700 E Carlson St.
Cheyenne, WY

Ask for James. I'll show you what the bottom of my bag looks like.
Title: Re: Agent Orange compared to Dynamo
Post by: bowlerdawg on April 16, 2009, 12:03:34 PM
quote:
quote:
The primary problem is that most Lane #1 detractors never offer anything constructive in relation to the initial question. Most of it is useless snide remarks. If you have a real assessment of the ball, then I welcome all opinions. But to just bash a bowler for the equipment they throw is tantamount to discrimination. I personally don't frequent (troll) AMF, Elite, etc. boards because it doesn't matter to me what they're advertising and/or selling. It's their choice and I don't need to convert anyone.

The second problem is double sided. First you have guys who will defend their "brand", and rightfully so, but get offended too easily if someone questions their motives/advertising/claims/manufacturing/sales. Then you have the guys who are well aware of that and take advantage of each and every situation where they can rub someone the wrong way.

Then of course there are people who just like to start crap about anything. That's a different class altogether. Those are the guys I'd like to tea bag with my 3 ball roller.



WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA


its ok we know you don't know how to use words, but its something you can work on in the future

think of it as a goal

your a winner
--------------------
I'm your huckleberry
Title: Re: Agent Orange compared to Dynamo
Post by: taylorj99 on April 16, 2009, 12:07:21 PM
quote:
Sorry pal, I'm not into your homoerotic escapades.


That's what I thought.
Title: Re: Agent Orange compared to Dynamo
Post by: taylorj99 on April 16, 2009, 12:11:53 PM
quote:
Internet tough guy huh. Are you wearing your TAPOUT t-shirt today?



I'll PM you my home address too if you want to find out. Let's see if your aZZ can cash the checks your keyboard's been writing.
Title: Re: Agent Orange compared to Dynamo
Post by: taylorj99 on April 16, 2009, 12:22:17 PM
quote:
"Watch out! Another sawhead's head is about to explode."  


It's not even about being a sawhead anymore. I'm just tired of the disrespectful comments.
Title: Re: Agent Orange compared to Dynamo
Post by: taylorj99 on April 16, 2009, 12:30:39 PM
If that's all this forum has become, then maybe it is time to "Tap Out". It's obvious to me that most of the people posting in the Lane #1 forum fall into two groups. Those who have nothing to offer. And those who do, but can't express anything without being bashed.
Title: Re: Agent Orange compared to Dynamo
Post by: Steven on April 16, 2009, 12:45:01 PM
quote:
Saying how great the ball is because they can miss right and it hooks back, and miss left and it holds isn't offering anything useful, because those of us in the REAL bowling world call that a THS.  


Francine: You're pad has to be worn to the nub to make an assessment like the  one above. What kind of magic powers do you have to know the profile of the typical 'sawhead'?

The thing is, you don't. So you have to jump into all kinds of virtual reality stereotypes to justify your existence here.

Time for a pad refresh.

Edited on 4/16/2009 12:48 PM
Title: Re: Agent Orange compared to Dynamo
Post by: taylorj99 on April 16, 2009, 12:45:20 PM
quote:
Saying how great the ball is because they can miss right and it hooks back, and miss left and it holds isn't offering anything useful, because those of us in the REAL bowling world call that a THS.  


Real bowling world? Whatever. Everyone knows. There's no elite group of house hacks that have a secret bowling knowledge database. Bottom line is that "miss right and it hooks back" is more easily ignored than "it's garbage", or "diarrhea whatever".

I come here for Real opinions and reviews, and to occasionally list a ball or two for sale. I sift through the garbage to find useful information and take reviews at face value. Sometimes I try to help out younger, less experienced bowlers without berating them or calling them names. The problem is becoming that there is too much garbage and too little useful information.

I also would like to apologize to a idkmybff4u2c. Normally, I'm a very calm, introspective person. I lost my cool. I am sorry.
Title: Re: Agent Orange compared to Dynamo
Post by: jls on April 16, 2009, 12:52:17 PM
May I say that yes,  sometimes we poke fun at the sawheads...  Some of us don't understand or like some of the advertising done by Lane One....

And there are other ball companies that do the same thing.....

It just seems that when we do try to ask  a question or address a topic,  the sawheads go postal....

So then we respond back....and things get ugly....

Now as a real pro shop who has sold Lane One for years and years,  I like their product.  And their POLISH.  Not some of their ads.....

This all started about a month or so ago when someone asked why the Dynamo is the ball of the year.    And of course the 5 boards wider thing....
The response he got wasn't pretty!!!!!

To us, that was a joke,  so it is hard to take things so seriously on this site.

Now as for B-dawg and Steven.....  We go at it, but it is all in fun....

And usually both of them will address a topic,  before they give you both barrels....

I enjoy talking to both of them.  And who knows, some day we may actually agree on something.  But then, that would be boring....

Now speaking for only myself,  let me say to the sawheads that I'm sorry we don't see eye to eye.

Have  a good day gentlemen.
--------------------
jls
Title: Re: Agent Orange compared to Dynamo
Post by: jls on April 16, 2009, 01:03:47 PM
CG,   That was a type "o"

it's really

jsl

But seriously, one must admit they are extremely loyal!!!!
--------------------
jls
Title: Re: Agent Orange compared to Dynamo
Post by: jls on April 16, 2009, 01:18:08 PM
quote:
i understand your having a weak moment....you should take the rest of the day off and clock in again tomorrow...



Well it may seem that way, but the truth is I do not dislike Lane One or Ebonite.   Just not always eye to eye with some of their ads!!!!

And I will admit, that "ball of the year" thing got to me.....

However,  May I be the first to say I think "the Sauce"   should be the Polish of the year.

Excellent product Beans came up with!!!!

Yes it is a little pricy,  but you only need to use 3-4 drops.....

So a 4 oz bottle will go a long way....  And so will your ball!!!!

Now if you will excuse me,  I must go watch the Cubs on my brand new 32" wide screen TV,  HDTV.....

Sad note though.... No womens golf on till next week.

I can't wait to see Paula's butt or Natalie's boobs on wide screen HDTV....

But at least I have C-Max....   porn at 10pm every night...
--------------------
jls

Edited on 4/16/2009 1:19 PM
Title: Re: Agent Orange compared to Dynamo
Post by: bowlerdawg on April 16, 2009, 01:19:57 PM
quote:
i understand your having a weak moment....you should take the rest of the day off and clock in again tomorrow...


no hes not you boy toy wana be

he is having a mature moment
big difference
now you 3/4 trolls that all live together and have your circle jerks everyday
get back to each other
--------------------
I'm your huckleberry
Title: Re: Agent Orange compared to Dynamo
Post by: jls on April 16, 2009, 02:14:42 PM
Inverted,   52"!!!!   I don't know if I can handle watching womens golf on that big a screen.

