win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: Brunswick 3.5 -vs- Curve  (Read 4659 times)

Big Jake

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1745
Brunswick 3.5 -vs- Curve
« on: March 07, 2010, 06:01:28 AM »
Hello Group
 For those that have thrown the Brunswick 3.5 and the new Curve how would they compare? I have the 3.5 and from what I have been reading here I'm very interested in the Curve or the Massacre Red Death. Thanks, Jake


--------------------
I proudly throw Hammer, LaneMasters, and 900-Global, and Brunswick gear...
Now throwing pretty much all flavors...

 

BeansProShop

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3144
Re: Brunswick 3.5 -vs- Curve
« Reply #1 on: March 07, 2010, 03:03:39 PM »
Iw ould say the Curve is closer to the 2.5....The 3.5 will create much more friction than the Curve..

Saw the Curve today at a tourney roll really well for Bill Bauer..

I was throwing my Red Death and they both played...

The 3.5's were more jumpy..

It was supposed to be the 2010 USBC paatern..

Hope this helps a little..
Beans
--------------------
www.beansproshop.com
--------------------
Thomas "Beans" Biniek Jr.
PBA Member and Pro Shop Owner/Operator
 Check out current eBay auctions at:
http://cgi6.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewSellersOtherItems&userid=bowling_with_leah Official Pro Shop of "ALL" F.O.S. Members!!!
Looking for a great place to sell your bowling equipment?? Auction style,Fixed Price and FREE For A Limited Time! Try www.bestintheworldauctions.com and to Purchase The "Secret Sauce" visit www.beansproshop.com
--------------------
Thomas "Beans" Biniek Jr.
PBA Member and Pro Shop Own

Big Jake

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1745
Re: Brunswick 3.5 -vs- Curve
« Reply #2 on: March 07, 2010, 03:25:20 PM »
Thanks beans your comment really helped. Is the Red Death a hybrid cover? if so does that mean that its a solid and pearl?

the reason I ask is I'm looking for an aggressive solid and from what I have been reading in here it seems that the Red Death might fit the bill
--------------------
I proudly throw Hammer, LaneMasters, and 900-Global, and Brunswick gear...
Now throwing pretty much all flavors...

ImBackInTheGame

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1022
Re: Brunswick 3.5 -vs- Curve
« Reply #3 on: March 07, 2010, 03:56:52 PM »
Red Death is a solid, Blue Death on the other hand is a true Pearl/Solid hybrid.
--------------------
Arsenal:
Roto-Grip Cell Pearl (500/4000 abralon)
Lane #1 Chainsaw (2000 + Secret Sauce)
Roto-Grip Cell (2000 abralon)
Brunswick C-System 3.5 (NIB)

BeansProShop

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3144
Re: Brunswick 3.5 -vs- Curve
« Reply #4 on: March 07, 2010, 04:31:24 PM »
Game stated it perfect...

The Red Death is an aggressive solid reactive with a great angular core design..

The Red and Blue death are a great combo...

I absolutely LOVE my Blue Death and the Red really impressed me today on a decently difficult pattern..

Beans
--------------------
www.beansproshop.com
--------------------
Thomas "Beans" Biniek Jr.
PBA Member and Pro Shop Owner/Operator
 Check out current eBay auctions at:
http://cgi6.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewSellersOtherItems&userid=bowling_with_leah Official Pro Shop of "ALL" F.O.S. Members!!!
Looking for a great place to sell your bowling equipment?? Auction style,Fixed Price and FREE For A Limited Time! Try www.bestintheworldauctions.com and to Purchase The "Secret Sauce" visit www.beansproshop.com
--------------------
Thomas "Beans" Biniek Jr.
PBA Member and Pro Shop Own

charlest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24526
Re: Brunswick 3.5 -vs- Curve
« Reply #5 on: March 07, 2010, 06:01:03 PM »
quote:
Thanks beans your comment really helped. Is the Red Death a hybrid cover? if so does that mean that its a solid and pearl? ...
--------------------
I proudly throw Hammer, LaneMasters, and 900-Global, and Brunswick gear...



I think Lane#1 calls the Red Death a "hybrid" for the propaganda/advertising effect. "Hybrid" seems to have become a positive connotation. The Red Death is actually a solid/solid hybrid, so in truth it is not truly what we think of, in bowling, when we speak of a hybrid. The same is true for the Gemstone, but it's a pearl/pearl hybrid. Technically, yes, they're hybrids. Practically speaking they are not.
--------------------
"None are so blind as those who will not see."
"None are so blind as those who will not see."

The Stroke

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 508
Re: Brunswick 3.5 -vs- Curve
« Reply #6 on: March 07, 2010, 06:19:39 PM »
Isn't the Beans a hybrid - blowhard/ripoff artist?
--------------------
Toodles

Big Jake

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1745
Re: Brunswick 3.5 -vs- Curve
« Reply #7 on: March 08, 2010, 08:25:57 AM »
Thanks everyone!
--------------------
I proudly throw Hammer, LaneMasters, and 900-Global, and Brunswick gear...
Now throwing pretty much all flavors...

