Author Topic: Brunswick 3.5 -vs- Curve (Read 4660 times)

Big Jake · « **on:** March 07, 2010, 06:01:28 AM »

Hello Group
For those that have thrown the Brunswick 3.5 and the new Curve how would they compare? I have the 3.5 and from what I have been reading here I'm very interested in the Curve or the Massacre Red Death. Thanks, Jake

--------------------
I proudly throw Hammer, LaneMasters, and 900-Global, and Brunswick gear...

elgavachon · « **Reply #16 on:** March 11, 2010, 09:20:29 AM »

I think pearls are solids with mica particles added to the mix. A hybrid might be nothing more than a solid with a light load. Not enough to call it a pearl.

Adrenaline · « **Reply #17 on:** March 12, 2010, 03:28:45 PM »

quote:
No, by your definition, almost every ball that has come out would be a hybrid. Actually, the definition of the word hybrid would make every ball that has been made, a hybrid. However, in the classical sense of the word in regards to bowling balls and the terminology that has been used to describe their basic makeup, I believe it would be incorrect to call this ball a hybrid.

It's not my definition, it's the dictionary's.
You can argue all you want, I already explained it.
By definition it is technically a hybrid.
By common bowling terms, it's not what we consider a Hybrid.

ryne299 · « **Reply #18 on:** March 12, 2010, 10:37:47 PM »

who gives a flyin f u c k what defenition of hybrid matters. holy s h i t i love this site but some people act like the exact people in bowling alleys i freakin hate. no offense to anyone on this post cause i see it everywhere but god d a m n people just want info here. this is not who wants to be a millionaire and measure each others c o c k s and see whos is bigger. man up and get over this s h i t guys. dont we get enough of this in the towns we bowl in
--------------------
normally you should practice to get your game good then get some equipment to put it all together and win. im lazy so i just buy new stuff and hope for the best

charlest · « **Reply #19 on:** March 13, 2010, 08:11:18 AM »

quote:
who gives a flyin f u c k what defenition of hybrid matters. holy s h i t i love this site but some people act like the exact people in bowling alleys i freakin hate. no offense to anyone on this post cause i see it everywhere but god d a m n people just want info here. this is not who wants to be a millionaire and measure each others c o c k s and see whos is bigger. man up and get over this s h i t guys. dont we get enough of this in the towns we bowl in
--------------------
normally you should practice to get your game good then get some equipment to put it all together and win. im lazy so i just buy new stuff and hope for the best

The difference is that when we use a certain term in bowling or any sport, activity, hobby or business, we expectthat object to conform,not just to the technical specifications, but to our own ideas and to the common and accepted usage of the terms.

In bowling hybrid has come to mean a combination of solid and pearlized coverstocks, for the 99% case. This is because a solid/pearl combo acts differently from a solid and a pearl. A solid/solid combo (Red Death) does not act differently from a solid and a pearl/pearl combo (Gemstone) does nto act differently from a pearl.

Lane#1 did the same thing years ago when they mixed Activator with PK 18. They implied this in the name of the coverstock , but they never called it a hybrid. That's because hybrids, back then, did not have the positive implications that the Storm Hy-Road has given the label, "hybrid", in today's bowling environment.
--------------------
"None are so blind as those who will not see."

Author Topic: Brunswick 3.5 -vs- Curve (Read 4660 times)

Big Jake

Brunswick 3.5 -vs- Curve

elgavachon

Re: Brunswick 3.5 -vs- Curve

Adrenaline

Re: Brunswick 3.5 -vs- Curve

ryne299

Re: Brunswick 3.5 -vs- Curve

charlest

Re: Brunswick 3.5 -vs- Curve