Michelle Wie's camel toe might blind me.
--------------------
jls
Title: Re: Agent Orange compared to Dynamo
Post by: bowlerdawg on April 16, 2009, 02:54:51 PM
takes the trolls 4-5 days to recover after they have taxed their last brain cells, and once the last remaining brain cell they have recovers
then they come back for a visit

as you have witnessed here

+1 CRD

CRD isn't that what is left behind in your underwear when you poop in your pants ?

im pretty sure

the name suits you well

glad to see you back
--------------------
I'm your huckleberry
Title: Re: Agent Orange compared to Dynamo
Post by: bowlerdawg on April 16, 2009, 03:22:08 PM
quote:
I feel it's safe to say that bowlerdawg could easily be Exhibit A as to why everyone hates Sawheads. Way to crusade for us trolls, donk.


pot meet kettle, and you are why sawheads cant stand trolls
--------------------
I'm your huckleberry
Title: Re: Agent Orange compared to Dynamo
Post by: jls on April 16, 2009, 03:51:00 PM
quote:
wouldn't michele wie have a panda toe




sir
Panda toe, camel toe,  heck I don't care what they call it, as long as I can get to see it.

And now on my new 32" flat screen HDTV.  In black and white and living color!!


Is this a great country or what?


btw, 10 more minutes to Everybody loves Raymond....  Debra is a hottie!!!!
--------------------
jls
Title: Re: Agent Orange compared to Dynamo
Post by: Buddy Christ on April 16, 2009, 03:55:25 PM
quote:
btw, 10 more minutes to Everybody loves Raymond....  Debra is a hottie!!!!
--------------------
jls

Whatever happened to good shows like that? Seinfeld, King of Queens, Home Improvement.. Now all we have is crap!
Title: Re: Agent Orange compared to Dynamo
Post by: Steven on April 16, 2009, 06:28:23 PM
quote:
Hate to disappoint Steven, but stereotypes are typically made up from the majority.  


Frankie: I'm disappointed you'd say something so simplistic. The 'majority' of Lemmings will happily herd and jump off a cliff. There are lots of other examples of 'majority' thinking that don't make much more sense.  

 
quote:
And being the mathematician I am, we typically assume first in order to get to an answer.


There is an old saying that tends to be true most of the time: When You Assume, You Make an Ass of U and Me. That's "U" in saying it, and "Me" in having to read it.

Hopefully you get the point. Taking "stereotypes" to heart and "assuming" based on incomplete information leads to the worst kind of ignorance. Rise above the trolling idiocy of CGsSuK, jls, Harry Ballsagna, and idkmybff4u2c. You're the one troll with the capability to rise above the knowledge cesspool the others choose to swim in.

There is a lot of quality Lane#1 equipment that can help improve the consistency of your game. Strive to be an educated bowler.

Edited on 4/16/2009 6:29 PM
Title: Re: Agent Orange compared to Dynamo
Post by: jls on April 16, 2009, 06:42:15 PM
quote:
quote:
Hate to disappoint Steven, but stereotypes are typically made up from the majority.  


Frankie: I'm disappointed you'd say something so simplistic. The 'majority' of Lemmings will happily herd and jump off a cliff. There are lots of other examples of 'majority' thinking that don't make much more sense.  

 
quote:
And being the mathematician I am, we typically assume first in order to get to an answer.


There is an old saying that tends to be true most of the time: When You Assume, You Make an Ass of U and Me. That's "U" in saying it, and "Me" in having to read it.

Hopefully you get the point. Taking "stereotypes" to heart and "assuming" based on incomplete information leads to the worst kind of ignorance. Rise above the trolling idiocy of CGsSuK, jls, Harry Ballsagna, and idkmybff4u2c. You're the one troll with the capability to rise above the knowledge cesspool the others choose to swim in.

There is a lot of quality Lane#1 equipment that can help improve the consistency of your game. Strive to be an educated bowler.

Edited on 4/16/2009 6:29 PM





Steven,  may I call you Steven.

Here is another example of how you love to come on and bash people who don't see your point of view.   There is really no point in trying to be nice or civil with you.  Cause when we do that,  you sink to you usually low level and attack.

CG....  notice, this is not a weak moment.  

Steven,  All this crap with you started when a few of us had the nerve to ask a question in the Dynamo thread......

You come on with your hollier then thou attitude,   It's a serious question crap,  in this thread.....

But in other threads were some of us asked a question,  you the mouth of this site bash us....

Your a hypocrite......  It's ok for one of you to ask a question,  that's serious..... But if we ask a question like,  who in the world declared this ball the "ball of the year"  we get your attitude.  Stinking attitude.

Steven,  you are one sick first class Hypocrite.

Now boy,  I could care less what you say anymore,  you have zero class,  and that is why so many on this site do not like sawheads. Because you all think your poo poo doesn't stink.... It does boy!!!

Now

are we clear

goodbye

Now I will sit and watch this hypocrite's head explode!!!!





--------------------
jls
Title: Re: Agent Orange compared to Dynamo
Post by: triggerman on April 16, 2009, 06:46:46 PM
its threads like this one that keeps posters like myself from coming around period

if the OP wants an honest opinion of the two balls he asked about i would be more then happy to tell you what i think of them, as compared to other balls i have seen
i personally have both in the bag and throw both on a regular basis
--------------------
www.bowlingballexchange.com

Triggerman

F.O.S Loud, F.O.S. Proud

Lane #1 Baby

Title: Re: Agent Orange compared to Dynamo
Post by: Steven on April 16, 2009, 07:03:03 PM
quote:
Here is another example of how you love to come on and bash people who don't see your point of view. There is really no point in trying to be nice or civil with you. Cause when we do that, you sink to you usually low level and attack.


jls: LOL, cut the BS. You're on record as being here just to liven things up and bring 'free' attention to the Lane#1 forum. That's fine (well, not really), but don't try to pretend you're here to do anything other than stir up trouble. As a proshop operator who should be representing the sport, you can provide more value than endlessly bashing a marketing only 'Ball of the Year" statement. Really, give it a rest.

Man up and provide some valid input on the Dynamo vs. the AO. If you haven't seen both in action, you're spending too much time watching reruns of Raymond and not enough time keeping up to speed on products you should be familiar with. Do this, and you have my apologies for labeling you a hopeless unredeemable troll.
Title: Re: Agent Orange compared to Dynamo
Post by: Brickguy221 on April 17, 2009, 12:57:10 AM
quote:
its threads like this one that keeps posters like myself from coming around period

if the OP wants an honest opinion of the two balls he asked about i would be more then happy to tell you what i think of them, as compared to other balls i have seen
i personally have both in the bag and throw both on a regular basis
--------------------
www.bowlingballexchange.com

Triggerman

F.O.S Loud, F.O.S. Proud

Lane #1 Baby

 


+1 I'm with Triggerman here. This is exactly the reason I quit posting and seldom even come on Ball Reviews to read and post anymore.
--------------------
"Whenever I feel the urge to exercise I lie down until the feeling passes away."

