as I expected (which is why I don't believe in any of your tests), you hide what you don't want to show
from that USBC test
I see you ignored the rest .. which shows what you don't want to say
Ball motion statistics -------------------------- POS ----- NEG
Average Difference in Intended Path @ 49' -- 17.27 -- 15.18
Average Difference in Intended Path @ 60' -- 29.90 -- 28.20
Difference in Average Path @ 49' ------------- 17.19 -- 15.33
Difference in Average Path @ 60' ------------- 30.31 -- 28.62
Velocity Decrease from 13'-49'---------------- 1.90 --- 1.67
Velocity Decrease from 13'-60'---------------- 2.69 --- 2.53
Change in Angle To Headpin @ 13'-49'------- 6.06 --- 5.81
Change in Angle To Headpin @ 13'-60'------- 7.18 --- 7.13
if your claim is right, how come these numbers are not even close !!! or you want to convince us that 17.27 is the same as 15.18 !! lol
quote:
There is no imaginary 6 3/4" mass bias on a symmetrical bowling ball.
and we are suppose to believe you !!! lol keep believing in what BigB feeding you data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b3566/b3566d82a079ee1e58aff35b3f9cd9be755c4cdc" alt=""
btw, if CG doesn't really matter, why your balls are drilled with POS CG !!! and NONE of them is drilled with NEG CG ... guess you're right, CG doesn't matter data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b3566/b3566d82a079ee1e58aff35b3f9cd9be755c4cdc" alt=""
--------------------
Member of F.O.S. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f4266/f4266ebfde6a1dee93315a91f2bdfedf2ebf7339" alt=""
Edited on 3/5/2008 10:59 AM