Adrenaline

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 286
Re: Brunswick 3.5 -vs- Curve
« Reply #8 on: March 10, 2010, 12:37:41 AM »
quote:
The Red Death is actually a solid/solid hybrid, so in truth it is not truly what we think of, in bowling, when we speak of a hybrid.

Then what kind of Hybrid is it?  I've got one in the mail, just curious, I just assumed it was a solid.  What do you mean by solid/solid hybrid?  It has 2 separate solid coverstocks blended into one?
--------------------
Mega Friction 78x3x47 278
Virtual Gravity 47x4x40 272
Red Death
FS/FT N'Tense LevRG
FS/FT Twisted Fury
FS/FT The Sauce
FS/FT Jigsaw
FS/FT Black Widow Solid
FS/FT Kinetic Energy

charlest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24526
Re: Brunswick 3.5 -vs- Curve
« Reply #9 on: March 10, 2010, 06:32:47 AM »
quote:
quote:
The Red Death is actually a solid/solid hybrid, so in truth it is not truly what we think of, in bowling, when we speak of a hybrid.

Then what kind of Hybrid is it?  I've got one in the mail, just curious, I just assumed it was a solid.  What do you mean by solid/solid hybrid?  It has 2 separate solid coverstocks blended into one?
--------------------
Mega Friction 78x3x47 278
Virtual Gravity 47x4x40 272
Red Death
FS/FT N'Tense LevRG
FS/FT Twisted Fury
FS/FT The Sauce
FS/FT Jigsaw
FS/FT Black Widow Solid
FS/FT Kinetic Energy



Yes, as far as I have read.
--------------------
"None are so blind as those who will not see."
"None are so blind as those who will not see."

triggerman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3352
Re: Brunswick 3.5 -vs- Curve
« Reply #10 on: March 10, 2010, 08:54:48 AM »
that is exactly what it is two different versions of a solid reactive blended together, the gemstone is the same, two different pearl variations blended

Blue death a true hybrid, part solid part pearl
--------------------
www.bowlingballexchange.com

Triggerman

F.O.S Loud, F.O.S. Proud

Lane #1 Baby


BeansProShop

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3144
Re: Brunswick 3.5 -vs- Curve
« Reply #11 on: March 10, 2010, 06:24:13 PM »
quote:
Isn''t the Beans a hybrid - blowhard/ripoff artist?
--------------------
Toodles


Dear Stroke,
No.. That would be your mother...She''s the blowhard...
Thanks
--------------------
www.beansproshop.com
--------------------
Thomas "Beans" Biniek Jr.
PBA Member and Pro Shop Owner/Operator
 Check out current eBay auctions at:
http://cgi6.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewSellersOtherItems&userid=bowling_with_leah Official Pro Shop of "ALL" F.O.S. Members!!!


Edited on 3/10/2010 7:26 PM
Looking for a great place to sell your bowling equipment?? Auction style,Fixed Price and FREE For A Limited Time! Try www.bestintheworldauctions.com and to Purchase The "Secret Sauce" visit www.beansproshop.com
--------------------
Thomas "Beans" Biniek Jr.
PBA Member and Pro Shop Own

Adrenaline

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 286
Re: Brunswick 3.5 -vs- Curve
« Reply #12 on: March 11, 2010, 12:30:20 AM »
quote:
It is a solid.  You don't call a solid made up of two solids a hybrid.

But by definition it is a hybrid.
2 cover stocks combined to create one coverstock, is a hybrid.
Just because the 2 coverstocks aren't solid and pearl, doesn't mean it isn't still made up of 2 separate coverstocks.
Just because the word isn't being applied the way you've come to commonly expect, does not make it incorrect.

By definition, it's a hybrid.
As far as bowling knowledge goes, it's simply a new coverstock, that is in fact a solid.

Brickguy221

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9918
Re: Brunswick 3.5 -vs- Curve
« Reply #13 on: March 11, 2010, 09:02:47 AM »
quote:
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
It is a solid. You don't call a solid made up of two solids a hybrid.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


But by definition it is a hybrid.
2 cover stocks combined to create one coverstock, is a hybrid.
Just because the 2 coverstocks aren't solid and pearl, doesn't mean it isn't still made up of 2 separate coverstocks.
Just because the word isn't being applied the way you've come to commonly expect, does not make it incorrect.

By definition, it's a hybrid.
As far as bowling knowledge goes, it's simply a new coverstock, that is in fact a solid.
 


+1....Adrenaline has it right.
--------------------
"Whenever I feel the urge to exercise I lie down until the feeling passes away."

Brick
"Whenever I feel the urge to exercise I lie down until the feeling passes away"

The Stroke

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 508
Re: Brunswick 3.5 -vs- Curve
« Reply #14 on: March 11, 2010, 09:03:36 AM »
quote:
It is a solid.  You don't call a solid made up of two solids a hybrid.

+2
--------------------
Toodles