Brick
Title: Re: Agent Orange compared to Dynamo
Post by: bowlerdawg on April 17, 2009, 07:29:54 AM
+2 triggie
me too
--------------------
I'm your huckleberry
Title: Re: Agent Orange compared to Dynamo
Post by: Jeffrevs on April 17, 2009, 08:13:31 AM
quote:
its threads like this one that keeps posters like myself from coming around period

if the OP wants an honest opinion of the two balls he asked about i would be more then happy to tell you what i think of them, as compared to other balls i have seen
i personally have both in the bag and throw both on a regular basis
--------------------
www.bowlingballexchange.com

Triggerman

F.O.S Loud, F.O.S. Proud

Lane #1 Baby




+100 !!!  I'm the 101st (I think) response to a question, simple question asked about comparing 2 balls.  And ....in typical fashion 4 to 6 people are making it their own troll-fest that's become, well....asinine
--------------------
Jeff
The Revless Wonder and King Douchebag!
Title: Re: Agent Orange compared to Dynamo
Post by: Deathclutch on April 17, 2009, 08:17:27 AM
quote:
quote:
its threads like this one that keeps posters like myself from coming around period

if the OP wants an honest opinion of the two balls he asked about i would be more then happy to tell you what i think of them, as compared to other balls i have seen
i personally have both in the bag and throw both on a regular basis
--------------------
www.bowlingballexchange.com

Triggerman

F.O.S Loud, F.O.S. Proud

Lane #1 Baby




+100 !!!  I'm the 101st (I think) response to a question, simple question asked about comparing 2 balls.  And ....in typical fashion 4 to 6 people are making it their own troll-fest that's become, well....asinine
--------------------
Jeff
The Revless Wonder and King Douchebag!


Ditto!
--------------------
F.O.S.
Title: Re: Agent Orange compared to Dynamo
Post by: goose194 on April 17, 2009, 08:24:15 AM
Same here Trigg.

dougb, you want a serious responce, go to bowlingballexchange.com and ask.

Edited on 4/17/2009 8:49 AM
Title: Re: Agent Orange compared to Dynamo
Post by: triggerman on April 17, 2009, 08:44:08 AM
quote:
Anybody thrown both of these balls?  I'm curious how they compare.

Thanks

Doug
I have these two balls, similar pins and tops, both drilled very very similar, surfaces very similar

by similar I mean
AO is drilled 45* x 4.5 pin to pap x 40
Dynamo is drilled 55* x 4.5 pin to pap x 45

this resulted in a cg out on the AO (maybe out 1")
dyanmo a true stack
both do not have balance holes

AO surface is 4k abralon no polish
Dynamo is 4k abralon with polish

strengths

AO is very strong in the mids, with the 4k goes about 2 feet longer then the dynamo, it does react hard but not as hard as the dynamo to the dry with the 4k gets thru the heads easily

Dynamo is very strong off the dry, but loves the oil line, i can play deeper inside with the dynamo vs the AO AO doenst seem to have the 5th arrow recovery unlessw the lanes are used up

with the dynamo I usually use it first out, left foot on 35 targeting 15 at the arrows, to about the 6 at the break, ball makes it easily, (AO is a little weak at this line on our fresh semi heavy league shot)if I get the dynamo outside the 6 at the break it is way to hard on the turn, and will leave nasty nasty leaves  I can typically use the dynamo for 1.5 games without moving, and instead of moving I go to the AO and play the same line, what i get is a cleaner move thru the heads with a very good turn.

In closing I can interchange these two balls, and use them exclusively for the entire set.  on a little lighter oil i go AO on heavier I go dynamo  If you wanted just one, I dont think I could pick.  I love the dynamo, but teammate who has both chooses AO  they have different hits, and different carry strengths

for house shots, i think the AO may be better, but I like the dyanmo roll better for my game

my vote, Dynamo
teammate AO

we both average 210+ on this league shot

on edit
my dynamo is stronger then virtual gravity, slightly longer as well, it also is stronger then rogue (pot bowling against league members, have proben this to me many nights over
other teammate throws a cell and a playmaker and the AO kills him all the time, so mch so he bought one and loves it
--------------------
www.bowlingballexchange.com

Triggerman

F.O.S Loud, F.O.S. Proud

Lane #1 Baby



Edited on 4/17/2009 8:47 AM
Title: Re: Agent Orange compared to Dynamo
Post by: bowlerdawg on April 17, 2009, 09:02:45 AM
ty triggie for bringing sanity to an insane post, and answering the op's question.

I have no hands on w/ the AO otherwise I would have posted my side by side also.
--------------------
I'm your huckleberry
Title: Re: Agent Orange compared to Dynamo
Post by: jls on April 17, 2009, 11:10:38 AM
Steven and friends,  it's only a serious question when one of the groupies ask a question.  When other's ask,  all hell breaks out.

That Steven is exactly what happened to Oddballs.  He darned to ask why the Dynamo was being called the ball of the year.  he got a rude crude reply.  

They I pointed out that Oddballs simply asked a question, and got a rude crude reply.  And guess what, then I got you Steven.....

Now all you little make believe wan a bees can say whatever you want.  It's all there in that original thread....

You groupies come on and try to act so important, but your not...  You try to act like  you're  Lane One's best customers!!!!

Yet most of you buy their balls on ebay, used!!!!!!

Bottom line here is simple,  you groupies show zero respect for anyone who post on this site that is not a groupie....

Then people like Steven list their names and bashes them in his cute little boring post....

And if they respond to your bashing,  you cry like little geek babies.

And then you have the nerve, the gall, more crust then a pie factory to say,  "we asked a serious questopn, and want a serious answer"  

But if anyone else asks a serious question, like who in their right mind declared this ball, the "ball of the year"   why that's not  a serious question???

Steven,  you are a total boring little geek groupie wan a bee, who likes to come on and play, Joe Pro Bowler Pro shop....

Now groupies,   go back and read the original thread on the Dynamo, and you will plainly see that all Oddballs did was ask a question.  And I followed up on it.  And the blasted by the groupies began.....

And when we respond, you cry like babies....

now

are we clear

Steven,  all of your future replies to me will be filed,  in the gaebage...

still clear

BTW Steven,   If the day comes where I ever see a bowler using either the A.O. or the Dynamo, I will stop watching Raymond!!!!!

But you see Steven,  I come from a small town of about 9 million people....
And I have never ever seen a single bowler using an A. O. or the Dynamo.

See zillions of Virtual's, Rogue, Bites, Cells, but still have not seen one bowler with the A.O. or the Dynamo.....

"A zillion, that's a lot"

So Steven, since I have plenty of reads on those balls,  I'll continue to watch Raymond....

And you and your friends,  why feel free to come on and act important...
--------------------
jls

Edited on 4/17/2009 11:15 AM
Title: Re: Agent Orange compared to Dynamo
Post by: absoluteisanidiot on April 17, 2009, 11:28:10 AM
BORING,USELESS,DRIBBLE GARBAGE FROM OUR FRIEND JLS.  YOUR THE BEST AND QUITE SPECIAL.
Title: Re: Agent Orange compared to Dynamo
Post by: Steven on April 17, 2009, 11:32:45 AM
quote:
But if anyone else asks a serious question, like who in their right mind declared this ball, the "ball of the year" why that's not a serious question???


jls: You've asked the "ball of the year" question a million times. Very early in your endless search for the 'truth', I politely responded that the answer is to call Lane#1 and ask them yourself. That's the only way you'd get a straight answer, because it's their statement. But as always, you went off on one of your menopausal moments and refused. Why? because you're not really interested in the truth. You just want an endless soapbox to bash Lane#1 and the people who enjoy throwing the product.

The question was never serious. Please, stop the charade.  


 
quote:
Steven, you are a total boring little geek groupie wan a bee, who likes to come on and play, Joe Pro Bowler Pro shop....


Well jls, if you didn't come on to play irresponsible troll instead of responsible proshop operator, maybe I wouldn't have to fill the 'valid input' gap for you. In the sister thread, I gave a response to the AO vs. Dynamo question. But you still insist your time is more valuable watching Raymond reruns than understanding the products available to your customers. I guess I'm taking valuable time away from Raymond and your other soaps. Please feel fee to go back to 'work'.
Title: Re: Agent Orange compared to Dynamo
Post by: jls on April 17, 2009, 11:38:06 AM
quote:
quote:
But if anyone else asks a serious question, like who in their right mind declared this ball, the "ball of the year" why that's not a serious question???


jls: You've asked the "ball of the year" question a million times. Very early in your endless search for the 'truth', I politely responded that the answer is to call Lane#1 and ask them yourself. That's the only way you'd get a straight answer, because it's their statement. But as always, you went off on one of your menopausal moments and refused. Why? because you're not really interested in the truth. You just want an endless soapbox to bash Lane#1 and the people who enjoy throwing the product.

The question was never serious. Please, stop the charade.  


 
quote:
Steven, you are a total boring little geek groupie wan a bee, who likes to come on and play, Joe Pro Bowler Pro shop....


Well jls, if you didn't come on to play irresponsible troll instead of responsible proshop operator, maybe I wouldn't have to fill the 'valid input' gap for you. In the sister thread, I gave a response to the AO vs. Dynamo question. But you still insist your time is more valuable watching Raymond reruns than understanding the products available to your customers. I guess I'm taking valuable time away from Raymond and your other soaps. Please feel fee to go back to 'work'.





Steven, may I call you,   well anyway.  

"Cause they said so"  is not a valid answer.
nor is,  "The F.O.S. thinks so"  a valid answer.

BTM magazine said so...... that would be a valid answer.


NOW your reply will be file in the appropriate place.  The garbage.

clear
--------------------
jls
Title: Re: Agent Orange compared to Dynamo
Post by: Jeffrevs on April 17, 2009, 12:03:33 PM
quote:
quote:
quote:
its threads like this one that keeps posters like myself from coming around period

if the OP wants an honest opinion of the two balls he asked about i would be more then happy to tell you what i think of them, as compared to other balls i have seen
i personally have both in the bag and throw both on a regular basis
--------------------
www.bowlingballexchange.com




+100 !!!  I'm the 101st (I think) response to a question, simple question asked about comparing 2 balls.  And ....in typical fashion 4 to 6 people are making it their own troll-fest that's become, well....asinine
--------------------
Jeff
The Revless Wonder and King Douchebag!


You know what the great part about your answer is?  The fact that you state there are 4 to 6 people making it a troll fest.  Yet you fail to realize that there are 15-20 others that make sure they point out those 4-6... hmmm pot --> kettle.. well you get the idea there, not to mention another 5-8 just quoting the post and simply adding in "ditto" or "+1"  Yet in the end you people blame myself, idk, Harry, jls for trolling?????


Maybe because those 15-20 are sick and tired of these 4-6 ?!?!?! Huh??

Not that I have to answer to you , you little squirming $$h!t, but ....
I saw a simple question post (which I usually read, regardless of what forum it is) and I noticed 80+ answers...hmmm...must be pretty interesting, right, so I read it....and of course, ...it's as troll fest.  And ...it's a shame that someone who wants an answer has his thread turned into this.  It's the crap that brings this site down, AND...may I add, ...ALWAYS HAS!! So if I'd like to "comment" and you want to think it's a "troll comment" ,...sobeit ...but in the mean time, ...buzz off!

Public forum, moron.  I'm not bashing his question or making his thread go off course, I actually commented on someone who brought the whole thing to attention.

Now, whoever you are, ...go away
--------------------
Jeff
The Revless Wonder and King Douchebag!

Edited on 4/17/2009 12:07 PM
Title: Re: Agent Orange compared to Dynamo
Post by: jls on April 17, 2009, 12:14:51 PM
quote:
quote:
quote:
quote:
its threads like this one that keeps posters like myself from coming around period

if the OP wants an honest opinion of the two balls he asked about i would be more then happy to tell you what i think of them, as compared to other balls i have seen
i personally have both in the bag and throw both on a regular basis
--------------------
www.bowlingballexchange.com




+100 !!!  I'm the 101st (I think) response to a question, simple question asked about comparing 2 balls.  And ....in typical fashion 4 to 6 people are making it their own troll-fest that's become, well....asinine
--------------------
Jeff
The Revless Wonder and King Douchebag!


You know what the great part about your answer is?  The fact that you state there are 4 to 6 people making it a troll fest.  Yet you fail to realize that there are 15-20 others that make sure they point out those 4-6... hmmm pot --> kettle.. well you get the idea there, not to mention another 5-8 just quoting the post and simply adding in "ditto" or "+1"  Yet in the end you people blame myself, idk, Harry, jls for trolling?????


Maybe because those 15-20 are sick and tired of these 4-6 ?!?!?! Huh??

Not that I have to answer to you , you little squirming $$h!t, but ....
I saw a simple question post (which I usually read, regardless of what forum it is) and I noticed 80+ answers...hmmm...must be pretty interesting, right, so I read it....and of course, ...it's as troll fest.  And ...it's a shame that someone who wants an answer has his thread turned into this.  It's the crap that brings this site down, AND...may I add, ...ALWAYS HAS!! So if I'd like to "comment" and you want to think it's a "troll comment" ,...sobeit ...but in the mean time, ...buzz off!

Public forum, moron.  I'm not bashing his question or making his thread go off course, I actually commented on someone who brought the whole thing to attention.

Now, whoever you are, ...go away
--------------------
Jeff
The Revless Wonder and King Douchebag!

Edited on 4/17/2009 12:07 PM





Jeff,  Your replied is acknowledged!!!!

And now it will be filed,  in the garbage.

Now why don't you go back to misc. non bowling related and continue on with your lastest post.  "one liners"



Oh and BTW,  maybe the moderater will notice your reply...  He has asked that the post remain civil....   Squirming What?????

Now another example of how you groupies go off on people....
Yet when the people you go off on reply,  you report them!!!!!

What is a Squirming SXXXXXT????

You see Jeff,  all some of us are doing is posting our side.  And when we do, 10-15 of you groupies come on and fuel the fire...  And then, cry!!!

clear
--------------------
jls
Title: Re: Agent Orange compared to Dynamo
Post by: jls on April 17, 2009, 12:17:51 PM
quote:
BORING,USELESS,DRIBBLE GARBAGE FROM OUR FRIEND JLS.  YOUR THE BEST AND QUITE SPECIAL.



Another example of a wan a bee...

Doing the insult thing....

If you don't like what some of us have to say,  why not Iggy us....

BTW,  I did not notice any replies in this thread from you on the topic....

Just your bashing!!!


--------------------
jls
Title: Re: Agent Orange compared to Dynamo
Post by: Jeffrevs on April 17, 2009, 12:19:31 PM
quote:
quote:
quote:
quote:
quote:
its threads like this one that keeps posters like myself from coming around period

if the OP wants an honest opinion of the two balls he asked about i would be more then happy to tell you what i think of them, as compared to other balls i have seen
i personally have both in the bag and throw both on a regular basis
--------------------
www.bowlingballexchange.com




+100 !!!  I'm the 101st (I think) response to a question, simple question asked about comparing 2 balls.  And ....in typical fashion 4 to 6 people are making it their own troll-fest that's become, well....asinine
--------------------
Jeff
The Revless Wonder and King Douchebag!


You know what the great part about your answer is?  The fact that you state there are 4 to 6 people making it a troll fest.  Yet you fail to realize that there are 15-20 others that make sure they point out those 4-6... hmmm pot --> kettle.. well you get the idea there, not to mention another 5-8 just quoting the post and simply adding in "ditto" or "+1"  Yet in the end you people blame myself, idk, Harry, jls for trolling?????


Maybe because those 15-20 are sick and tired of these 4-6 ?!?!?! Huh??

Not that I have to answer to you , you little squirming $$h!t, but ....
I saw a simple question post (which I usually read, regardless of what forum it is) and I noticed 80+ answers...hmmm...must be pretty interesting, right, so I read it....and of course, ...it's as troll fest.  And ...it's a shame that someone who wants an answer has his thread turned into this.  It's the crap that brings this site down, AND...may I add, ...ALWAYS HAS!! So if I'd like to "comment" and you want to think it's a "troll comment" ,...sobeit ...but in the mean time, ...buzz off!

Public forum, moron.  I'm not bashing his question or making his thread go off course, I actually commented on someone who brought the whole thing to attention.

Now, whoever you are, ...go away
--------------------
Jeff
The Revless Wonder and King Douchebag!

Edited on 4/17/2009 12:07 PM





Jeff,  Your replied is acknowledged!!!!

And now it will be filed,  in the garbage.

Now why don't you go back to misc. non bowling related and continue on with your lastest post.  "one liners"



Oh and BTW,  maybe the moderater will notice your reply...  He has asked that the post remain civil....   Squirming What?????

Now another example of how you groupies go off on people....
Yet when the people you go off on reply,  you report them!!!!!

What is a Squirming SXXXXXT????

You see Jeff,  all some of us are doing is posting our side.  And when we do, 10-15 of you groupies come on and fuel the fire...  And then, cry!!!

clear
--------------------
jls


Report them?!  Ugghh...you guys are so tiring!

squirming $$h!t....yeah...close enough, you get it, don't you ?

I'm not a Lane1 guy....so I have no idea what you're talking about ...no groupie here!

And hey, ...get a new word ok? the is "clear?" crap is getting old...
--------------------
Jeff
The Revless Wonder and King Douchebag!

Edited on 4/17/2009 12:31 PM
Title: Re: Agent Orange compared to Dynamo
Post by: jls on April 17, 2009, 12:38:51 PM
Jeff,  so your not here to address the topic,  your just here to bash some of us non groupies!!!

Now as for the "clear"

Are you kidding,  it's spreading like wildfire!!!

I should be getting paid a royality.



just in case you wanted to know
--------------------
jls
Title: Re: Agent Orange compared to Dynamo
Post by: Jeffrevs on April 17, 2009, 12:42:50 PM
quote:
Jeff,  so your not here to address the topic,  your just here to bash some of us non groupies!!!

Now as for the "clear"

Are you kidding,  it's spreading like wildfire!!!

I should be getting paid a royality.



just in case you wanted to know
--------------------
jls


The thread is LOOOOOOOOONG GONE by now .....my post didn't "ruin" anything!

Royalies, eh?!?! Hmmmmmmm
--------------------
Jeff
The Revless Wonder and King Douchebag!
Title: Re: Agent Orange compared to Dynamo
Post by: absoluteisanidiot on April 17, 2009, 12:58:15 PM
I answered the question in a different thread and quite professionally.   Good luck to you jls it's got to be a pleasure being you,  and as I've said before you have to be that kid that got his azz jacked in high school on a daily basis.   I would love to know the name of the pro shop your affiliated with just so I could give them a shout out about how professional you are and how much of a pleasure it is to have your superior knowledge of Lane#1 equipment because you spend most of your hard earned time in here giving nothing but the best advise money can't buy.  

Now are we clear probably not.
Title: Re: Agent Orange compared to Dynamo
Post by: jls on April 17, 2009, 01:37:31 PM
quote:
I answered the question in a different thread and quite professionally.   Good luck to you jls it's got to be a pleasure being you,  and as I've said before you have to be that kid that got his azz jacked in high school on a daily basis.   I would love to know the name of the pro shop your affiliated with just so I could give them a shout out about how professional you are and how much of a pleasure it is to have your superior knowledge of Lane#1 equipment because you spend most of your hard earned time in here giving nothing but the best advise money can't buy.  

Now are we clear probably not.



Did you mean?    Now are we clear, probably not.


Now as for your childish post.....
FILED.......In the garbage.


BTW  your name fits you to a tee.
--------------------
jls

Edited on 4/17/2009 1:52 PM
Title: Re: Agent Orange compared to Dynamo
Post by: Steven on April 17, 2009, 02:26:15 PM
quote:
FILED.......


jls: You have about 16 posts in this thread, and not a single valid answer to the topic. Nothing where I can say 'great information' and report "FILED".

Given all the great customer feedback on both the Dynamo and AO, I don't understand why you haven't pickup up one or both of the balls up for your own testing. It's great for potential business -- my proshop guy is constantly trying out the new 'hot' releases, regardless of company. As a result, he's able to talk intellegently about the bowling landscape. As an added bonus in your case, you'd have something constructive to offer on the forums.

I know it's a radical concept, but something to consider. It's got to beat the stigma being a registered troll and constantly being reminded of it. Frankie Abralon has shown the inclination to 'turn a new pad'.   There's an opporunity here for you too.
Title: Re: Agent Orange compared to Dynamo
Post by: Steven on April 17, 2009, 02:53:43 PM
quote:
The psuedo-intellectualism and sheer pomposity of Steven's answers  


CRD: As you should be aware, there are two threads proceeding on the AO/Dynamo question. The troll infested thread of which you are apart, and the 'legitimate' thread (part#2). In that thread, I offered the following:

 
quote:
First, I haven't personally used either ball. However, I do have the BuzzBomb (solid version of AO) and I've watched the AO and Dynamo in action by other bowlers who I have respect for.....

The AO appears more angular off the dry, while the Dynamo seems to have more of a hard arching characteristic. They are both aggressive, so it just depends on the type of breakpoint reaction you're trying to achieve.
 


Calling the above 'psuedo-intellectualism' is a reach, at least to those whose technical knowledge goes beyond knowing how to put their fingers in the ball.  

I looked for anything you've offered worth reading on the subject, and to no surprise, nothing! You have a remarkable way of living down to expectations. If anything, you're consistent.
Title: Re: Agent Orange compared to Dynamo
Post by: Steven on April 17, 2009, 03:20:29 PM
quote:
Little stalker, I am aware of all. What, no black eye emoticon? Yawn. Boring (as usual).


Stalker?? Didn't you do the calling out on this one?

Anyway, I've looked again for your input on the Dynamo and AO. Still can't find it. There should be no other reason for you to be here other than to provide value. I'm waiting for the greatness of CRD to show some insights. I'm tired of feeling dumber for reading your confusion.    
 
BTW, Dull people bore easily (which you prove again). So here are two black eyes at you...  
Title: Re: Agent Orange compared to Dynamo
Post by: bowlerdawg on April 17, 2009, 03:32:08 PM
Doug you really know how to get things stirred up
what with your question on your post

CRD........

just because you have fungus growing on you and in your drawers, does not mean that the rest of the world is infected and needs to be studied such as you have been. Most of the world is ok, but your comment helps me learn more and more about you every day

Crusty Rotten Drawers.......cause ...........fungus
which ,incidentally, has obviously now spread to your brain

thus the reason for your layoff

had to undergo more testing at the lab......

won't be long now before you tax that last brain cell again, and we can be rid of you again, if only for a moment. It was so nice and tranquil in your absence.
--------------------
I'm your huckleberry
Title: Re: Agent Orange compared to Dynamo
Post by: jls on April 17, 2009, 04:41:42 PM
quote:
crd do us a favor and go to forums of stuff u like already,,why do you wish  to live your life in the negative




Hey larry,  I want a good controll ball,  any suggestions? Not hook in the box!!!

Now for those who don't know what this means....

Groupies when asked this question,  said the Dynamo or the A.O.

50-1,  they would say the same thing if one asked for a 10 pin ball.

Larry, all you know how to do is throw out silly insults.

Now don't you have a bid on ebay to check out... boy






--------------------
jls
Title: Re: Agent Orange compared to Dynamo
Post by: jls on April 17, 2009, 04:45:30 PM
Steven,  How could I.....

Did you not hear me say that I HAVE NEVER EVER SEEN A HUMAN USING EITHER BALL.

In a city of 9 million people!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Now don't you have a bid on ebay......

$25 for a new brain!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

you are such a joke....

And Steven, just for the record....

All I did was ask a question,  is this a joke????

You see Steven,  in a city of 9 million,  I have not seen one Dynamo or A.O.

THAT IS WHY I THOUGHT HIS QUESTION WAS A JOKE....

I thought he was being funny....  since in a city of 9 million, I have never seen either of these balls......

Therefore Steven,  no way can I possibly answer his question.... For you see Steven, unlike a sawhead, I would try my best to answer the question correctly.

And I WOULD NEVER EVER SUGGEST  a dynamo or A.O. to someone looking for a control ball..... I would try to give an honest answer Steven.

Oh boy,  I think that bid for a brain went over your limit....  too bad



--------------------
jls

Edited on 4/17/2009 4:51 PM

Edited on 4/17/2009 4:52 PM
Title: Re: Agent Orange compared to Dynamo
Post by: Steven on April 17, 2009, 04:52:35 PM
quote:
Between your post and the double black eyes I just don't know if I can recover.  


Recovery is usually a multi-step process. Given your many issues, I can't believe you haven't already been through some serious rehab sessions. Regardless, for the purposes of this thread, recovery can start with the following, and I'll try to keep it simple:

1) Provide a meaningful contrast between the Dynamo and the AO. After all, that is the main purpose of the thread. You'll find that sharing useful information instead of sucking the life blood out of people will leave you feeling positive.

OR

2) If you don't have a clue (which I suspect is the case), at least be honest about why you're here. The introspection will be cleansing, and you might develop a circle beyond posters with names like Harry Ballsagna.

Edited on 4/17/2009 5:54 PM
Title: Re: Agent Orange compared to Dynamo
Post by: jls on April 17, 2009, 04:55:42 PM
Steven / CRD,  I must go,  I hope you two have a great debate.

Steven,  try to keep it clean and stop crying like a baby....

CRD...  go get him......Bang, another head explodes...

I  will check in tomorrow.

have fun men


--------------------
jls
Title: Re: Agent Orange compared to Dynamo
Post by: Steven on April 17, 2009, 05:04:00 PM
quote:
Did you not hear me say that I HAVE NEVER EVER SEEN A HUMAN USING EITHER BALL.

In a city of 9 million people!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 


Then why are you in this thread? Like CRD's presence, it makes no sense unless your sole purpose is to leave a mess for others to clean up.

Anyway, I already knew this, and that's why I suggested you pick up one or both balls for your own evaluation and testing. Any proshop owner worth his salt who has decent distributor relationships gets different equipment to check out. There should opportunities here if you pursued them. Do you personally bowl? Is that the issue for you not understanding equipment choices available?

BTW, the greater Los Angeles area is larger than Chicagoland, and there is plenty of Lane#1 to be found here. Population isn't the issue.
Title: Re: Agent Orange compared to Dynamo
Post by: bowlerdawg on April 17, 2009, 05:50:54 PM
quote:
Estremely insightful and intellectual post, bowler dawg.  Between your post and the double black eyes I just don't know if I can recover.  You guys are hilarious yet somehow boring at the same time.  Hard to do, to be sure.  Wouldn't expect anything less from a couple of F.O.S. members.  We non-believers have learned what miraculous things you guys are capable of doing.  You truly are special, bowlerdawg and little stalker.  BFF forever!


so if i am hearing you right you are saying the dynamo, A.K.A ball of the year, is your choice over the AO based solely on the dynamo's recovery characteristics ?

how silly of me i assumed you were involved in this thread to share your personal observations of the 2 balls side by side ?


thanks again for sharing your amazing powers of observation about the original question that was asked in such an educated fashion.

jls = terd
5 steps up the feeding chain from CRD

crd is just here for jls's sloppy seconds
--------------------
I'm your huckleberry
Title: Re: Agent Orange compared to Dynamo
Post by: bowlerdawg on April 17, 2009, 05:57:42 PM
jls's quote

quote:
Did you not hear me say that I HAVE NEVER EVER SEEN A HUMAN USING EITHER BALL.

In a city of 9 million people!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


this is supposed to mean something ?

you have not seen anything outside of your own rectal walls in decades, so its no surprise.

outside of your own arse
the only other thing you see is this computer screen

you have managed to post almost 10,000 post on this site alone in less than 3 years ( PATHETIC )

the last car you ever saw was your broken down  87'camaro in your trailers parking lot

get real and get lost

if your ZOO animal channel is fuzzy it is probably because CRD is stealing all your bandwith
--------------------
I'm your huckleberry
Title: Re: Agent Orange compared to Dynamo
Post by: Uncle Crusty on April 17, 2009, 05:58:56 PM
Three words for bowlerdawg, jls, Steven, et al: let it go. Did y'all ever think that if you didn't ramble on for 6 pages after a bit of prodding from some trolls that they'd have little cause to troll in the first place? Didn't think so...
--------------------
"Nobody in the game of football should be called a genius. A genius is somebody like Norman Einstein."

-Broadcasting Extraordinaire and Mensa Member Joe Theismann
Title: Re: Agent Orange compared to Dynamo
Post by: bowlerdawg on April 17, 2009, 06:05:03 PM
quote:
Three words for bowlerdawg, jls, Steven, et al: let it go. Did y'all ever think that if you didn't ramble on for 6 pages after a bit of prodding from some trolls that they'd have little cause to troll in the first place? Didn't think so...
--------------------
"Nobody in the game of football should be called a genius. A genius is somebody like Norman Einstein."

-Broadcasting Extraordinaire and Mensa Member Joe Theismann


 i hear what you are saying, and there would not be 6 pages of garbage if the trolls
jls, cg, idk, crd, francine , & harry would do just as you suggest
leave it alone.

see the very 1st post in the thread if that gives you any clue, and for the record I ain't backing down

trolls will go before i do
--------------------
I'm your huckleberry


** on edit **

the 1st post in the thread had been deleted by none other than ......jls
who sparked this troll L1 bash fest

so thank your boy

wonder why you would delete it ??????

Edited on 4/18/2009 12:35 PM
Title: Re: Agent Orange compared to Dynamo
Post by: Steven on April 17, 2009, 07:40:59 PM
quote:
Three words for bowlerdawg, jls, Steven, et al: let it go. Did y'all ever think that if you didn't ramble on for 6 pages after a bit of prodding from some trolls that they'd have little cause to troll in the first place? Didn't think so...


Crusty: There is no justification for trolling -- period. Trolls will tend to troll regardless of prodding. The best you can hope for is that by calling them out, a few will get embarrassed and stop.

Years back, the Lane#1 forum used to be an informative place where the exchange of useful information was the norm -- not the exception. For those of us who still care, it's hard to just relinquish it to the loonies.
Title: Re: Agent Orange compared to Dynamo
Post by: bowlerdawg on April 17, 2009, 08:56:30 PM
quote:
Boring as usual stalker and dawg.  Funny how you guys feel free to post on other forums in your oh-so-insightful ways yet when people come on here that are not professed "sawheads", it's called trolling.  What a bunch of overly sensitive puzzies!


ok we can examine ever post you put in this thread, and what do you think we can come up with as to how it relates to anything to do w/ the question ? or even trying to be constructive to the help the poster

now you tell me who is the troll ?

quit whining
--------------------
I'm your huckleberry
Title: Re: Agent Orange compared to Dynamo
Post by: Steven on April 17, 2009, 09:30:37 PM
CRD: First off, where is your contribution to the Dynamo vs. the AO question?? You seem intent on being here, so the least you can do offer something positive to the question. Is that too much to ask?

Now for this:

 
quote:
Funny how you guys feel free to post on other forums in your oh-so-insightful ways yet when people come on here that are not professed "sawheads", it's called trolling.


Let's clarify what you're really saying:

quote:
Funny how you guys feel free to legitimately post on other forums in your oh-so-insightful ways yet when people come on here who know squat about Lane#1 it's called trolling.


Yes, you're right -- it is trolling. For that matter, going into any forum and posting with zero knowledge/insight is trolling.

It was clear from the start you weren't running on all cylinders, and the ignorance and bad information seem to have gotten worse over time. You've progressed from just being backward to outright trolling.

Honestly CRD, why are you here?? Lane#1 is a fabulous company and brand. Instead of accepting the challenge of trying Lane#1 and forming an educated opinion that might benefit others, you throw mud and detract. What's with you?
Title: Re: Agent Orange compared to Dynamo
Post by: JessN16 on April 17, 2009, 09:54:32 PM
I got out of this thread at page 3 and I don't feel like reading all that I missed, but just from the last few posts it seems that some people are either pumping or slamming Lane #1 without ever having thrown their stuff?

If that's the case, to whoever is doing it on either side, understand the following: If you've never used a specific company's equipment, your opinion on their equipment means nothing. Completely irrelevant. You have to have "been there" to a certain degree before you have the credibility to pump or slam a ball. General commentary about the company might be relevant but, my goodness, I hope no one is really so daft as to slam or pump the balls themselves without ever having thrown one...

I've never used an AZO ball, for instance, and as such won't be posting in that forum unless it's to ask AZO users about their gear as a fact-finding mission.

Jess
Title: Re: Agent Orange compared to Dynamo
Post by: triggerman on April 17, 2009, 10:20:11 PM
jls

let me know what house in chicago you are in i will bring up my 5 ball bag next time i come thru to milwaukee i will stop so you can see one person throw it, hell i will even bring the pink ball for grins

you really need to get out more there are a ton of lane1 balls in chicago, ive personally sold over 200 nib balls to guys up there

one of the biggest resellers of lane 1 resides right outside of chi town

I answered the OP's question but i see the conversation kept on going down the path that was started  tis a shame you all couldnt let it go at that point, and by you all i mean everyone
--------------------
www.bowlingballexchange.com

Triggerman

F.O.S Loud, F.O.S. Proud

Lane #1 Baby

Title: Re: Agent Orange compared to Dynamo
Post by: Steven on April 17, 2009, 11:34:49 PM
quote:
I mean, who doesn't like watching a dog chase it's tail? That's why I am here. Nothing more and nothing less.


CRD: So it took you several posts to say it, but the bottom line is that you're not here to contribute. Just troll, detract, and get in the way. It's kind of sad that this is the best that can be expected of you.  

Trig: You've gone out of your way to give terrific input. I hope jls takes you up on your offer. I know it's sincere.
Title: Re: Agent Orange compared to Dynamo
Post by: jls on April 18, 2009, 11:24:35 AM
quote:
jls

let me know what house in chicago you are in i will bring up my 5 ball bag next time i come thru to milwaukee i will stop so you can see one person throw it, hell i will even bring the pink ball for grins

you really need to get out more there are a ton of lane1 balls in chicago, ive personally sold over 200 nib balls to guys up there

one of the biggest resellers of lane 1 resides right outside of chi town

I answered the OP's question but i see the conversation kept on going down the path that was started  tis a shame you all couldnt let it go at that point, and by you all i mean everyone
--------------------
www.bowlingballexchange.com

Triggerman

F.O.S Loud, F.O.S. Proud

Lane #1 Baby






Trig,  have to talk fast,  it's not safe on this site today.  So many heads exploding....

Now sir, I didn't say I never saw a Lane One ball,  I CLEARLY SAID, I HAVE NEVER EVER SEEN A,  A. O.  or a DYNAMO.   OK.

Now over the years I have sold and drilled many Lane One Balls...

Trig,  please make my day and tell me who is the so called big retailer???





Uncle Crusty,  a few days ago I tried to "let it go"   but Steven took advantage of the moment and attack me as well as about 5 others.

You see Uncle Crusty, Steven is a lowlife, even after B-dawg acknowledge that I had changed,  Steven just went on the attack.

Why, cause like all sawheads, they will hit you under the belt even if you are waving a white flag...

They have  NO CLASS, NO HONOR.

Therefore, I will never ever let my guard down again.  So CG will not have to worry if I 'm having a weak moment..

Cause Uncle Crusty, it will never happen again...

now

are we clear


These people are not human.....and they have no respect for anyones point of view if it differs from their's.

They feel that anything Lane One says is the gossple.  IT AIN"T.


"ball of the year"

"5 boards wider"

"more 300 games"

Will it ever end......

So Uncle Crusty,  I will not let it go, I tried but Steven attacked...

So I will respond!!!!


still clear


--------------------
jls

Edited on 4/18/2009 12:01 PM
Title: Re: Agent Orange compared to Dynamo
Post by: bowlerdawg on April 18, 2009, 12:36:35 PM
here is the deal

you act like you have some class, and you will be treated with respect

you act like a punk, and you will receive the same in kind

i don't care who you are both rules apply to all
--------------------
I'm your huckleberry

Edited on 4/18/2009 12:55 PM
Title: Re: Agent Orange compared to Dynamo
Post by: bowlerdawg on April 18, 2009, 12:58:13 PM
quote:
quote:
here is the deal

you act like you have some class,mand you will be treated with respect

you act like a punk, and you will receive the same in kind

i don't care who you are both rules apply to all
--------------------
I'm your huckleberry


and you act like the earth is flat and you get trolls...


explain cgusuk ?

doug asked a question about the difference in 2 balls
how does that make the world flat ?
flat like your 10 pins ( rh ) 7 pin ( lh ) or flat like your argument ?
--------------------
I'm your huckleberry
Title: Re: Agent Orange compared to Dynamo
Post by: bowlerdawg on April 18, 2009, 04:17:42 PM
welp if that's how you want to spin your side of the story, but the truth is you BFB's missed it

so who's the dense one ?
--------------------
I'm your huckleberry
Title: Re: Agent Orange compared to Dynamo
Post by: Steven on April 18, 2009, 04:39:25 PM
Bowlerdawg: The trolls have overrun this thread in force. The horns and tails are in a frenzy, and it's turned into a convention for some of Ballreviews most notorious bottom feeders.

Our friend CRD often talks about 'liars' and 'truth', but he's shown many times that if the 'truth' was tattooed on his azz with flashing neon lights, he wouldn't see it, much less get it.

This thread is an infested sinking ship, and it really a shame. The forum is a gift to all of us to share valuable information with each other, and some insist on using it as their personal toilet.

I'm out on this one. Good luck.
Title: Re: Agent Orange compared to Dynamo
Post by: bowlerdawg on April 18, 2009, 06:17:25 PM
quote:
Bowlerdawg: The trolls have overrun this thread in force.

 The forum is a gift to all of us to share valuable information with each other, and some insist on using it as their personal toilet.




thats what i told Scott when we pm'd the other day

its up to him if this is what he wants from his site

it's unfortunate as trolls like this have run off many worthy, knowledgeable, and truly funny people

they don't affect me
so this is for sheer entertainment value
--------------------
I'm your huckleberry
Title: Re: Agent Orange compared to Dynamo
Post by: bowlerdawg on April 18, 2009, 06:20:18 PM
we all know about crd, and jls, and the like
and that they don't deal w/ facts or truth
just spew negativity for the sake of spewing it

make them feel big i suppose

they are the supreme hypocrites, and have been exposed as such too many times to count
--------------------
I'm your huckleberry
Title: Re: Agent Orange compared to Dynamo
Post by: Buddy Christ on April 18, 2009, 06:24:43 PM
Seven pages? Seriously? Leave the company alone, for heaven's sake. Do you guys complain when car commercials say that theirs is better than the other, even if you disagree? Do you get in a huff and write 'a stern letter' telling them that they're wrong? No. It's marketing, and obviously, it's working. Regardless of if the word is spreading positively, or negatively, the word is spreading. Lane #1 doesn't get as much exposure as Storm, Brunswick, Roto-Grip, Ebonite.. so on. So, like any business, they need to find a way to get noticed. Is that wrong? No.

One guy asks a question and y'all have to cackle like hens over something of zero relevance. I enjoy using the equipment, and I will look into buying more in the future, because I enjoy the brand.

Marketing is all the same, but with different approaches. You guys like to try and act intelligent, and witty by saying the other person is stupid for believing in something that you think is irrefutable. Grow a dick [men], and quit acting like children.

Edit- All of Lane #1's advertising will appeal to the average, or less than average bowler. Are you telling me that Brunswick calling a ball Strike Zone doesn't infer anything? Good bowlers know to look beyond the hype, research for themselves, and find equipment that suits them.

Edited on 4/18/2009 6:29 PM
Title: Re: Agent Orange compared to Dynamo
Post by: bowlerdawg on April 18, 2009, 07:16:28 PM
quote:
dawg what i cant understand about these guys is if u dont like the companies products why would u spend all your time here being negative,,i dont like ebonite balls hence ive never gone to their forum,,i come here to be positive and offer help about balls i like and use,,, i just dont get theese guys


its the difference between having class , and not having any class

and buddy C brought up a good point, but it will all be in vein im afraid.

whatever i ain't going anywhere despite the trolls best efforts to get me banned
--------------------
I'm your huckleberry
Title: Re: Agent Orange compared to Dynamo
Post by: Buddy Christ on April 18, 2009, 09:52:56 PM
crd,

You're right. It has a lot to do with the posters, their ego [sometimes so large it could eat itself], and their method of taking things the wrong way. It's not a Lane #1 thing, it's a human thing. In a lot of cases, it's hard to tell if the person is being sarcastic, asking a question, or poking fun, and I'm sure that's how a lot of these lengthy page flame wars get started.
Title: Re: Agent Orange compared to Dynamo
Post by: bowlerdawg on April 18, 2009, 10:06:17 PM
if olive branches have been offered, you're right crd
i probably missed them if you posted them

seriously

if i saw the post was from you i just glazed over it ( no offense )

due to your track record, and recent bantering i just figured you were spewing non-sense

so if you have extended the branch
then it is a dead issue as far as i am concerned

plus i got a special place in my heart for all the trolls

take care, and have a good Sunday
--------------------
I'm your huckleberry
Title: Re: Agent Orange compared to Dynamo
Post by: bowlerdawg on April 18, 2009, 10:07:58 PM
quote:
Oh, you poor sensitive souls. I had no idea the angst that would be caused to you by asking you to sensibly answer questions posed to you.  I feel bad for upsetting your delicate constitutions.  I had no idea how emotional you guys really are.  Since I don't want a run on the local suicide hotlines, I will contact all the others who just don't see the world through diamond shaped glasses to cease and desist making sense in their posts and just follow along with what you fine fellows think.  There, there, it will be all right.


olive branch ?

nice
--------------------
I'm your huckleberry